Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Sorted by: recent Page 10 of about 12,790 results (0.882 seconds)

Jun 07 2002 (HC)

Sama Yadaiah @ Yadi Reddy and ors. Vs. Special Deputy Collector, Land ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD195; 2003(1)ALT83

..... learned advocate-general appearing for the state produced a copy of the notification issued under section 4(1) of the act to acquire the schedule land and the court in view of that development closed the contempt case by observing as follows :'it is expected that the respondents will take expeditious action for completion ..... raised is ex facie untenable. the learned counsel would conclude by contending that there is absolutely no supporting evidence to sustain the plea of the respondent authorities that the schedule land is already acquired and compensation paid.8. the learned advocate-general, on the other hand, would contend that the writ petition is ..... this court made in the earlier writ proceedings referred to above. during the course of hearing of the said contempt case, the court directed the respondent authorities through the learned advocate- general who represented them to cause an enquiry and verify whether the petitioners were paid any compensation in the earlier acquisition. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2002 (HC)

Guda Anjaneyulu and anr. Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(3)ALD387; 2002(4)ALT755

..... to systematic and scientific exploitation of granite throughout the country. in exercise of the powers conferred under section 15(1) of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957, the government of andhra pradesh made the rules, known as 'andhra pradesh minor mineral concession rules, 1966' and the object of the said rules, ..... 11-2001. it is further contended that with regard to the granting of lease for the granites, the conservation development rules 1999 are applicable, which is a later rule, under which the competent authority for granting of lease is the state government, but not the director and that the state government has to take ..... exercise of the jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution, cannot permit a party to bypass such statutory remedy, and assign itself the role of statutory authority. in this context, the legal propositions relied on by the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the 5th respondent the learned government pleader, fully lend .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2001 (HC)

Dipak Chandra Ruhidas Vs. Chandan Kumar Sarkar

Court : Guwahati

..... ) to (g) of the election petition are unnecessary, frivolous, vexatious and vague. under prayer (c) the prayer to direct the competent authority under section 8a of the act to submit to the president of india the finding of this high court for passing necessary orders disqualifying the respondent is also not in conformity with ..... 19 the election petitioner has pleaded that on the basis of a complaint dated 20.12.1993 submitted by one rabindra banikya ex-chairman, assam state development corporation for s.c ltd., abhayapuri to the chief election commissioner, the election commission of india, new delhi has taken up the matter as a result ..... the details of 'suppression' of facts/'manipulation'/'exercising of un-due influence' or as regards the obtaining of the certificate 'fraudulently' or in connivance with the authorities. such general expressions like suppression' of facts/'manipulation'/'exercising of undue influence' in the pleadings do not amount to any allegation of facts. moreso, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2001 (HC)

Sheriff Iqbal HussaIn Ahmed (Died) by Lrs. Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Other ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD176

..... the 4th respondent to stop further construction. this court also passed orders in wpmp no. 12886 of 1997 directing the commissioner, vijayawada, guntur and tenali urban development authority (hereinafter referred to as uda) to see that the unofficial 4th respondent does not violate the regulations or the building bye-laws. in wpmp no.12885 of ..... why the constructions made till then should not be removed under section 43 of the andhra pradesh urban development act. the 4th respondent was also served with a notice dated 30-7-1984 under section 43 of the act, whereunder it is stated that if the 4th respondent would not stop further construction, serious action ..... in contravention of the statutory provisions and to seek a direction against an individual, plaintiff herein to conform to the obligation laid in chapter xii of the act and to demolish any construction made in contravention thereof, either by way of a civil proceeding or seeking mandamus under article 226 of the constitution. therefore, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2001 (HC)

Balwantbhai Maganlal Chauhan Vs. Municipal Corporation of the City of ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)3GLR1963

..... no. 172 of village majura, ta: choryasi, dist: surat admesuring 44010 sq. mirs. the surat urban development authority reserved the aforesaid land under section 12(2)(b) of the gujarat town planning and urban development act, 1976. (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). it is alleged that in the year 1967, the land was reserved for a slaughter house for a ..... agreement within a period of 10 years from the date of coming into force of final development plan. the petitioner therefore, served a notice to the government on 7th june, 1997 requiring the authority to acquire the land under section 20 of the act and if within six months from the date of the service of such notice, the ..... service of six months notice under section 20(2) of the act. the conclusion of this court is that on interpretation of secs. 20 and 21 of the act is that mere issuance of a draft revised final development plan under section 21 of the act by the authority, shall not take away the right already accrued and vested in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2000 (HC)

Bima Office Premises Co-operative Society and Etc. Vs. Kalamboli Villa ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2001Bom83; 2001(1)MhLj806

..... specified in the notification. (2) to (4) ... (5) on the constitution of, or on the declaration of any corporation or company as, a development authority for any new town, the local authority or authorities functioning, within the area designated under this act as a site for the new town, immediately before such constitution or declaration shall cease to exercise the powers and perform the functions ..... behalf.' section 113-a deals with the power of thestate government to acquire land for corporation or company declared to be new town development authority, whereas objects of the development authority are to be found under section 114 of the said act. the provisions of section 113-a read as under :'113a. power of state government to acquire land for corporation or company declared to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2000 (SC)

Ut, Chandigarh and ors. Vs. Avtar Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2002)10SCC432

..... as engrafted in the act and the rules made thereunder. in the aforesaid premises, we would call upon ..... 243-o and bearing in mind the provisions of the punjab panchayati raj act, 1994 and the rules made thereunder, we have no hesitation to come to the conclusion that the appropriate authority should create the post of block development and panchayat officer which is a statutory obligation of the authority, so that the incumbent of the said post would discharge his statutory duties .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2000 (TRI)

Electricity Poles Manufacturing Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)(121)ELT96TriDel

..... state govt. further, it is alleged that by virtue of notification no. so-232(o) dated 2-4-1991 issued under section 11b of the industries development and regulation act, 1951 (idra for short), the party being a manufacturing unit owned and controlled by upseb ceases to be an ssi unit. it is, therefore averred ..... relevance to them. the availability of exemption under these notifications would depend entirely on the provisions specified therein. the reference to the idra provisions by the departmental authority in this respect, therefore, is entirely misconceived and not sustainable in law. the appellants, however, contend that during the relevant period (1992-93) their annual ..... context viz. clubbing of the clearances of electricity poles manufactured in the various units of the appellants - the identical findings arrived at by the departmental authorities had been set aside and the appeal of the party was allowed. the ld counsel for the appellants submitted that in terms of the provisions of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2000 (HC)

The Punjab State Co-operative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. Vs. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2000)126PLR16

..... important instrument of the government implementing socio-economic programmes, playing a significant role in establishing market prices, integrated development of rural areas, generating employment and earning foreign exchange. under section 26 of the act, the state government has the right to nominate three directors on the bench of directors of the markfed, ..... . also, it must give to the delinquent officer an opportunity to represent before it records it findings. the principles of natural justice require the authority to give an opportunity to the officer charged of misconduct. in this case, the inquiry officer had observed that although the shortage in weight of ..... a pedestal. it lies grafted in it with articulate skill by judicial process.'14. in this case, the inquiry officer was different from the punishing authority. charge against the delinquent was that of embezzlement while the inquiry officer found that the charge of embezzlement was not proved instead negligence was proved. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1999 (HC)

Ansal Properties and Industries Limited Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2000)124PLR663

..... by developing a colony and allotting flats and other residential apartments to private individuals. no doubt, the licence was issued to the petitioner under the provisions of 1975 act and the rules framed there under, but only on that account the ..... , on the ground of non-payment of external development charges within time prescribed. while considering the said act, it was held by the division bench as under:-'we are further of the opinion that the petitioner cannot challenge the terms and conditions of the contract while it had entered with the haryana urban development authority and on the basis of which it amassed wealth .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //