Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 section 8 payment of further amounts Court: delhi Page 11 of about 438 results (0.150 seconds)

Sohan Lal Vs. Krishan Chander Ramesh Chander and Bros. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1986(2)ARBLR261(Delhi); ILR1986Delhi346

..... that case m/s. bhilwara synthetics ltd. was once a member of the association. he resigned. that resignation was not accepted with the result that the said company took the matter to a civil court on account of which the association relented and accepted the resignation. in spite of the fact that there was even litigation between ..... revoke his authority can be given on the application of a person who has that apprehension. it was so held in m/s. amarchand lalit kumar v. shree ambica jute mills ltd., : [1963]2scr953 . however, a note of caution was attached to the effect that before a court exercises its discretion to give leave to revoke ..... biased, were baseless. the result was that the petition of the said company under section 5 of the limitation act for permission to revoke the authority of the arbitrator was dismissed. during the pendency of the petition, the arbitrator had recorded ex-parte evidence against that company. with the consent of the association it was held that the proceedings .....

Chandro Devi and ors. Vs. Jit Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2(1988)ACC467

..... and they were proceeded ex-parte. at the time of accident both the vehicles were insured with m/s. calcutta insurance limited. after the nationalisation of the general insurance in india, the said company was later on represented by national insurance co. ltd. respondent jit singh filed written statement. in his written statement it has been alleged ..... were crushed under the truck. as a result six passengers had died. the heirs of the deceased bad filed petitions under the act thereby claiming compensation. the claim was resisted by the insurance company on the ground that the truck was insured with it only as goods vehicle and the policy had not covered the use of ..... no. pnq-2409 was owned by respondent avtar singh.4. the appellants filed an application, being suit no. 316 of 1968, under section 110-a of the act before the motor accident claims tribunal, delhi thereby claiming a compensation of rs. one lakh as the legal representatives and dependents of the deceased. in the application, it .....

Kerala State Mktg.Fed.Ltd. Vs Union of IndiA.

Court : Delhi

..... up to/the time of acceptance". it further clarifies that the plaintiff may, in its interest, " get the consignments insured at their own expense through some insurance company. govt. will, under no circumstances, assume any responsibility for the shortage or loss to the consignment before the consignment or any part thereof is accepted " a cardinal ..... up to/the time of acceptance. the seller may in their own interest if they so desire, get the consignments insured at their own expense through some insurance company. govt. will, under no circumstances, assume any responsibility for the shortage or loss to the consignment before the consignment or any part thereof is accepted irrespective ..... not relate to any legal character or right to property it could not be claimed under section 42 of the specific relief act. these views were affirmed and applied by the allahabad high court, in mahabir jute mills v. firm kedar nath ram bharose, air 1960 all 254, and also by the bombay high court, in shanta .....

Indian Gas Cylinders Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1990]32ITD749(Delhi)

..... claimed that, it carries on two activities, one was manufacturing of gas cylinders and the other was job-work of manufacture of gas cylinders for the three petroleum companies, viz., indian oil corporation, baharat petroleum corporation and hindustan petroleum corporation. both these activities were recognised by the concerned licencing authorities, as well as, the ..... packaging the liquid gas and it was only the gas that was sold and not the cylinder itself. he also placed reliance on the supreme court ruling in kedarnath jute mfg. co. ltd. v. cit : [1971]82itr363(sc) , for the proposition that, the liability came to be fastened on the assessed, by means of ..... sales tax laws of the appropriate state are empowered to make assessments, reassessments, revisions, collected and enforce payment of tax, including any penalty payable under this act, as they are to carry out under the general sales tax laws of that state. it further states that, for these purposes the authorities may exercise of .....

Asian Hotels Ltd., Bhikaji Cama Place Vs. D.D.A. Vikas Minar, I.P.Esta ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1998IVAD(Delhi)708; 1998(46)DRJ310

..... paragraph 14 of the plaint, it is stated:-'the memorandum of association of the plaintiff was subscribed by seven persons in accordance with the requirements of the companies act. although the company has been promoted by shri c.l.jhunjhnuwala, shri r.s.saraf, shri c.l.gupta and shri r.k.jatia, they had not subscribed to ..... swept away the subtle distinctions wrongly thought to exist in the common law and thought to depend on the form of signature by the purported agent, when acting for the unformed company. these distinctions were founded, in particular, on kelner v. baxter and newborne v. sensolid(great britain) ltd., decisions which can be regarded as overruled ..... is that of the parties making it. the adoption and confirmation by a directors' resolution of a contract made before the incorporation of the company by persons purporting to act on its behalf does not create any contractual relation between it and the other party to the contract or impose any obligation on it towards him .....

Rajeev Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1232; 2007(94)DRJ34; 2007(218)ELT200(Del)

..... claim of drawback whether the goods had been exported to moscow directly or had been sent through finland. reliance was also placed by the counsel on jute investment company v. s.k. srivastava reported at 77 cwn 501 to urge that destination was not a material particular and hence, the alleged wrong declaration, if ..... amounted to mis-declaration in respect of 'material particular' and has accordingly rendered the goods liable for confiscation under section 113(i) of the customs act. respondents contend that the petitioner submitted shipping bills with the entry 'port of discharge' as moscow while the corresponding bill of lading and airway bills proved ..... on him. the order is sought to be challenged at the pre-execution stage itself. proceedings have also been initiated under section 7 of the cofeposa act before the additional chief metropolitan magistrate. in the said proceedings, petitioner had initially been granted interim protection for the purpose of presenting himself before the trial .....

Sunder Grover Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2009(244)ELT173(Del); ILR1984Delhi406

..... cases the question was as to when an order is passed under section 237(b) of companies act 1956 to appoint inspectors to investigate the affairs of the company. now section 237(b) could only be invoked if central government was of the opinion that there are circumstances suggesting that the ..... conducted with intent to defraud its creditors members, etc. it was because of this condition precedent before passing the order under section 237(b) of companies act that the court laid down that 'the formation of the opinion is subjective but the existence of the circumstances relevant to the inference as the sine ..... before the court by the respondent to justify its action the said order must be castigated as arbitrary and unsustainable. (17) sorabjee seeks support from barium chemicals ltd. v. company law board. : [1967]1scr898 and rohtas industries ltd. v. s. d. agarwal; : [1969]3scr108 . in oar opinion those cases are clearly distinguishable. in those .....

District Excise Officer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (2001)68TTJ(Del)436

..... of section 206c 'seller' means the central government, state government or any local authority or corporation or authority established by under a central/state or provincial act or any company or firm or co-operative society. in view of the explanationn, deo, the seller, is liable to deduct the tax at source on purchase price of ..... of section 206c 'seller' means the central government, state government, or any local authority or corporation or authority established by under a central/state or provincial act or any company or firm or co-operative society. in view of the explanationn, deo, the seller, is liable to deduct the tax at source on purchase price of ..... thus a person by whom any tax or any other sum of money is payable under the act.person : 'the expression 'person' as defined in section covers individual, huf, company, a firm, assessing officer personal, local authority and every artificial juridical person.'''assessment : assessment has not been defined in the sense as in the .....

Pearson Education Inc. (Formerly Prentice Hall Inc.) Vs. Prentice Hall ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 134(2006)DLT450; 2005(84)DRJ455

..... thereafter, pearson also filed a petition being cp no. 73/2003 before the clb under sections 397/398, 402, 406 and 408 of the companies act (in short the 'act') alleging certain acts of oppression and mismanagement. this petition has been disposed of vide impugned order dated 6th july 2004 aggrieved against certain findings in the judgment, pearson ..... found by the clb. no doubt, interest of the company is paramount in proceedings under section 397-398 of theact, as held in nurcombe v. nurcombe and anr. 85(1) all. e.r. 65, mohanlal ganpatram v. sayaji jubilee cotton and jute mills co. ltd., . however, wisdom of clb's remarks was questioned by the learned ..... counsel for the petitioner, and rightlyso, by submitting that under the garb that it would be against the interest of the company the company cannot be allowed to take what is not legitimately due .....

Eastern Linkers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dina Nath Sodhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1984]55CompCas462(Delhi); 1982(3)DRJ239

..... been regular.' but this rule is not applicable to the present case. the reason is that this section which is equivalent to s. 143 of the english companies act, 1929, and s. 180 of the companies act, 1948, cannot apply to a transaction where a director or a de facto director invokes the rule so as to validate a transaction which was in fact ..... up, for otherwise, it may affect the venture in which he was 1/3rd partner. on this basis, a suggestion was given based on s. 443(2) of the companies act which provides that where a petition is presented on just and equitable grounds the court may refuse to make an order of winding up if it is of the opinion ..... who was purported to have been elected at an invalid meeting, the said action lacked in validity. mr. talwar, however, sought to invoke s. 290 of the companies act to say that any act done by or purported to be done by a director is valid notwithstanding that it may afterwards be discovered that his appointment was invalid by any reason of .....