Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 preamble 1 jute companies nationalisation act 1980 Court: chennai Page 3 of about 77 results (0.153 seconds)

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

..... examined by the superintendent. for the purpose of this rule, the term, 'legal advisor' means a legal practitioner within the meaning of legal practitioners act, 1879 (central act xviii of 1879).?.75. chapter 30 deals with transfers. rules, 568, 570 and 571 are as follows:- 568.grounds, reasons and circumstances of ..... with their relatives, friends, and legal advisers. provided that in respect of accused or undertrial prisoners under the terrorists and disruptive (prevention) activities act 1987 (central act 28 of 1987) the relatives and friends, who desire to interview them, shall produce a certificate from the concerned village administrative officer or member ..... to trichy central prison, without any authority. at this juncture, this court deems it fit to extract the relevant provisions, from the prisons act, 1894 prisoners act 1900, and the rules framed thereunder, enabling the prison authorities to have an effective control over the prisoners, in the prisons. they are responsible .....

K. Singaram Vs. the United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1990)ILLJ603Mad

..... government within the purview of section 4(1)(c) of the tamil nadu shops and establishments act. hence, the appeal filed by the writ petitioner before the second respondent was unsustainable as he ..... covered by section 4(1)(c) of the act and, therefore, it is exempted from the provision of the act. the reasoning of the supreme court in c. v. raman, etc. etc. v. bank of india, etc. etc. : (1988)iillj423sc will apply with equal force to nationalised insurance companies and they will also be establishment under the central ..... june, 1980. he filed an appeal to the general manager of the company on 18th august, 1980 which was rejected by order dated 28th january, 1981. thereafter he filed an appeal under section 41(2) of the tamil nadu shops and establishment act before the second respondent. one of the objections raised by the first .....

M/s. Masterstroke Freight Forwarders Pvt Limited Vs. The Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

..... regulation 11, which reads as under:- 11. obligations of customs broker:- a customs broker shall- (a) obtain an authorisation from each of the companies, firms or individuals by whom he is for the time being employed as a customs broker and produce such authorisation whenever required by the deputy commissioner ..... the affairs of the customs broker including the revocation of the licence. the regulations contemplates action against the customs broker dehors the provisions under the customs act. therefore, the regulations cannot be treated as sub-ordinate legistlation. moreover, every implementing authority of any fiscal statute is only performing a public duty ..... the conclusion that the customs broker failed to fulfill the obligation cast upon them under the regulations mentioned to therein and committed professional misconduct, while acting as custom broker. therefore, relying upon the above emphasized portion in the show cause notice, the learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that .....

Swadeshi Cotton Mills Thozhilalar Shemanala Padukappu Union Represente ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1984)1MLJ228

..... undertaking, an undertaking of the central government itself. there is no dispute before us that the mills has not come within the mischief of nationalisation under the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act lvii of 1974. as taken note of by the allahabad high court in national textile corporation v. industrial tribunal (1979) l.i.c. ..... section 18-e (2) specifies that subject to the exceptions, restrictions and limitations by the central government, as may be specified in the notification, the companies act shall continue to apply to such under-takings. section 18-f speaks about the power of the central government to cancel a notified order under section 18- ..... them only. the bench also took note of the fact their neither the memorandum and articles of association of the mills, nor the provisions of the companies act stood abrogated altogether. finally, the bench held that the industry in respect of the two mills, on account of their management being taken over in accordance .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Tamilnadu Magnesite Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2001]258ITR324(Mad)

..... facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appellate tribunal is right in holding that the liability of the assessee under the employees provident fund act had accrued to the assessee-company during the previous year and the assessee would be entitled to a deduction of rs. 15,53,124 ?' 2. in view of the supreme court ..... the provisions with effect from january 17, 1979. the assessee took the stand that it was entitled to infancy protection under section 16(1)(b) of the provident fund act. the provident fund commissioner rejected the contention. therefore, the assessee made a provision for the liability of rs. 15,53,124 as on march 31, 1980. the ..... ), however, allowed the appeal of the assessee based upon the supreme court decision reported in the case of kedarnath jute . v. cit : [1971]82itr363(sc) . the tribunal took the view that the liability under the provident fund act had accrued to it in the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1980-81. in the circumstances, the question .....

Union Bank of India and Ors. Vs. Additional Commissioner for Workmen's ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1984)ILLJ456Mad

..... of industries and institutions ...... the government, its agencies and instrumentalities, the corporations set up by the government under statutes and corporations incorporated under the companies act but owned by the government have thus become the biggest employers in the country. there is no good reason why, if government is bound to observe ..... the category of establishments under the central govt. referred to in s. 4(1) of the shops act. thus, the main question for consideration is whether the nationalised banks, i.e., banks constituted under act 5 of 1970, are establishments under the central govt. as contended for by the petitioner-banks.4. as ..... act with the government and that the nationalised bank as legal person has got a right to hold and acquire property, is liable to income-tax as any other indian citizen and in the manner of day-to-day administration and appointing and dismissing officers and staff, it has full freedom and that as such it is not under the government. a company .....

Chelpark Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1991)94CTR(Mad)71; [1991]191ITR249(Mad)

..... associated portland cement . v. kerr (h. m. inspector of taxes) [1945] 27 tc 103 , relied on by learned counsel for the revenue. the assessee-company paid certain amounts to two of its retiring directors who had exceptional knowledge of the cement industry and important business contacts, on the basis of covenants entered into with them ..... , the character of the expenditure involved in purchasing loom hours came to be decided. therein, with a view to protect the trade of the members of the jute mills association, a working time agreement was entered into between the members, placing a restriction on the number of working hours per week for which the member-mills ..... supreme court upheld the capital natural of the expenditure incurred by the assessee as well as its disallowance under section 10(2)(xv) of the indian income-tax act, 1922. applying the aforesaid principles to the present case, it follows that the expenditure incurred by the assesses was in the nature of capital expenditure. in .....

Andritz Oy, Rep. Through Power of Attorney Agent, Mr. Siraj Ahmad Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR545(Madras)

..... the plaintiff has taken a stand that the second defendant is governed by its own memorandum and articles of association as well as the provisions of the companies act, 1956 and that, therefore, the joint venture agreement and the memorandum of understanding are unenforceable. paragraph 23 of the plaint narrates the cause of action, ..... memorandum of understanding, being at the most, agreements between the shareholders, could still be enforced de hors the articles of association of the company and the statutory provisions of the companies act, 1956 ?26. apart from the above main issues, certain ancillary issues have also been raised, which are as follows:(a) whether a ..... are void ab initio. dealing with a case where a contract got frustrated and became impossible of performance, attracting section 56 of the contract act, the supreme court held in naihati jute mills ltd. v. khyaliram jagannath (1968) 2 scj 907, as follows:but assuming that the appellants had established frustration even then it .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Chemicals and Plastics (i) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1989]179ITR269(Mad)

..... as 'the act'), the following common question of law for the assessment year 1968-69 to 1972-73, has been referred for the opinion of this court : 'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the entire royalty paid by the assessee to its foreign collaborator, b. f. goodrich chemical company, under the ..... expenditure, but that it would only be revenue expenditure and, therefore, the tribunal was right in its conclusion. our attention in this connection was drawn to the decisions in empire jute co. ltd. v. cit : [1980]124itr1(sc) ; cit v. sundaram clayton ltd. : [1982]136itr315(mad) and cit v. madras rubber factory ltd. : [1983]144itr678(mad) ..... skill relating to improvements in the methods and techniques of manufacture of pvc resins and compounds. we are of the view that the decision of the supreme court in empire jute co. ltd. v. cit : [1980]124itr1(sc) , relied on by learned counsel for the assessee, would have and important bearing on this question. the assessee .....

Indian Bank Vs. V.A. Balasubramania Gurukkal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1984]56CompCas41(Mad)

..... the rbi from time to time. in addition it was also submitted that the provisions of the usurious loans act did not contemplate a nationalised bank or a banking company regulated by the banking regulations act but only an ordinary creditor who has a freedom of sharing different rates of interest for different types of debtors ..... hundred rupees for every day during the continuance of the contravention. a consideration of the aforesaid provisions of the banking regulation act, 1949, clearly points out that a banking company, more particularly, a nationalised bank like the petitioner, has really no free scope for carrying on the business of banking permitted under the provisions ..... of the banking regulation act in any manner it likes, but every activity is hedged in by and subject to the control of .....