Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... revision petitioner are causing or calculated to cause alarm, danger or harm to person or property by reproducing section 55(a) of the act, itself cannot be said as sufficient evidence to have subjective satisfaction of respondent no.5 regarding the apprehension without making any enquiry. therefore, ..... impugned order under revision passed by respondent no.5 for non-compliance of mandatory requirement in terms of sections 55 and 58 of the act and without conducting any enquiry cannot be legally sustained. consequently, proceed to pass the following: order revision petition filed by revision petitioner is ..... furnish the security bond as required or fails to appear before the officer or authority during the inquiry, it shall be lawful to the officer or authority to proceed with the inquiry and thereupon such order as - 8 - crl.rp no.100084 of 2023 was proposed to be ..... aside. pending ia-1/2023 does not survive for consideration. accordingly, it is disposed of. (sd/-) judge jm/ list no.:1. sl no.:2. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... officer, ftc & mact, mysuru and the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru, are hereby modified holding that the owner of the offending vehicles i.e., tata sumo and motorcycle respectively are liable to pay compensation to the claimants ..... is filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for brevity) fastening the liability on the insurance company to pay the compensation. mfa no.5338/2010 is filed ..... chikmagalur taluk respondents (by sri. n r ravikumar .,advocate for r2; r1 served) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated239.2011 passed in mvc no.91/2008 on the file of principal district judge & mmact, chikmagalur, awarding a compensation of rs.34,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... officer, ftc & mact, mysuru and the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru, are hereby modified holding that the owner of the offending vehicles i.e., tata sumo and motorcycle respectively are liable to pay compensation to the claimants ..... is filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for brevity) fastening the liability on the insurance company to pay the compensation. mfa no.5338/2010 is filed ..... chikmagalur taluk respondents (by sri. n r ravikumar .,advocate for r2; r1 served) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated239.2011 passed in mvc no.91/2008 on the file of principal district judge & mmact, chikmagalur, awarding a compensation of rs.34,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... officer, ftc & mact, mysuru and the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru, are hereby modified holding that the owner of the offending vehicles i.e., tata sumo and motorcycle respectively are liable to pay compensation to the claimants ..... is filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for brevity) fastening the liability on the insurance company to pay the compensation. mfa no.5338/2010 is filed ..... chikmagalur taluk respondents (by sri. n r ravikumar .,advocate for r2; r1 served) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated239.2011 passed in mvc no.91/2008 on the file of principal district judge & mmact, chikmagalur, awarding a compensation of rs.34,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... officer, ftc & mact, mysuru and the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru, are hereby modified holding that the owner of the offending vehicles i.e., tata sumo and motorcycle respectively are liable to pay compensation to the claimants ..... is filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for brevity) fastening the liability on the insurance company to pay the compensation. mfa no.5338/2010 is filed ..... chikmagalur taluk respondents (by sri. n r ravikumar .,advocate for r2; r1 served) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated239.2011 passed in mvc no.91/2008 on the file of principal district judge & mmact, chikmagalur, awarding a compensation of rs.34,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... officer, ftc & mact, mysuru and the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru, are hereby modified holding that the owner of the offending vehicles i.e., tata sumo and motorcycle respectively are liable to pay compensation to the claimants ..... is filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for brevity) fastening the liability on the insurance company to pay the compensation. mfa no.5338/2010 is filed ..... chikmagalur taluk respondents (by sri. n r ravikumar .,advocate for r2; r1 served) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated239.2011 passed in mvc no.91/2008 on the file of principal district judge & mmact, chikmagalur, awarding a compensation of rs.34,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-02-2023
..... scc1:2022. scc online sc929 , this court observed that the length of punishment is not only the indicator of the gravity of offence and it is to be judged by a totality of factors, especially keeping in mind the background in which the offence came to be recognised by the legislature in the specific international context. in this ..... the apex court has time and again considered this aspect i.e., importance of reporting of offences, particularly by doctors and the seriousness attached to such reporting. a three judge bench of the apex court in the case of x .. v. principal secretary, health and family welfare department1 has held as follows: 82. furthermore, section 19(1 ..... or otherwise of an offence of failure to discharge the legal obligation under section 19, punishable under section 21 of the pocso act. 22 we are fortified in our view, by the decisions of a three-judge bench of this court in vijay madanlal choudhary v. union of india [vijay madanlal choudhary v. union of india, (2023) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-02-2023
..... request you to take appropriate action and help and protect me from the harassment of mr. srinivas and his henchmen. (emphasis added) the police after preliminary inquiry register a non- cognizable report. taking the threat further, a legal notice is caused by the complainant upon the 1st and 3rd petitioners in which the claim ..... and fabricated documents were only against accused 1, ought to have exercised his jurisdiction to quash the proceedings qua accused 4 also. we find that the learned judge ought to have applied the same parameters to the present accused 4, which had 23 been applied to the other accused whose applications were allowed. (emphasis ..... or interpretation of this deed or any other matter relating to the partnership affairs, shall be referred to arbitration under the provisions of the arbitration and conciliation act, by appointing a sole arbitrator.16) jurisdiction: every matter arising out of this deed and all transactions covered by it are subject to the jurisdiction of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-02-2023
..... under the contract to be recovered from the running bills. it was further observed that disclosure of such facts would have put the bank to further inquiry as to what was the amount covered by those bills and what was the corresponding amount of the mobilisation advance and to what extent the amount ..... constitutes an independent contract. in hindustan construction co. ltd. v. state of bihar [hindustan construction co. ltd. v. state of bihar, (1999) 8 scc436 , a two-judge bench of this court formulated the condition upon which the invocation of the bank guarantee depends in the following terms : (scc p. 442, para9) 9. what is important, ..... between: pg setty construction technology pvt. ltd., represented by its md m.g.somashekar having its registered office at #74, sandesh arcade, 3rd floor registered under companies act, 1986 sahukar chennaiah road17h main, kuvempunagar north saraswathipuram mysore 09 reg. no.2558411999 ... petitioner (by sri jayakumar s. patil, senior advocate a/w., sri v.v .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-02-2023
..... aforesaid, who would meet out harassment or torture to the wife to satisfy their unlawful demands of dowry.11. if the aforesaid hyper-technical contention is accepted, it would act against the interests of women and the object for which the provision was added. the enactment of the legislature with the aforesaid purpose cannot be rendered illusory by a declaration ..... divorce notice from the husband, defeats the very object of section 498a of the ipc, or even complaints made under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. the purpose in introducing chapter xx-a bringing in section 498a in the indian penal code was with the objective to prevent torture to a women by her ..... respondent no.1 police in cr.no.61/2022 pending on the file of the honble viii addl.civil judge and j.m.f.c mysuru for the offence p/u/s498, 307, 506 of ipc and sec.3, 4 of d.p act. this criminal petition having been heard and reserved for orders on3005.2023, coming on for pronouncement this day .....
Tag this Judgment!