Array ( [0] => ..... ). in support of this argument reliance is placed on the division bench ruling in p. satyanarayana v. the state of andhra pradesh, air 1959 andh pra 429 and the single judge ruling in thomas v. state transport authority, 1960 ker lt 108: air 1960 kerala 111. 4. the condition that can be attached to a permit under clause (iv) of ..... regionaltransport authority. the delegation made to the secretary under rule 144 of the travancore-cochin motor vehicles rules framed in 1952 at a time when, under the provisions of the act as it then stood, this power of regulating timings was governed by section 48 (c)and the time table was not a condition of the permit, cannot operate with regard ..... no jurisdiction to alter the approved time table since, under the provisions of clauses (iii) and (iv) of sub-section (3) of section 48 of the motor vehicles act as amended by act c of 1956, the time table is one of the conditions of the permit which under clauses 20 and 21 of the same sub-section, can be varied only ..... [1] => ..... as a result of the stab injury sustained by him.4. the next question is whether the injury was inflicted by the accused. the learned judge has in para 5 of the judgment stated that the act of stabbing is not disputed by the accused. as stated earlier, the accused has not admitted that he stabbed and inflicted the injury. we ..... of going about with the penknife or that he had come armed with a penknife on that day to take revenge on raveendran as the learned sessions judge seems to think. the learned judge has observed in para 5 of his judgment that:'he first threw the stick at raveendran. the fact that he had run a little distance from the ..... evidence in the case and the circumstances and probabilities, we are not prepared to agree with the learned sessions judge that the attack by the accused was either 'intentional or retaliatory in nature.' it cannot, therefore, be said that the act of the accused amounts to an offence and we find that he is completely protected by the right of private ..... [2] => ..... that tribunal itself or he satisfies the court that he was unaware of the circumstances which will put him on an inquiry as to the lack of jurisdiction of the subordinate tribunal.'the learned judge on the facts of that case found that there was no total lack of jurisdiction and that it was only a case ..... he bases his objection. that rule is established on good grounds. it applies equally whether the objection is on grounds which make the act of the justices voidable or void.' the learned judge also observed :'in my view the writ is discretionary. a party may by his conduct preclude himself from claiming the writ ex debito justitiae ..... 226 of the constitution and related to the constitution, of the appellate authority to hear appeals against the orders of a regional transport authority under the motor vehicles act.there were certain defects in the constitution of the tribunal. but no objections to such constitution were taken before the tribunal itself. when the question of jurisdiction ..... [3] => ..... what after all is the purpose of holding an enquiry? in venkataraman v. union of india, air 1954 sc 375, speaking with reference to the public servants (inquiries) act, xxxvii of 1850, which in a sense may be deemed to be in pan materia with rules for taking disciplinary action, the supreme court considered the only purpose ..... reasonable opportunity that is posited, is of the civil servant to establish his innocence concerning the accusations on which he is sought to be punished, and must be judged with reference to himself and not others. this is not to ignore the responsibility of the punishing authority, for, it is far too elementary to state, that ..... the kerala rules, to be held on the complaint for 'indecent behaviour and misconduct' on his part, and committed the enquiry to the enquiry commissioner and special judge who may he referred to hereafter as the commissioner. upon the complaint, the commissioner framed a charge against the petitioner, the substance of which was, that after ..... [4] => ..... contend, that article 14 hits even a notification by government; but the notification which was attacked, had the force of law having been issued under s, 3 of the commissionsof inquiry act, 1952. i therefore hold, that the argument based on article 14 cannot prevail. 7. lastly, the point was raised, that respondents 1 and 2 had no jurisdiction to pass the ..... and instructions. a similar view was taken of the travancore education code in t. m. dasius v. state, 1956 ker lt 238 : (air 1957 trav-co. 214) where the learned judge observed as follows : 'it is not a legislative enactment nor has it the force of a statute and it does not confer any right on private school teachers. orders of ..... ) Judges Inquiry Act 1968 Section 5 Powers of Committee - Sortby Recent - Court Kerala - Year 1960 - Page 4 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Court: kerala Year: 1960 Page 4 of about 35 results (0.109 seconds)

Feb 15 1960 (HC)

Ninan Vs. Secretary, State Transport Authority, Trivandrum and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-15-1960

Reported in : AIR1960Ker359

..... ). in support of this argument reliance is placed on the division bench ruling in p. satyanarayana v. the state of andhra pradesh, air 1959 andh pra 429 and the single judge ruling in thomas v. state transport authority, 1960 ker lt 108: air 1960 kerala 111. 4. the condition that can be attached to a permit under clause (iv) of ..... regionaltransport authority. the delegation made to the secretary under rule 144 of the travancore-cochin motor vehicles rules framed in 1952 at a time when, under the provisions of the act as it then stood, this power of regulating timings was governed by section 48 (c)and the time table was not a condition of the permit, cannot operate with regard ..... no jurisdiction to alter the approved time table since, under the provisions of clauses (iii) and (iv) of sub-section (3) of section 48 of the motor vehicles act as amended by act c of 1956, the time table is one of the conditions of the permit which under clauses 20 and 21 of the same sub-section, can be varied only .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 11 1960 (HC)

Govindan Neelambaran Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-11-1960

Reported in : AIR1960Ker258; 1960CriLJ1088

..... as a result of the stab injury sustained by him.4. the next question is whether the injury was inflicted by the accused. the learned judge has in para 5 of the judgment stated that the act of stabbing is not disputed by the accused. as stated earlier, the accused has not admitted that he stabbed and inflicted the injury. we ..... of going about with the penknife or that he had come armed with a penknife on that day to take revenge on raveendran as the learned sessions judge seems to think. the learned judge has observed in para 5 of his judgment that:'he first threw the stick at raveendran. the fact that he had run a little distance from the ..... evidence in the case and the circumstances and probabilities, we are not prepared to agree with the learned sessions judge that the attack by the accused was either 'intentional or retaliatory in nature.' it cannot, therefore, be said that the act of the accused amounts to an offence and we find that he is completely protected by the right of private .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 02 1960 (HC)

S. Kumaraswamy Reddiar Vs. S. Noordeen and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-02-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Ker117

..... that tribunal itself or he satisfies the court that he was unaware of the circumstances which will put him on an inquiry as to the lack of jurisdiction of the subordinate tribunal.'the learned judge on the facts of that case found that there was no total lack of jurisdiction and that it was only a case ..... he bases his objection. that rule is established on good grounds. it applies equally whether the objection is on grounds which make the act of the justices voidable or void.' the learned judge also observed :'in my view the writ is discretionary. a party may by his conduct preclude himself from claiming the writ ex debito justitiae ..... 226 of the constitution and related to the constitution, of the appellate authority to hear appeals against the orders of a regional transport authority under the motor vehicles act.there were certain defects in the constitution of the tribunal. but no objections to such constitution were taken before the tribunal itself. when the question of jurisdiction .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jan 12 1960 (HC)

S. Neelakanta Iyer Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-12-1960

Reported in : AIR1960Ker279; (1960)IILLJ398Ker; (1960)IILLJ398Ker

..... what after all is the purpose of holding an enquiry? in venkataraman v. union of india, air 1954 sc 375, speaking with reference to the public servants (inquiries) act, xxxvii of 1850, which in a sense may be deemed to be in pan materia with rules for taking disciplinary action, the supreme court considered the only purpose ..... reasonable opportunity that is posited, is of the civil servant to establish his innocence concerning the accusations on which he is sought to be punished, and must be judged with reference to himself and not others. this is not to ignore the responsibility of the punishing authority, for, it is far too elementary to state, that ..... the kerala rules, to be held on the complaint for 'indecent behaviour and misconduct' on his part, and committed the enquiry to the enquiry commissioner and special judge who may he referred to hereafter as the commissioner. upon the complaint, the commissioner framed a charge against the petitioner, the substance of which was, that after .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jan 05 1960 (HC)

K.R. Sadasiva Iyer Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-1960

Reported in : AIR1960Ker327

..... contend, that article 14 hits even a notification by government; but the notification which was attacked, had the force of law having been issued under s, 3 of the commissionsof inquiry act, 1952. i therefore hold, that the argument based on article 14 cannot prevail. 7. lastly, the point was raised, that respondents 1 and 2 had no jurisdiction to pass the ..... and instructions. a similar view was taken of the travancore education code in t. m. dasius v. state, 1956 ker lt 238 : (air 1957 trav-co. 214) where the learned judge observed as follows : 'it is not a legislative enactment nor has it the force of a statute and it does not confer any right on private school teachers. orders of .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //