Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1985)2MLJ439
..... matter came up before our learned brother, ramanujam, j. the learned judge, on an analysis of the provisions of the shops act and on going through the important provisions of banking companies (acquisition of undertakings) act, 1970 hereinafter referred to as the nationalisation act, came to the conclusion that the bank of india was an establishment under the government of india, and therefore section 4 ..... between the government and the employees, need not detain us.29. originally, banking companies were governed by part x-a of the companies act, 1930. in 1949, the banking regulation act was enacted. therefore part x-a was repeated. under the banking regulation act, the reserve bank exercised several controls. by nationalisation act (central act v of 1970), if a change was brought about in the structure of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1984)ILLJ456Mad
..... of industries and institutions ...... the government, its agencies and instrumentalities, the corporations set up by the government under statutes and corporations incorporated under the companies act but owned by the government have thus become the biggest employers in the country. there is no good reason why, if government is bound to observe ..... the category of establishments under the central govt. referred to in s. 4(1) of the shops act. thus, the main question for consideration is whether the nationalised banks, i.e., banks constituted under act 5 of 1970, are establishments under the central govt. as contended for by the petitioner-banks.4. as ..... act with the government and that the nationalised bank as legal person has got a right to hold and acquire property, is liable to income-tax as any other indian citizen and in the manner of day-to-day administration and appointing and dismissing officers and staff, it has full freedom and that as such it is not under the government. a company .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : 1986(23)ELT363(Mad)
..... 6 - " 9 " 5 " 38 " 35 " 39 " 40 " 61 -----------------------------------------------------------------------36. the provisions relating to the powers of officers under the customs act, the gold (control) act, and other central acts are analogous to some of the provisions contained in the criminal procedure code, whereunder the police officers have to investigate into the offences in compliances with those provisions as ..... the supreme court in eknath v. state of maharashtra , while examining the question whether the officer under the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 (central act no. 37 of 1954), is vested with the power of "investigation" within the meaning of that expression as occurring in section ..... under section 377(1), criminal procedure code relating to an offence investigated by the forest officers under the provisions of the indian forest act (a central act) was not competent.44. before a division bench of the bombay high court in state of maharashtra v. laxmichand barhomal .....
Tag this Judgment!