Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute manufacturers cess act 1983 section 4 crediting proceeds of duties to the consolidated fund of india Court: monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission mrtpc

In Re: Indian Ferro Alloy

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1987)62CompCas522NULL

..... ltd. is a government owned company.2. the allegation is that the ferro manganese manufacturing companies through their association, indian ferro alloy producers association (respondent no. 1) are controlling the entire supply of ferro manganese and they act in concert in fixing the prices and settling the terms and conditions respecting delivery ..... ferro manganese to respondent no. 1 whereon the association would coordinate and organise supplies. the association merely recommends equitable distribution so that not a single manufacturing unit in the country finds its survival precarious. so far as the price is concerned, according to the respondent, it is determined by bicp ..... according to respondent no. 1, negatives the possibility of collusive tendering.9. the respondent defends the rule of regulating supplies to sail by each manufacturer because the total installed and licensed capacity of all the ferro manganese producers is greater than the domestic demand.if the demand by the sail is .....

M. Balasundram Vs. Jyothi Laboratories and anr.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... of the commission through the information given by shri m. balasundram, partner of southern india trading agency, coimbatore, that the informant is also engaged in the manufacture and sale of ultramarine blue which is sold in the trade name of "regaul" and which product is also known as "regaul liquid ultramarine blue." it ..... (liquid ultramarine blue) "regaul" was alleged to be very popular in india, specially in the south. subsequently, the respondent also entered the said field and started manufacturing and selling liquid blue under the brand name "ujala". as part of a sales promotion drive, the respondent launched a publicity campaign for boosting the sales of its ..... under sections 36a, 36b(d) and 36d of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act. the notice of enquiry in so far as relevant for our purpose runs thus : "the commission has information that the first respondent is engaged in the manufacture of liquid blue in the trade name "ujala". for the purpose of promoting the .....