Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Court: kolkata Page 8 of about 257 results (0.100 seconds)

Peter James Gifran Von KalkesteIn Bleach Vs. State of West Bengal and ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2003CriLJ332

..... has jurisdiction to determine the validity of the pardon where the question of validity depends upon whether or not the governor at the time the pardon was issued had authority to act as governor. so, also, there are numerous decisions to the effect that courts have jurisdiction to pass upon the validity of pardons which it is alleged were ..... do, that the rule of law requires that challenge shall be permitted insofar as issues arise of a kind with which the courts are competent to deal.'82. this development of the law on prerogative mercy was recognised by the courts in england.83. however, the subsequent decision of the privy council in tomas reckley v. minister of ..... is to make rules for its own guidance in the exercise of the pardon power keeping, of course, a large residuary power to meet special situations or sudden developments. this will exclude the vice of discrimination such as may arise where two persons have been convicted and sentenced in the same case for the same degree of guilt .....

Sumermal JaIn and Another Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, C ...

Court : Kolkata

..... operation to be undertaken. according to the affidavit, in cours.of the investigation by the revenue authorities into the affairs of a company by the name of emta coal limited, which is engaged in, inter alia, the development and operation of coal mines allotted to power utilities owned by the state and central governments, it ..... opinion which has to be formed is subjective and, therefore, the jurisdiction of the court to interfere is very limited as the court will not act as an appellate authority and examine meticulously the information in order to decide for itself as to whether action under section 132 is called for. in the judgments reported ..... the challenge to the subsequent notices may entail multiplicity of proceedings; and, thus, such aspect of the matter is also dealt with. section 132 of the act permits certain high officers of the income tax department to authorise certain specified classes of officers to conduct search and seizure operations as indicated in the section, upon .....

K.K. Das, Receiver and ors. Vs. Sm. Amina Khatun Bibi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1940Cal356

..... poramanick v. ramdhone bhuttacharjee (1866) 6 w.r. 228 (f.b.) a proposition which has been approved by the judicial committee of the privy council in vallabhdas naranji v. development officer bandra (1929) 16 a.i.r. p.c. 163. he, defendant 3, could not have claimed compensation from respondent as there was no equity in his favour. he ..... 1 h.l. 129 was applied by the judicial committee in a case from india, lala beniram v. kundanlal (1899) 21 all. 496. in our judgment that decision lends authority to the view that the principle formulated in the second proposition in ramsden v. dyson (1865) 1 h.l. 129 is a principle applicable to indian cases. this view of ..... 1866) 6 w.r. 228 (f.b.) and the principle entitling a person to compensation has now been given statutory recognition in the case of transferees (section 51, t.p. act). in the said case, thakoor chunder poramanick v. ramdhone bhuttacharjee (1866) 6 w.r. 228 (f.b.) three propositions are laid down: (1) buildings and other such improvements .....

Indian Bank Vs. Bengal Potteries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1982]52CompCas471(Cal)

..... . but, in my view, all those decisions have no application to the facts of this present case where by operation of the said act, being the industries (development & regulation) act, 1951, the winding-up proceeding is stayed so long as the control and management of the industrial undertaking being the respondent-company (in liquidation ..... in accordance with the terms of the notified order, remain suspended or modified, and all proceedings relating thereto pending before any court, tribunal, officer or other authority shall accordingly remain stayed or be continued subject to such adaptations, so, however, that on the notified order ceasing to have effect- (a) any ..... effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law, agreement or instrument or any decree or order of a court, tribunal, officer or other authority or of any submission, settlement or standing order. (4) any remedy for the enforcement of any right, privilege, obligation or liability referred to in clause .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Swedish East Asia Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1980)19CTR(Cal)10,[1981]127ITR148(Cal)

..... the chief inspector of taxes of the u.k. during the relevant periods there was in the u.k. an 'investment allowance' corresponding to 'development rebate' under the indian i.t. act, 1922. the certificate issued by the u.k. chief inspector contained the percentage ratios of the total world profits of the appellants, the wear and ..... the three bases mentioned in rule 33 was incorrect. the second of the three bases mentioned in rule 33 could not apply and the fact that the authorities under the act as well as the parties were under a mistaken impression could not alter the true position in law. therefore, the appellant's income had to be ..... : [1972]83itr335(sc) . there, the supreme court observed, the cbdt was not competent to give any direction regarding the exercise of any judicial power by any subordinate authorities. though, in that case, the instructions related to a specific matter, mr. justice hegde observed that the board was not competent to give the direction regarding the exercise of .....

Abp Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2005)199CTR(Cal)404,[2005]278ITR627(Cal)

..... had escaped assessment. this kind of exercise of power must be held to be an abuse of the power. i am therefore, of the view that the authority acted illegally and without jurisdiction in issuing the impugned notice to the petitioner ; and hence it is liable to be set aside.5. for these reasons i allow ..... of machinery purchased during this year with bills and vouchers which were examined. during this year the assessee has claimed deduction under section 35 for scientific research and development work. on this point the auditor's report is examined. the assessee was asked to produce employees attached with scientific research work. sri a. k. sengputa ..... their claim of tax benefit on account of purchase of machinery for scientific research and development work. the order of the assessing officer attained finality and it was not questioned by either of the parties in any manner, till the time the authority issued the impugned notice dated september 27, 2000, seeking to reopen the case. along .....

Gour Dey Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN598

..... or other transfers of land' made 'by the government or under its authority'. in the decision of sunil vasudeva and ors. v. delhi development authority reported in : air1988delhi184 , it has been held that the lease granted by the delhi development authority would be covered by the government grants act. the said government grants act has not made any distinction between either lease executed for valuable considerations or ..... other purposes. therefore, in my opinion, the lease executed by the concerned authority for land in salt lake would be covered under provisions of government .....

Bhawani Shankar Chachan Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs (Preventive ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1981CriLJ505

..... set out in sub-clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of section 3(1) of the act, and there are no grounds in the order of detention which relate to sub-clause (i), it, goes to show that the detaining authority acted mechanically and passed the order of detention without proper application of his mind. the non-application of ..... mind of the detaining authority in passing the order of detention and the mechanical way of his acting, as is borne out by the above discussion, also goes to ..... selling the synthetic fabrics to several parties including some coming from rajnmundry (andhra) who are booking the goods to various destinations in the south by road transport. development of this intelligence led to seizure on 4-12-1978 of four bundles containing about 400 meters synthetics fabrics valued at rs. 32,000/- which were sought to .....

Tapas Kumar Hazra and Development Concern Vs. State of West Bengal and ...

Court : Kolkata

..... of an arbitration clause. the apex court passed the order on may 2, 2003. immediately, the state filed arbitration an application and conciliation under act, sectio 16. of the challenging the authority of the arbitrator. the arbitrator asked them to produce the tender document. according to the arbitrator, the state failed to disclose the tender document. ..... 1 order sheet apo no.75 of 2013 ap no.323 of 2005 in the high court at calcutta civil appellate jurisdiction original side tapas kumar hazra & development concern versus state of west bengal & ors before: the hon'ble justice banerjee the hon'ble justice dr.mrinal kanti chaudhuri date :25. h april, ..... learned single judge. they belatedly approached the apex court. the apex court condoned the delay and permitted them to raise such issue under section 16 of the act. they immediately raised such issue before the learned arbitrator. hence it was incumbent upon the arbitral tribunal to firs.satisfy itself, it had jurisdiction to enter upon .....

Panskura Automobiles and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... in appreciating the evidence. the constitution enshrines and guarantees the rule of law and article 226 is designed to ensure that each and every authority in the state, including the government acts bona fide and within the limits of its power and we consider that when a court is satisfied that there is an abuse or ..... respondents had ample time to file their affidavits in reply, none of the respondents except respondent 2, the lt. governor of delhi and respondent 5, land & development officer has chosen to deny the allegations. the counter-affidavit of respondent 2 purporting to be on behalf of all the respondents is that the allegations made by ..... palpably absurd or actuated by demonstrable malice, a challenge thereto would be repelled as premature and the noticee would be left to face the proceedings before the authority. the corporation refers to the kunisetty satyanarayana decision of the supreme court that the petitioners have relied on and cite a recent judgment of a division bench .....