Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute manufacturers cess act 1983 section 4 crediting proceeds of duties to the consolidated fund of india Court: punjab and haryana

May 21 2002 (HC)

Gurdeep Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : II(2003)DMC148

..... died. after three days of the death of rajinder kaur, information was received by gurdev singh about the death of rajinder kaur from mohan devi, the daughter of the manufacturers of 'chaar photo naswar'. gurdeep singh and his family did not wait for gurdev singh and his family and cremated the dead body hurriedly and surreptitiously. gurdev singh gave ..... be deemed to have caused her death.explanation-for the purpose of this sub-section, 'dowry' shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961.(2) whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for ..... could attend the cremation. it was after 3 days of her death that they came to know of her death from one mohan devi who is the daughter of the manufacturers of 'chaar photo naswar', gidderbaha. it is true that it lay upon the prosecution to prove that rajinder kaur's was an unnatural death brought about by her .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 1950 (HC)

NaraIn Swadeshi Weaving Mills, Chheharta (Amritsar) Vs. Commr. of Exce ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1953P& H72

..... income-tax' : [1949]17itr308(cal) .12. the facts of that case were that the assessee company was a limited liability company carrying on business as manufacturers of the jute products. the company had let a part of its business premises to a firm doing the business of dehydrating potatoes. the question was whether the rent received by ..... is not a business within the meaning of that term as used in the income-tax act. in this act business is shortly defined as including any trade, commerce or manufacture, or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture. the question was whether tax was payable under section 9 (property) or under section ..... referring each to one accounting year, but the questions raised by each application were identical.2. the reference relates to a liability under the excess profits tax act of 1940. the assessee firm, known as narain swadeshi weaving mills, chheharta, was constituted in the year 1935, having three partners narain singh and his two .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 1986 (HC)

State of Haryana Vs. Yad Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1987P& H203

..... onslaught on this most antisocial behaviour can hope to bring relief to the nation. all remedies intended to be effective must be simple.' section 7 of this act contains a prohibition to the manufacture for sale, or store, sell or distribute either by anyone, himself or by somebody on his behalf of certain type of articles specified in that section ..... any rule made thereunder, or (b) prevents a food inspector from taking a sample as authorised by this act, or (c) prevents a food inspector from exercising any other power conferred on him by or under this act, or (d) being a manufacturer of an article of food, has in his possession, or in any of the premises occupied by him ..... rule made thereunder; or (b) prevents a food inspector from taking a sample as authorised by this act; or (c) prevents a food inspector from exercising any other power conferred on him by or under this act; or (d) being a manufacturer of an article of food, has in his possession, or in any of the premises occupied by him .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2016 (HC)

Dilawar Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... sundar singh majithia replied on behalf of the government that although the sikhs had been permitted to wear the kirpan, section 5 of the arms act did not allow them to manufacture it without licence. he also declared that the kirpans were in no case to exceed nine inches in length. consequent upon this sikhs began to ..... issued on the point. the maharaja of patiala was, however, more explicit. he ordered on 19th march, 1921, that kirpans must be bought from the arms manufacturers of the state, who were instructed to prepare kirpans of a fixed size and shape. all other kirpans possessed or carried were liable to confiscation. this order created ..... by guru gobind singh. nor was its manufacture forbidden. in schedule ii of the arms act, which provides for exemptions from the operation of the act, the kirpan is declared to be free from all prohibition!. including its manufacture and sale. for some time the sikhs freely enjoyed the right of manufacturing, selling and possessing the kirpan. but when .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2007 (HC)

Tilak Raj Madan Lal Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2007)4PLR53; (2008)16VST153(P& H)

..... it is not the petitioner who has to do it and it was required to be done by the first purchaser who had effected the purchase from the manufacturer. therefore, the controversy was settled on merit after considering various aspects. however, the tribunal on 25.2.2003 by entertaining a rectification application filed by the respondent ..... advocate general regarding production of declarations in form st xxii-a, it is not the appellant but the first purchaser(s) who had effected the purchases from the manufacturer (s), who could be required to produce such declarations. since the appellant is not liable to pay tax on the sale of bardana, this appeal is ..... the rectification application, filed under section 21a(2) of the punjab general sales tax act, 1948 (for brevity, 'the 1948 act'). the petitioner, which is a partnership firm and is engaged in the business of purchase and sale of sugar in packed jute gunny bags (bardana), has raised the aforementioned issue by challenging orders dated 25.2.2003 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 1965 (HC)

In Re: New Asiatic Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1967]37CompCas331(P& H)

..... to carry on all or any of the business of cotton spinners and doublers, flax, hemp and jute spinners, linen manufacturers, flax, hemp, jute and wood merchants, wool-combers, worsted spinners, woollen spinners, yarn merchants, worsted stuff manufacturing bleachers and dyers, makers of vitroil, bleaching and dyeing materials and to purchase, comb, prepare, spin ..... year 1956 the life insurance business of the company was taken over by the central government under the provisions of the life insurance (emergency provisions) act, 1956, and thereafter the company carried on general insurance, investment, financing and other business. due to various reasons, the earnings from the general ..... . the company ceased to accept any fresh insurance business with effect from 1st january, 1961, and, consequently, the company's registration under the insurance act, 1938, was cancelled with effect from 1st december, 1961. the company, however, continued to carry on its investment business, and its income for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 1987 (HC)

Oswal Oil and Soap Industries and anr. Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold Co ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1987(13)ECC60; 1987(12)LC621(P& H); 1987(30)ELT876(P& H)

..... v. assistant collector, central excise, 1978 e.l.t. (j 199), while setting aside the assessment of excise duty made by the excise authorities on the dye-stuffs manufactured by the appellants directed the respondents to refund to the appellants forthwith the amount collected in excess of the correct duty of excise leviable in accordance with the principles laid ..... ('the rules' for short) effective from 20th september, 1980 seeking the classification of hydrogenated rice bran oil (h.r.b.o.) manufactured by it under central excise tariff item no. 12 incorporated in the first schedule to the act. if h.r.b.o. had been classified under tariff item no. 12, it would have borne an excise duty at the ..... of central excise and ors., 1978 e.l.t. (j 180); hindustan pilkington glass works limited v. superintendent central excise, asansole and ors., 1978 e.l.t. (j 229); birla jute . and anr. v. union of india, 1981 e.l.t. 478 (mad.); jaswant sugar mills ltd. v. union of india and ors., 1983 e.l.t. 920 (all.); .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 1996 (HC)

National Co-operative Consumer Federation of India Vs. the Market Comm ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)114PLR499

..... ) of the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941 and rule 27-a of the bengal sales tax rules, 1941 observed as under:-'(9) sub-rules (3 ..... the market fee second time where he has purchased the agricultural produce for the purposes of manufacturing, extraction or for the purposes of processing.8. the case law cited by mr. j.k. sibal, senior advocate, needs to be adverted to.9. in kedarnath jute manufacturing's case (supra), the hon'ble supreme court while interpreting section 5(2)(a)(ii ..... framed under the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941 that the dealer would not be liable to pay tax once over again. the present is the situation in the case in hand where a specific provision is there as has been discussed by us. in view thereof, the judgment given in kedarnath jute manufacturing's case (supra) has got no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1975 (HC)

South Punjab Electricity Corporation Ltd. (Now Rohtak, Textile Mills L ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1976]37STC35(P& H)

..... office, sales office and godown were in delhi. it was registered as a dealer at faridabad-, both under the punjab general sales tax act, 1948, and the central sales tax act, 1956. the refrigerators manufactured by the assessee were marketed under the trade marks of 'kelvinator', 'leonard' and 'gem'. the assessee entered into three separate distribution agreements ..... view of sections 2(a), 2(dd), 4(2)(b) and 8(2)(a) of the central sales tax act, 1956, the appropriation of the goods took place when the unascertained or future goods were manufactured in accordance with the specifications of the contracts of sale, and the sales tax authorities at faridabad were entitled to ..... sale of cotton yarn and has its spinning mills, known as mohan spinning mills, at rohtak for the manufacture thereof. it is registered under the punjab general sales tax act as well as the central sales tax act, 1956, at rohtak. it maintains sales office and godown at delhi besides the one at rohtak: for the assessment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1975 (HC)

South Punjab Electricity Corporation Ltd. (Now Rohtak Textile Mills Lt ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(P& H)0138B

..... office, sales office and godown were in delhi. it was registered as a dealer at faridabad, both under the punjab general sales tax act, 1948, and the central sales tax act, 1956. the refrigerators manufactured by the assessee were marketed under the trade marks of 'kelvinator', 'leonard' and 'gem. the assessee entered into three separate distribution agreements ..... view of sections 2(a), 2(dd), 4(2)(b) and 8(2)(a) of the central sales tax act, 1956, the appropriation of the goods took place when the unascertained or future goods were manufactured in accordance with the specifications of the contracts of sale, and the sales tax authorities at faridabad were entitled to ..... sale of cotton yarn and has its spinning mills, known as mohan spinning mills, at rohtak for the manufacture thereof. it is registered under the punjab general sales tax act as well as the central sales tax act, 1956, at rohtak. it maintains sales office and godown at delhi besides the one at rohtak. for the assessment .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //