Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kalakshetra foundation act 1993 section 15 academic committee Court: allahabad Page 14 of about 4,491 results (0.090 seconds)

Dr. Mahendra Pal Vs. Collector, Hardoi and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2398

..... counselfor the parties and also perused therecord.9. procedure for motion expressing want of confidence in pramukh or any up-pramukh has been provided under section 15 of the act. in the present case, we will have to see as to whether procedure prescribed for motion of no-confidence was followed or not. and if not, whether ..... the notices were issued by the collector in contravention of the provisions of section 15 of u. p. kshetra samitis and zila parishad adhiniyam, 1961 (for short 'the act'). therefore, said notices were liable to be quashed.3. petitioner challenging validity of the said notices filed presentpetition in this court on 24.7.1997. on the said date ..... the present case, was involved in the case of ram nath tripathi v. commissioner. lucknow division, lucknow and others, 1993 (11) lcd 375, a division bench of this court after referring to the provisions of section 15 of the act, and the rules framed thereunder, was pleased to rule as under :'21. section 15 (3) is in mandatory form .....

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... '. this being the situation by virtue of the overriding effect of the provisions of ncr act, the amendment of land use in the master plan under u.p. act from 'recreational' to 'residential' at an intermediate stage, which is the main foundation of the respondents' claim, cannot confer any enforceable right in them. however, if the ..... find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to approve the approach adopted by the learned single judge in dealing with writ petition nos. 2379 and 2380 of 1993 filed by the brothers of respondent no.1. he distinguished the judgments of the division bench in mrs. behroze ramyar batha and others v. special land acquisition ..... report indicates that petitioners factory was over plot nos. 563, 564, 573 and 574 which was reported closed. petitioners claims that factory is in existence since 1993 and reiterated that license has been granted by the director industries. it is further pleaded that the land sought to be acquired by impugned notification is part .....

Moti Lal and ors. Vs. the Government of the State of Uttar Pradesh and ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All257

..... for purposes of gain is special and extraordinary, which, generally at least, the legislature may prohibit or condition as it sees fit.'we do not, however, know the foundation for the rule laid down in these decisions that the use of a street or highway for purposes of game is exceptional, and therefore liable to be prohibited or regulated ..... operate. it is argued that in the absence of a definition of 'executive power' the executive, whether union or state, is wholly without power to do any act unless that act is directly authorised by the appropriate legislature or is clearly incidental to legislative authority already given. its function is limited to the execution of the laws, and if ..... 7, 8 and 9 of part in, articles 14, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 31, 34, 202, 226, 276, 285, 287, 289 and 289(2) of the act. the act has used four words, viz. citizen, person, individual and human beings. in some articles the word 'person' is of wider import than citizen, individual or human being and would include .....

Smt. Manju Jaiswal and ors. Vs. Recovery Officer, D.R.T. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC226; I(2005)BC373

..... be mentioned that a recovery order is appealable under section 30 of the recovery of the debts due to bank and financial institution act, 1993. admittedly, the petitioners have not filed any appeal under section 30 of the said act and have rushed to this court.20. in our opinion, the petitioners should file such an appeal and pray for stay, and it ..... aggrieved against the ex parte judgment dated 21.12.2001, the petitioner filed restoration application for recalling the said order along with an application under section 5 of the limitation act with an affidavit in which it was stated that the judgment dated 21.12.2001 was an ex parte judgment as no opportunity for filing written statement and adducing evidence .....

Lcl Jewellery Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2004All138; IV(2004)BC124; [2004]53SCL97(All)

..... the opposite party no. 1 made an application to the debts recovery tribunal under section 19 of recovery debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993 (hereinafter to be referred as an act) for recovery of the debt from the petitioners.4. before the tribunal i.e. opposite party no. 4 a preliminary objection was raised by ..... on merits, liabilities has been fixed by the tribunal upon petitioners, they ought to have approached the appellate tribunal for statutory remedy of appeal provided under the act instead of rushing to this court in the present writ petition. his further submission is that since nothing was paid by the petitioners towards the term loan, therefore ..... factual scenario under which the instant writ petition arises is as follows :the petitioner no. 1 which is said to be a company duly incorporated under the companies act, 1956 and petitioners no. 2 and 3 being its directors, with a view to promote a project to manufacture gold, jewellery for domestic as well as for .....

ishwar Chandra Gupta and ors Vs. State of U.P. and ors

Court : Allahabad

..... officer and are holding the charge of respective divisions, has been said to have been authorised officers for the purpose of indian forest act, 1927. 28. katarniya ghat foundation, an applicant, has moved an application for impleadment through its vice president with the submissions that the state government by notification dated 9th ..... without receiving their legal entitlement to rehabilitation prior to the 13th day of december, 2005. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in the forest (conservation) act, 1980, the central government shall provide for diversion of forest land for the following facilities managed by the government which involve felling of trees not ..... for summary eviction of unauthorised occupants and disposal of properties left on hand by such unauthorised occupants. 36. section 4 of the forest rights act, 2006 keeps notwithstanding clause and by giving overriding effect over other laws, the central government has been empowered to recognize and vest forest rights in .....

Shashi Kumar Dwivedi and Others Vs. State of U.P

Court : Allahabad

..... the government as equivalent thereto. in the face of these rules, and particularly keeping in view the provisions of the national council for teacher education act, 1993, no fault can be found with the impugned judgment of the high court that the special btc training course formulated by the state government was contrary ..... the recognition of such institutions shall be withdrawn. (h) non-compliance of the above mentioned conditions shall cause action under section 17(1) of ncte act, 1993. 3. the recognition is subject to the condition that the affiliating body shall ensure that, among other things, the institution has appointed required number of faculty ..... (hereinafter referred to as 'ncte') for starting the two years btc course under the provisions of the national council for teacher education act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ncte act') and the northern regional committee of the ncte by its letter dated 16th august, 2005 granted permission to the post graduate college under .....

M/S. Uniword Telecom Ltd. and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... 763. in the said case in view of difference of opinion on interpretation of section 34 of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institution act, 1993, the matter was directed to be placed before the hon'ble the chief justice for taking appropriate action. the said judgment also does not help the petitioners ..... a case where the authority against whom the writ is filed is shown to have had no jurisdiction or had purported to usurp jurisdiction without any legal foundation." one of the grounds on which the high court can entertain a writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india despite availability of alternative ..... laws. section 37 did not merely stop by making the provisions of the srfaesi act, 2002 in addition and to not in derogation of the companies act, 1956, the securities contracts (regulation) act, 1956, the securities and exchange board of act, 1992 and the rddbfi act, 1993, but also contained an additional (perhaps unnecessary) expression "or any other law .....

Shalini Asha Chopra Vs. Chairperson Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Court : Allahabad

..... 17/23, kamla nehru road, allahabad was executed. the account of the borrower firm became irregular and the state bank of india filed suit no.535 of 1993 against the petitioners for recovery of a sum of rs.1,41,71,528.57 together with cost and pendentelite and future interest @ 16.5% per ..... and all the rights of such bank or financial institution shall vest in such company in relation to such financial assets. (3) unless otherwise expressly provided by this act, all contracts, deeds, bonds, agreements, powers-of- attorney, grants of legal representation, permissions, approvals, consents or no-objections under any law or otherwise and other ..... and enforced by or against the securitisation company or reconstruction company, as the case may be." (emphasis supplied) thus, under section 5 of the securitisation act, any securitisation company or reconstruction company can acquire financial assets of any bank by issuing a debenture bond or any other security or by entering into an agreement .....

Kamla Sharma (Smt.) Vs. Deputy Director of Education and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2001)1UPLBEC171

..... this petition under article 226, constitution of india has been filed by one smt. kamla sharma seeking to challenge the impugned order dated november 1/2, 1993 passed by respondent no. 1/dcputy director of education deciding appeal regarding seniority in favour of respondent no. 3 (smt. usha varshaney, both working as ..... intermediate girls institution called chiranji lal girls inter college, aligarh (called the 'college'), which is, admittedly governed by the provisions of u.p. intermediate education act, 1921 (as amended up to date) and regulations framed, thereunder. copy of impugned order has been filed as (anncxure-1 to the writ petition).2. ..... academic qualification. in the instant case, there is no dispute that respondent no, 3 possessed all the requisite minimum academic qualification prescribed under the relevant act and the regulations framed thereunder at the time of appointment.9. the argument on which petitioner seeks to assail appointment of respondent no. 3 is .....