Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 section 22 disbursement of amounts to the companies Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 3 results (0.642 seconds)

industrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. the Cannanore Spinnin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC1841; 2002(3)ALD113(SC); 2002(2)ARBLR676(SC); II(2002)BC430(SC); [2002]110CompCas685(SC); (2002)4CompLJ337(SC); JT2002(4)SC318; (2002)3MLJ144(SC); 2002(3)SCALE574;

..... of any suit on behalf of the plaintiff against the defendants, when all assets of the first defendant - company have vested in the government of india under the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and the compensation for the vesting of the mills in the government has already been declared. the plea ..... a. tamplin steamship co. ltd. v. anglo maxican petroleum products co. ltd. 1916 2 ac 397 (which stands quoted (with approval by this court) in naihati jute mills v. khyaliram : [1968]1scr821 , seems to have settled the law on the same. lord loreburn in tamplin steamship stated:'a court can and ought to ..... manner of application in the contextual facts. recapitulating the facts briefly, the nationalisation act came into force in the year 1974 by reason of which the assets of a debtor company stand vested on the state. in terms of the provisions of the nationalisation act, there was appointed a commissioner of payments and by reason of the factum .....

National Jute Manufacturers Corporation Ltd. Vs. Kotihar Mazdoor Sangh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC1746; 2001(49)BLJR1173; [2001(89)FLR1038]; JT2001(5)SC59; 2001LabIC1734; (2001)IILLJ264SC; 2001(3)SCALE356; (2001)4SCC408; [2001]2SCR1177; 2001(2)SCT735(SC)

..... . however they will not get any arrears on that count.3. rai bahadur hurdut ray motilal jute mills pvt. ltd. (for short 'the mill') had remained closed from 25.2.1975 to 17.8.1979. on coming into force of the jute companies (nationalisation) act, 1980 (for short the 'nationalisation act') it stood transferred and vested in the central government with effect from 21.121.1980. in ..... turn the central government under the provisions of the said act transferred the mill to the national jute manufacturers corporation limited (for short the 'corporation'). though the provisions of the .....

Workmen of Kettlewell Bullen and Co. Ltd. Vs. Kettlewell Bullen and Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC1550; 1995(1)BLJR119; (1994)2CALLT19(SC); [1994(68)FLR302]; (1995)ILLJ1201SC; 1994(1)SCALE30; (1994)2SCC357a; [1994]1SCR22; 1994(3)SLJ194(SC); 1994(2)LC184(SC); (1

..... that the bonus was not paid in any year of loss and it was also observed that the concept of any customary bonus was unknown to nationalised banks and that in all the nationalised banks which are wholly owned undertakings of the government of india, the employees must be dealt with on a common denominator in the matter of ..... 31st december, 1970, 31st december, 1971 and 31st december, 1972. under the said settlement it was agreed as under :(a) all the clerical and subordinate staff of the company working at 21, strand road, calcutta-1, will be paid bonus in respect of each of the accounting years ending 31st december, 1970, 31st december, 1971 and 31st ..... cannot therefore affect the rights and obligations belonging to a different world or claims and conditions. (p.647)25. in hukam chand jute mills ltd. case (supra) while referring to section 17 of the bonus act, this court has observed :section 17 in express terms refers to puja bonus and other customary bonus as available for deduction from .....

Dipak Kumar Chatterjee Vs. Commissioner of Payments (Jute) and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1993SC1264; JT1993(1)SC58; 1993(1)SCALE16; (1993)1SCC434

..... 1989. the grievance of the appellant is that by the said order, the high court has given a free hand to the commissioner under section 17 of the jute companies [nationalisation] act, 1980 [the 'act'] to deal with the claim of the appellant, as and when filed, as the commissioner thought fit to do. the implication of the order is that the commissioner ..... decretal claim, only within the bounds of the provisions of sections 17 and 18 of the act. the order dated 12th april, 1989 being without jurisdiction is void and is hereby set aside. the respondent-commissioner is directed to examine the decretal claim of the ..... order of 12th april, 1989.2. we find from his order of 12th april, 1989 that the commissioner has gone beyond the provisions of section 17 of the act inasmuch as he has tried to investigate the merits and the validity of the appellant's claim decreed by the high court. the commissioner has to examine the said .....

Fine Knitting Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1987SC167; [1986]60CompCas1083(SC); JT1986(1)SC450; 1986(2)SCALE442; (1986)4SCC276; 1986(2)LC610(SC)

..... over of management) ordinance and then under the sick textile undertakings (take over of management) act. this was followed by its nationalisation under the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act. the take over of management and the subsequent nationalisation are questioned in this writ petition which was originally filed in the high court of gujarat ..... and distinct undertakings and, therefore, the hosiery undertaking which would not fall within the definition of a textile undertaking could not be taken over and nationalised. another submission of shri tarkunde was that by the judgment dated september 17, 1986 in transfer case no. 29 of 1983. date of ..... undertakings (taking over of management) act and the deeming provision in section 4(3) of that act. 'textile'is defined as including 'yarn or fabrics made either wholly or partly of cotton, wool, jute, synthetic and artificial (man-made) fabrics.' 'textile company' is denned as meaning 'a company specified in the third column of the .....

The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Hyderabad and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC1303

..... 2, challenging the validity of the orders passed by appellant no. 2 under section 68d (2) of the motor vehicles act (no. 4 of 1939) (hereinafter called the act) on the 18th october, 1960 approving schemes for the nationalisation of bus transport in the area of guntur. it appears that appellant no. 1 published in the andhra pradesh gazette on ..... to him. it is in this angry frame of mind that the minister heard the objections filed by the respective transport operators and decided the matter against ramakotaiah's company. that, in brief, is the nature of the story set out by ramakotaiah in support of his plea that the minister had a bias against him, and was ..... allegation made by ramakotaiah, and we are in agreement with the view taken by the high court. it appears that out of the seven shareholder of the respondent company, ramakotaiah, alone was a permanent resident of narasaraopet; and it seems to us extremely unlikely that he could have booked a trunk call to the minister's number .....

M/s. Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Ltd. Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigatio ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of allocation of coal blocks for captive use under section 3(3) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 is not to enable free trading of coal by private companies. the basic concept of captive mining permitted under the aforesaid act is that the coal obtained from a captive block shall be used entirely and exclusively for the ..... - in exercise of the powers conferred by item(4) of subclause (ill) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 3 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 (26 of 1973) the central government hereby specifies as an end use the supply of coal from the coal mines of kiloni, manoradeep and baranj i-iv blocks ..... range of 4200 to 4940 kcal/kg as per goi notification. xxxxx article2the company and its objectives1 the parties of this agreement shall form and incorporate the company as a public limited company under the companies act, 1956 having its registered office at bangalore.2. the company shall be named karnataka emta coal mines limited; or in case such name .....

Air India Statutory Corporation, Etc. Vs. United Labour Union and Othe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC645; (1997)3GLR2576; (1997)ILLJ1113SC; 1996(9)SCALE70; (1997)9SCC377; [1996]Supp9SCR579

..... . l. abu kavur bai and ors. etc. : [1984]1scr725 , the same interpretation was given by anr. constitution bench upholding nationalisation of state carriages and contract carriages (acquisition) act. therefore, all state actions should be such to make socio-economic democracy with liberty, equality and fraternity, a reality to all the ..... constitution of india. in central inland water transport corporation ltd. and anr. v. brojonath ganguly and anr. : (1986)iillj171sc , a government company incorporated under companies act was held to be an instrumentality or agency. in this case, this court construed the fundamental rights under articles 14 to 17, the directive ..... (to which one of us, k. ramaswamy j., was a member) was to consider the constitutionality of jute packing material act, 1987. the law was made to protect the agriculturists cultivating jute and jute products. in that context it was held thus:the agriculturists have fundamental rights to social justice and economic empowerment .....

Charan Lal Sahu Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC1480; (1990)1CompLJ125(SC); JT1989(4)SC582; 1991(2)SCALE841; (1990)1SCC613; [1989]Supp2SCR597

..... the political, economic, financial, social and legal questions. the code provides for disclosure of information to the host countries and it also provides guidelines for nationalisation and compensation, obligations to international law and jurisdiction of courts. the code lays down provisions for settlement of disputes between the host states and an affiliate ..... on certain important legal questions of far-reaching importance said to arise in the appeals as to the principles of liability of monolithic, economically entrenched multinational companies operating with inherently dangerous technologies in the developing countries of the third world? these questions were said to be of great contemporary relevance to the ..... to be understood that it is in respect of the person responsible, being the person in-charge-of the ucil and the parent company ucc. this interpretation of the act is further strengthened by the fact that a 'claimant' has been defined in clause (c) of section 2 as a person who .....