Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Court: us supreme court Year: 1967 Page 5 of about 89 results (0.268 seconds)

Treogi Nath Vs. the Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC205; (1968)ILLJ1SC; [1968]1SCR97

..... same nature as the provision made by s. 13(2) of the bengal, agra and assam civil courts act in respect of subordinate judges or munsifs, and since subordinate judges and munsifs can exercise jurisdiction by virtue of s. 13(1) of that act to decide civil suits, it should be held that labour courts, by virtue of their constitution under s. ..... two or more subordinate judges or to two or more munsifs, to assign to each of them such civil ..... limits of the jurisdiction of any civil court under that act. it was urged by him that this provision was similar to the provision contained in s. 7(1) of the act. section 13(2) of the bengal, agra and assam civil courts act thereafter gives the power to the district judge, in cases where same local jurisdiction is assigned to .....

Municipal Council, Raichur Vs. Amar Chand Prasanna Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC255; [1968]1SCR87

..... new octroi rules and bye-laws are finalised under mysore municipalities act, 1964.' 8. but this resolution was amended on march 25, 1966, and second paragraph was substituted by the following paragraph :- 'further the committed resolved ..... it was unanimously resolved to levy the octroi duty on all the goods imported within municipal limits of raichur under the schedule ii of mysore municipalities act, 1964, from the first day of april 1966. further the committee resolved that the hyderabad district municipalities octroi rules, 1959, will continue till the ..... unanimously to confirm the recommendations of the standing committee dated june 11, 1965. on october 27, 1965 the notification under s. 95 of the act by the municipality inviting objections to the proposals to impose octroi tax was published. no objections were received from any resident of the municipality against the .....

M.M. Ipoh and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC317; [1968]67ITR106(SC); [1968]1SCR65

..... close of the year 1951-52 an association of persons was actually formed. 28. we are not called upon in these appeals to consider whether the learned judges of the high court were right in the view which they have taken insofar as it relates to the assessment year 1951-52. we are only called ..... to the scheme of the act. under the act of 1922 the income-tax officer is require to issue a general notice calling upon all persons whose total income during the previous year exceeds the minimum ..... association or the members individually as entities in bringing to tax the income earned by the association. guidance may still be gathered from the other provision of the act, its scheme, policy and purpose, and the surrounding circumstances which necessitated the legislation. in considering whether the policy or principles are disclosed, regard must be had .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. A. Raman and Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC49; [1968]67ITR11(SC); [1968]1SCR10

..... assessment; and (ii) that it is in consequence of information which he has in his possession and that he has reason so to believe. since the learned judges of the high court have concentrated their attention upon the second branch of the condition and have reached their conclusion in favour of the assessees on that branch, ..... that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment, the income-tax officer has jurisdiction to assess or reassess income under s. 147(1)(b) of the income-tax act, 1961. information in his possession that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment furnishes a starting point for assessing or reassessing income. if he has that information, ..... divert the income before it accrues or arises to him. effectiveness of the device depends not upon considerations of morality, but on the operation of the income-tax act. legislative injunction in taxing statues may not, except on peril of penalty, be violated, but it may lawfully be circumvented. 13. if the goods were nominally .....

Prima Paint Corp. Vs. Flood and ConklIn Mfg. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... agreement were enforceable in federal court but not in the state court, id. at 350 u. s. 204 , posed a choice of two alternatives for judge medina. if he held that the arbitration act rested solely on congress' power, widely recognized in 1925 but negated in erie, to prescribe general federal law applicable in diversity cases, he would be compelled ..... not encroach upon the province of the individual states." cohen & dayton, the new federal arbitration law, 12 va.l.rev. 265, 276-277. all this indicates that the 4 inquiry of whether the making of the arbitration agreement is in issue is to be determined by reference to state law, not federal law formulated by ..... u.s.c. 152(7). in other instances, congress has chosen more restrictive language. fair labor standards act of 1938, 52 stat. 1062, 6, as amended, 29 u.s.c. 206. prior to this case, this court has always made careful inquiry to assure itself that it is applying a statute with the coverage that congress intended, so that the meaning .....

Berger Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

..... responsibility on this court in its supervision of the fairness of procedures. . . ." at 385 u. s. 329 , n. 7. there, two judges acting jointly authorized the installation of a device on the person of a prospective witness to record conversations between him and an attorney for a defendant then on trial ..... electronic surveillance. the other members of the commission have serious doubts about the desirability of such authority, and believe that, without the kind of searching inquiry that would result from further congressional consideration of electronic surveillance, particularly of the problems of bugging, there is insufficient basis to strike this balance against ..... recording, although an invasion of the privacy protected by the page 388 u. s. 57 fourth amendment, was admissible because of the authorization of the judges, based upon "a detailed factual affidavit alleging the commission of a specific criminal offense directly and immediately affecting the administration of justice . . . for .....

United States Vs. Sealy, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... u. s. 127 , 384 u. s. 147 -148 (1966). [ footnote 5 ] within settled doctrine, they are unlawful under 1 of the sherman act without the necessity for an inquiry page 388 u. s. 358 in each particular case as to their business or economic justification, their impact in the marketplace, or their reasonableness. accordingly, ..... practice in the context of the facts found by the trial court. the district court, however, made no findings in respect to this theory for judging liability, since the government insisted on trying the case in per se terms, attempting to prove only a horizontal conspiracy. although sealy did introduce some ..... complaint alleges price-fixing and market allocations by serta, which it has denied. defendant alleges the agreements made were reasonable ancillary restraints, valid under the sherman act, and the evidence sought by this subpoena would completely corroborate the reasonableness. the plaintiff, the government, has also filed a brief supportive of the motion to .....

Nlrb Vs. Allis-chalmers Mfg. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... security provision in the contract under which a substantial minority of the employees may have been forced into membership." 358 f.2d at 660. but the relevant inquiry here is not what motivated a member's full membership, but whether the taft-hartley amendments prohibited disciplinary measures against a full member who crossed his union' ..... the court of appeals for the seventh circuit, a panel of that court upheld the board's decision. following a rehearing en banc, however, the court, three judges dissenting, withdrew the panel opinion, held that the locals' conduct violated 8(b)(1)(a), and remanded to the board for appropriate proceedings. 358 f.2d 656 ..... [ footnote 30 ] however, page 388 u. s. 193 even were there evidence that congress shared this concern, [ footnote 31 ]this would not justify reading the act also to bar court enforcement of reasonable fines. [ footnote 32 ] the 1959 landrum-griffin amendments, thought to be the first comprehensive regulation by congress of the conduct of .....

United States Vs. Arnold, Schwinn and Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in order to make a judgment as to whether the restraint is or is not "reasonable" in the special sense in which 1 of the sherman act must be read for purposes of this type of inquiry. chicago board of trade v. united states, 246 u. s. 231 , 246 u. s. 238 (1918); standard oil co. v. ..... it was indeed "good business practice," we should not quarrel with schwinn's eloquent submission or the finding of the trial court. but our inquiry cannot stop at that point. our inquiry is whether, assuming nonpredatory motives and business purposes and the incentive of profit and volume considerations, the effect upon competition in the marketplace is ..... there is often serious question whether the latter conduct involves the "contract, combination . . . or conspiracy" required by 1 of the sherman act, 26 stat. 209, as amended, 15 u.s.c. 1. the district judge in this case refused to find that the relevant conduct of schwinn and its distributors amounted to a "contract," "combination" or "conspiracy." .....

Curtis Pub. Co. Vs. Butts

Court : US Supreme Court

..... true are detailed at length in the opinion of mr. justice harlan. suffice it to say that little investigative effort was expended initially, and no additional inquiries were made even after the editors were notified by respondent and his daughter that the account page 388 u. s. 170 to be published was absolutely ..... the punitive damage award, the majority upheld it as stemming from the "enlightened conscience" of the jury as adjusted by the lawful action of the trial judge. it was in "complete accord" with the trial court's determination that the evidence justified the finding "that what the post did was done with reckless ..... justice fortas). [ footnote 2/4 ] ga.code ann. 105-709(6) provides: "privileged communications. -- the following are deemed privileged communications: " " * * * *" "6. comments upon the acts of public men in their public capacity and with reference thereto." this privilege is qualified by ga.code ann. 105-710, which provides: "malicious use of privilege. -- in every case .....