Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 section 8 payment of further amounts Court: gujarat Page 9 of about 82 results (0.320 seconds)

Nov 02 2004 (HC)

B.M. Rao Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)1GLR481

..... in a petition under article 226 to see that the victim is protected, and the innocent is assisted against the mighty power of state management of the company, as the case may be. if not, the impugned action of imposition of penalty finding person guilty, cannot be interfered with, as the writ ..... 14 guarantees is similarity of treatment, contra-distinguished from identical treatment. the executive authority or the administrative functionary while exercising statutory power cannot behave or act in a fanciful and arbitrary manner emanating discrimination and victimization of a party, who has the right guaranteed under the law. reasonableness and fairness are ..... the discrimination against the petitioner, the principles of parity of punishment with co-delinquents can also be invoked. the disciplinary authority cannot be permitted to act arbitrarily and work like a roman knight. it cannot be allowed a fight between david and goliath. the constitutional writ redressal is designed to interfere .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2002 (HC)

Arvind Mills Limited and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2002)3GLR624

..... of :- (a) any sale;(b) income;(c) policy or policies of insurance;(d) compensation money in respect of any acquisition and requisition or nationalisation or takeover of the management of the company;(e) any other realisation whatsoever; and they shall, in the first place, by and out of the said monies reimburse themselves and pay, ..... be properly appreciated, certain facts would be pertinent to be noted.5. arvind mills limited ('a.m.l.' for short) is a limited company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 and is mainly engaged in textiles and garment business. around 1996-97, a.m.l. undertook expansion and diversification programme for the manufacture ..... preferred in the london court, it will not be a ground for quashing the complaint. mr. shanti bhushan submitted that a petition under section 391 of the companies act cannot have any impact on prosecution. it will have only civil impact.16.4 mr. shanti bhushan submitted that so tar as other contentions are concerned, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //