Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Year: 1960 Page 38 of about 434 results (0.197 seconds)

Ranchhod Mula Vs. State

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1961CriLJ472

..... of an officer of the mint upon any matter or thing duly submitted to him for examination or analysis and report may be used as evidence in an inquiry, trial or other proceeding under the code. it is therefore necessary that the document must purport to be a report under the hand of an officer of the ..... him, the bundle containing the articles was lying outside his house. the appellant was kept outside and the panchanama was made in another house, the learned assistant sessions judge accepted the prosecution case, rejected the defence case and found that the articles in? question were in the possession of the appellant, that the appellant knowingly counterfeited or ..... no application to cases of improper admission or rejection of evidence. in the case of improper admission or rejection of evidence provisions of section 167 of the evidence act would apply. that section reads as under:the improper admission or rejection of evidence shall not be ground of itself for a new trial or reversal of any .....

Kanumuri Anji Raju and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961AP123

..... sufferers could not confer any rights which were enforceable in a court of law and the propriety of the decision of the darkhast authority acting within its powers could not be questioned by a civil court. the learned judge has referred to the decisions of the madras high court which have established this proposition. 11. there is another ruling of this court ..... madras, : air1959sc694 . it was ruled by their lordships that the instructions issued by the government from time to time under section 43-a of the motor vehicles act, 1939 (as amended by the amendment act xx of 1948), were in the nature of administrative directions and not rules of law affecting the rights of parties. this judgment also furnishes an answer to .....

Bhagwan Sitaram Vs. Namdeo Narayan

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR289a

..... other enactment for the time being in force, and, therefore, so far as the provisions of the c.p. and berar courts act, are concerned, they deal with only the ordinary jurisdiction of the district judge, that is to say, with regard to suits and other proceedings which can be commenced under the code of civil procedure but not ..... relating to which or to the endowment whereof, any suit shall be instituted or application made under. the provisions of this act.therefore, the contention on behalf of the respondents may perhaps be justified if the district judge had been taking the action as was taken in the present case, because by virtue of section 17(1) (c) of ..... justifying * the order passed by the additional district judge.9. then mr. manohar referred to the provisions of sections 26 and 27 of the madhya pradesh public trusts act, 1951 (xxx of 1951). undoubtedly, section 27 of that , act gives power to the court to make or cause to be made such inquiry against a trustee in a case of this kind .....

Shafia Begum Kom Mahmad Sahib MomIn Vs. Bashir Ahmed Maulvi Mahmed Han ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1962)64BOMLR462

..... 1949 is binding on the plaintiffs. consequently, it dismissed the plaintiffs' suit. from that decision, the plaintiffs went in appeal to the district court and the district judge having confirmed the decision of the trial court, the plaintiffs have preferred the present second appeal.2. the principal point urged by mr. peerbhoy, for the appellants, ..... be binding on the infant's property. they also help to explain and illustrate the extent of such de facto guardians' powers. the permissibility of these acts depends on the emergency which gives rise to the imperative necessity for incurring liabilities without which the life of the child or his perishable goods and chattels ..... partner may be an agent of the other partners arid in that capacity he can claim the right to participate in the management of the partnership. the act of referring disputes to arbitration is not incidental to the management of the business. for choosing a domestic forum all partners must necessarily concur. such a .....

P. Subbarao and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Hyd ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961AP378

..... tribunal deciding the matter. it was also remarked that this question could not be determined with reference to preconceived notions or a priori considerations and that it should be judged in the light of the relevant rules.33. this doctrine has been re-affirmed in the subsequent cases of the supreme court and it is not necessary to refer ..... but before we do that, it has got to be observed that the question whether rules of natural justice have been observed in a particular case must itself be judged in the light of the constitution of the statutory body which has to function in accordance with the rules laid down by the legislature and in that sense the ..... every kind of domestic tribunal. the requirements of natural justice must depend on the circum-stances of the case, the nature of the inquiry, the rules under which the tribunal is acting, the subject-matter that is being dealt with, and so forth'. in the earlier case of general medical council v. spademan, 1943 ac 627 at p. 638, lord .....

N.S. Gandiwal S/O Gopal Swarup Bhatnagar Vs. State Through Anti-corrup ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1961CriLJ670

..... case beyond all reasonable doubt.this principle is now almost uniforrnally accepted and it should not be necessary to cite authorities in support of it. the learned special judge himself has adverted to this principle in his judgment. it, however, appears that while discussing the probabilities of the case this principle was not clearly kept in ..... accused having prevented this design by insisting on execution of separate rent-notes prior to the acceptance of the arrears of rent was in my opinion doing an act which could not but have aroused the displeasure of bhagwandas and his guide and friend hukumchand. i find it difficult, in the circumstances of this case, to ..... .13. while, therefore, i am conscious of the! factors which are inconsistent with, the theory set up by the defence and to which the learned special judge seems to have given such undue importance, i am distinctly of the opinion teat they are altogether insufficient for excluding the probability of the version of the accused .....

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ganga Singh and Ghamandi Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1961CriLJ122

..... cr. p.c. the special judge must be deemed to be empowered, by necessary intendment, to frame a ..... charge.6. in my opinion the special judge cannot fey an accused without framing a charge. it is obvious ..... the trial without it.it is true that the act does not provide for framing a charge and in the cri. p.c. also there is no provision for a sessions judge to frame a charge, although he may add, alter or amend the charge framed by the inquiry magistrate. if a trial under the act is to commence under section 271 of the .....

Thokehom Angou Singh Vs. the Union Territory of Manipur and anr.

Court : Guwahati

..... for violation of the order under section 144 to wait for his conviction by the magistrate, before filing a revision to the high court or to the sessions judge unde section 435, cr.p.c.18. it was next pointed out by the government advocate that, in any case, the entire ordeg of the district ..... was carrying on propaganda through speech writing, meetings and processions.the district magistrate passed the order on 23-4-60 as stated in annexure b for immediate prevention of acts of violence which he had information were likely. speeches, assembly of more than 5 persons, publishing and printing of pamphlets and leaflets, use of loud-speaker, ..... and material and dependable information from others that the socialist party, communist party and other interested groups of individuals have organised a movement inter alia for committing acts of vio-fence and preventing the people, including persons in the employ of the govt. and other authorities and institutions, from attending to their normal work .....

Aga Abbas Haji AmIn Anwari Vs. Haji Mohomed Haji Ali Jeerahiyan

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR465

..... set out in sections 8b to 8d. of course, where the plaint itself discloses an objective standard, it may not be necessary for him to make such an inquiry but where, as here, the judge has not regarded the plaint as furnishing an objective standard, he cannot base his conclusion upon any material other than that placed on record in an ..... conclusion as to the value of the suit for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction. it is abundantly clear that the learned judge purported to exercise the power given by section 8a of the court-fees act to consider whether the suit was properly valued for the purpose of court-fees. now, this section, while it empowers the court ..... inquiry made by him under the provisions of sections 8b to 8d of the act.5. i may point out that in kashinath v. tukaram a.i.r.[1956] nag. 195, .....

Dada Savla Yadav Vs. Vasant Anant Sultane

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR471

..... no. 1 was apparently worded so as not to attract the provisions contained in section 70 of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1948 (which will hereafter be referred to as the tenancy act), virtually, the inquiry in the suit must necessarily lead to a finding on the question whether the defendant was a tenant or not. on this ground ..... if, on the other hand, the civil court comes to the conclusion that the defendant proves his allegation that the surrender was a nominal surrender never intended to be acted upon, the plaintiff would obviously be not entitled to any decree because, as already indicated, there is no dispute between the parties that the defendant was a tenant ..... , as amended by act xiii of 195(3. the respondents, who are plaintiffs, filed special civil suit no. 19 of 1957 on march 20, 1957, in the court of the civil judge, senior division, at kolhapur for possession of two lands bearing r. s. nos. 582 and 583 admeasuring 6 acres 17 gunthas and 9 acres 34 gunthas .....