Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kalakshetra foundation act 1993 section 15 academic committee Court: mumbai Page 7 of about 4,203 results (0.111 seconds)

Prakash Rewadmal Gupta Vs. Lonavala Municipal Council and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR993; 2002(2)BomCR484

..... that hence, the restrictions which apply to the latter must apply to the former as well. unnikrishnan v. state of a.p., : [1993]1scr594 . section 125 of the act provides that any land required, reserved or designated in a regional plan, development plan or town planning scheme for a public purpose or purposes ..... 1986, the lonavala municipal council resolved to initiate a minor modification to the sanctioned development plan under section 37 of the maharashtra regional and town planning act, 1966 ('the act') so as to change the designation of the site reserved in the development plan from the existing reservation for the dr. b.n. purandare ..... to a reservation for the college belonging to the third respondent, the lonavala education trust. the municipal council after following the procedure under section 37 of the act, submitted the aforesaid minor modification for the sanction of the state government and by a notification dated 8th june, 1987, the state government sanctioned the modification .....

international Airports Authority Employees Union Vs. International Air ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR43; (2002)IIILLJ277Bom

..... been allotted by the board to the first respondent.16. the division bench of this court in an unreported judgment dated march 23, 1993 proceeded on the admitted position that the act applied to the petitioners therein and that the petitioners were not regular employees of the first respondent.17. after referring to the various provisions ..... of bombay : [1955]1scr799 ).121. as observed earlier the division bench of this court in krantikari srs v. s.n. naik [1993] 1 clr 1003 has held that the security guards act is a complete code in itself. thus, this test of repugnancy or inconsistency squarely applies in the present case.122. in the circumstances the ..... relationship between the registered security guard and registered employer. the petition impugned the order dismissing the complaint.45. the facts in writ petition no. 3862 of 1993 were that it was alleged in the complaint that the security guards who were allotted to the registered employer were withdrawn by the board and allotted to some .....

Bhosale Deepak Manikrao and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR546; 1998(2)BomCR352

..... the improper rejection or acceptance of a nomination paper as a ground for setting aside the election of a returned candidate. the apprehension expressed in without any foundation.15. these writ petitions cannot be entertained and no effective relief can be granted to the petitioners in view of the constitutional bar under article 243- ..... [1952]1scr218 , now it is settled that acceptance or rejection of nomination paper is a stage in the election. section 15-a inserted by the maharashtra act no. 36/1993 creates a bar to interference by courts in electoral matters. it reads, as under :'15-a. no election to any panchayat shall be called in question ..... disentitle the petitioners from assailing the rejection of their nomination papers. since the nomination papers were rejected on the ground not available under the rules or the act, this would be an error made by the returning officer and, therefore, the election cannot be possibly challenged on the ground of irregularity or informality not .....

Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd Vs. Nishiland Park Limited.

Court : Mumbai

..... and presumption. there is no actual figure or material placed on record to support the same. mere averments or expert evidence on marketing, cannot be the sole foundation to support the alleged loss or claim of the respondent. in the competitive business or market, one such label itself cannot bring or attract the customer to visit ..... of rs. 15 lakh from 1st june, 2004 till the date of the award."15. admittedly, the petitioner never acted upon, the unilaterally signed 1999 agreement. the respondent claimed rs.15 lacs on a foundation that the petitioner failed to make the balance consideration from 1 february 1999 to 31 january 2003 without any supporting documents ..... loss, was not considered at all. the law of mitigation under section 34 of the arbitration act, cannot be overlooked by the court, when such award is challenged on the merit itself. the loss of profit claims always have a foundation of net loss and not only the estimated gross profit, without supporting accounts and material. .....

Viral Filaments Limited Vs. Indusind Bank Limited

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR737; [2003]113CompCas85(Bom)

..... reasons, we hold that at the stage of adjudication under section 17 and execution of the certificate under section 25 etc. the provisions of the r.d.b. act, 1993 confer exclusive jurisdiction on the tribunal and the recovery officer in respect of debts payable to banks and financial institutions and there can be no interference by the company ..... and also after a winding-up order is passed. no leave of the company court is necessary for initiating or continuing the proceedings under the r.d.b. act, 1993. points 2 and 3 are decided accordingly in favour of the appellant and against the respondents.'15. the supreme court pointed out in allahabad bank (supra) that ..... to the gist of the affidavit in reply filed to oppose admission of the winding up petition. one would have expected the argument to be based on surer foundation. if there was any material presented before the company court to indicate that the company's assets far exceeded its liabilities, or that the cash crunch was only .....

Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. Vazir Glass Works Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1997(75)FLR180]; (1998)IIILLJ231Bom

..... maharashtra, mumbai on a reference made by the state government under section 25(o)(5) of industrial disputes act, 1947. the respondent no. 2 state of maharashtra had made the said reference on the application dated 23.2.1993 by the company for review of the government's order dated 12.10.1992 on the company's ..... : (1986)illj142sc , union of india v. stump schedle & somappa ltd. & ors. 1989 1 clr 683 and laxmi starch and ors. v. kundara factory workers union and ors. 1993 1 clr 189. 16. while supporting to award of the tribunal the learned counsel for the respondent-company has made the following submissions. a) that the court in exercising its ..... .1995 is hereby quashed and set aside and consequently the company is refused permission to close down the factory pursuant to its application for review dated 23rd february 1993, which the apex court considered as deemed application dated 9th march 1994. rule made absolute in the aforesaid terms. in the circumstances of the case there shall .....

Sadbuddhi Brahmesh Wagh, Vs. Sheela Mahabaleshwar Wagh (Since Deceased ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(1)ARBLR79(Bom); 2003(6)BomCR787

..... were tendered by the parties. during the course of the proceedings before the learned arbitrator, a statement was made on behalf of mahabaleshwar by his counsel on 11th february 1993 that he was not pressing prayer (a) of the plaint. the learned arbitrator recorded it accordingly that it was conceded that wfas was not a partnership business as ..... and 14 of c.j. ghadialli and ors. v. z.b. wadiwalla reported in 1981 mh.l.j 876 which read as follows:-'.....till the amendment of rent act by act xxii of 1978, which came into force on 23-10-1978, the legal position was laid down in rajaram b. upadhyaya and ors. v. ramraj r. upadhyay ..... of section 28 conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the court of small causes. the court made distinction between exclusive jurisdiction conferred on the court of small causes under the rent act and the jurisdiction to decide jurisdictional facts. as far as this latter aspect is concerned, the court did not hold that jurisdictional facts are necessarily to be decided .....

Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Star Glass Works

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR583; 2003(3)BomCR347; [2003]114CompCas378(Bom); [2003]42SCL769(Bom)

..... been raised in this writ petition. the question is whether in section 2(e) of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions, act, 1993 (for snort, 'act of 1993') which says that 'banking company' shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (c) of section 5 of banking regulation ..... non-agricultural co-operative banks certain provisions of the existing central laws which are relatable to 'banking'.'from the careful and, conjoint reading of the banking regulation act, act of 1993 and the respective preamble, objectives and reasons, it would be clear that the co-operative banks were not at all intended to be excluded from the benefits ..... of machinery made available to the banks under act of 1993 for recovery of outstanding debts. the act of 1993 was enacted to work out suitable mechanism through which the dues to the banks and financial institutions could be recovered and realised without delay .....

Virendralal B. Vaishya Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR487; 2003(2)BomCR551; [2003(97)FLR21]; 2003(2)MhLj64

..... the b.a. degree. he further placed reliance on the order of the national council for teacher education (for short 'ncte') which specified that the ncte act, 1993 did not envisage granting recognition to examining bodies for conduct of examinations and award of degrees/diplomas and, therefore, the hindi sahitya sammelan was not required to seek ..... he had continued in service. the learned counsel further submitted that it was only because of the petitioner's initial representation to the collector, diu on 22nd november 1993 wherein he had falsely stated that he had passed b.sc. degree with maths, science and english in second division that the respondents had issued him a ..... an assistant teacher on a regular basis. mr. kulkarni placed reliance on the judgments of the supreme court in v.k. sood v. secretary, civil aviation and ors. : (1993)iillj544sc union of india and anr. v. yogendra singh : 1994(2)scale898 ravinder sharma (smt.) and anr. v. state of punjab and ors., : (1995)iillj589sc and dr .....

Niraj Vikas Pabale and ors. Vs. the Tahsildar and ors.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... municipal rules should be followed for villages where there is no municipal council and development scheme has not been framed. it expressly cancels letter dated 8/12/1993 to the contrary issued by the director, town planning. (b). it is obvious that sites on which respondent no.5 has raised constructions are in ..... out concerned zilla parishad ceo, councilor or panchayat members, gram panchayat members, sarpanch, secretary and employees, and also why they did not detect or report or act against the unauthorized structures coming up at nalwadi. (3)to find out concerned revenue officers and employees like collector, sub-divisional officers, tahsildar's, talathi's, ..... their statutory obligations. when petitioners did approach collector and gram panchayat for redressal and those authorities ignored it, it is obvious that their refusal to act is not mere omission. even one chief executive officer of respondent no.6 zilla parishad has found all structures of respondent no.5 illegal. looking .....