Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kalakshetra foundation act 1993 section 15 academic committee Year: 1992 Page 65 of about 643 results (0.299 seconds)

Pioneer Investment Services Co. Vs. Brunswick Associates Ltd. Partners ...

Court : US Supreme Court

..... et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit no. 91-1695. argued november 30, 1992-decided march 24,1993 as unsecured creditors of petitioner-a company seeking relief under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code-respondents were required to file proofs of claim with ..... unattended to esp[ecially] through carelessness." webster's ninth new collegiate dictionary 791 (1983) (emphasis added). the word therefore encompasses both simple, faultless omissions to act and, more commonly, omissions caused by carelessness. courts properly assume, absent sufficient indication to the contrary, that congress intends the words in its enactments to carry ..... even accepting the conclusion that excusable neglect may cover some instances of negligence, indifference falls outside the range of the "excusable." because the failure to act in this case did not result from excusable neglect, there is no 408 408 pioneer investment services co. v. brunswick associates ltd. partnership occasion .....

Voinovich Vs. Quilter

Court : US Supreme Court

..... et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of ohio no. 91-1618. argued december 8, 1992-decided march 2,1993 pursuant to the ohio constitution's requirement that electoral districts for the state legislature be reapportioned every 10 years, appellant james tilling drafted and the state apportionment ..... (quoting reyn olds v. sims, 377 u. s. 533 , 586 (1964))). because the "states do not derive their reapportionment authority from the voting rights act, but rather from independent provisions of state and federal law," brief for united states as amicus curiae 12, the federal courts are bound to respect the states' ..... should not have invalidated the 1991 plan without finding that, under the totality of the circumstances, it diluted minority voting strength: "having implemented the voting rights act remedy in the absence of a violation, [appellants] suggest that we are now required to establish a violation as a prerequisite to removing the remedy. actually .....

Shyam Kishore Goswami Vs. District Magistrate, Hamirpur and Another

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1993All1

ORDERM.K. Mukherjee, C.J.1. The subject matter of challenge in this writ petition is an order dt. Dec. 24. 1991, passed by a learned Munsif of Mahoba in a suit filed by the respondent No. 4 herein whereby he issued a temporary order of injunction restraining the Municipality of Mahoba fromholding a meeting to consider a motion of no-confidence against the said respondent and also made a reference under S. 113 of the Civil P.C. When the writ petition was taken up for hearing a threshold question, as to its maintainability was raised on behalf of the respondents, on the ground that the impugned order of injunction was an appealable one and, therefore, this court could not entertain the writ petition.2. It was, however contended by Mr. Khare appearing for the petitioner that as the suit filed by the respondent No. 4 was not maintainable, the impugned order of injunction was without any jurisdiction. Mr. Khare further submitted that the learned Munsif could not have invoked S. 113 of the C...