Array ( [0] => ..... in its own good time the question relating to the forum of trial as well as of appeal under the indian divorce act is an urgent matter. there is no need to waste the time of the judges of the high court over matters which relate to the christian community which are no more important than similar matters relating to ..... appeal in civil cases apply. it is unnecessary and wholly incongruous that the causes under the indian divorce act, should be heard by a high court judge, in the city and decrees passed by district judges should be confirmed by a bench of three judges of the high court. it is necessary and it would be advisable, to bring the provisions of ..... the indian divorce act, in regard to divorce and judicial separation, in line with the provisions of the other three acts already mentioned. while that is a ..... [1] => ..... has once begun to run will as a rule continue to do so. no subsequent disability or inability to sue stops it--see section 9 of the limitation act, 1908. the learned judge at the trial, when he observed that the subrogee is not affected by any rule of limitation which applies to the other person, overlooks the position of ..... of six months for action against any person for anything done or purported to have been done in pursuance of the act from the accrual of the cause of the suit.13. on the question of negligence, the learned judge, after a close analysis of the evidence and having regard to the law governing the matter, held that the board ..... applied and not the special period of limitation provided under section 110 of the act. the learned judge, on an examination of the relevant provisions of the act and the authorities placed before him, rejected the insurer's contention that section 110 of the act would not apply to the case. he held that the period of limitation provided in section ..... [2] => ..... which has once begun to run will as a rule continue to do so. no subsequent disability or inability to sue stops these section 9 of the limitation act, 1908. the learned judge at the trial, when he observed that the subrogee is not affected by any rule of limitation which applies to the other person, overlooks the position of ..... of six months for action against any person for anything done or purported to have been done in pursuance of the act from the accrual of the cause of the suit.13. on the question of negligence, the learned judge, after a close analysis of the evidence and having regard to the law governing the matter, held that the board ..... applied and not the special period of limitation provided under section 110 of the act. the learned judge, on an examination of the relevant provisions of the act and the authorities placed before him, rejected the insurer's contention that section no of the act would not apply to the case. he held that the period of limitation provided in section ..... [3] => ..... 2) on a consideration of the evidence, i think the letter exhibit p-1 was taken under coercion and undue influence....after making such irreconcilable observations, the learned judge dismissed the suit.8. it is not clear from the judgment of the trial court as to what is the clinching finding of fact which prompted him to ..... v. ghouse mohideen marakayar : (1917)32mlj213 , held as follows:a full bench of the small cause court sitting under section 38 of the presidency small cause courts act has no jurisdiction to decide questions of fact generally; nor has it jurisdiction to decide questions of fact, when those questions of fact first arise before it in consequence ..... but this general rule has some exceptions when considered in the light of the jurisdiction conferred upon them by status . under section 37 of the presidency small cause courts act, 1882, it is provided.save as otherwise provided by this chapter (chapter vi) or by any other enactment for the time being in force, every decree and ..... [4] => ..... meaning of sec. 146, i.p.c.(9) they were also armed with weapons like knife, hammer, crowbar and spades. they are undoubtedly deadly weapons. the learned sessions judge was under a misapprehension that unless the weapons are carried for the purpose of using them as weapons of offence, they cannot be called deadly weapons. the test is not ..... which satisfies the third clause of s. 141, i.p.c. the conviction of the accused under s. 430, i.p.c. (mischief) has been confirmed by the sessions judge. therefore, there cannot be any doubt that the accused were the members of the unlawful assembly. 'rioting' is defined under s. 146, i.p.c. section 146, i.p ..... c. hence, the complainant preferred the appeal against the acquittal under sec. 148, i.p.c. and the accused filed the revision petition against the order of the sessions judge confirming their conviction and sentence under s. 430, i.p.c.(3) so far as the revision petition is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to challenge ..... [5] => ..... to apply the principles which the decision of this court has laid down, in state of madras v. estates abolition tribunal : (1958)2mlj585 , the learned judges have observed that in respect of lands near a tank-bed that are liable to submersion when the tank is at full level the initial presumption, which is ..... reached that the lands in question were tank-bed lands, and that therefore no patta could be granted to the petitioner under section 11 of the abolition act. mr. vedanthachari learned counsel for the petitioner urges strenuously that while discussing the evidence, the settlement authorities have not kept in view the relevant principles laid ..... the petitioner applied to the additional assistant settlement officer for grant of ryotwari patta to him in respect of the said lands under section 11 of the abolition act. the additional assistant sattlement officer dismissed the application on 3rd march, 1958. the appeal before the settlement officer was dismissed on 13th june, 1958, and a ..... [6] => ..... has been convicted under section 16(1)(b) of the prevention of food adulteration act and sentenced to pay a fine of rs. 100, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two months by the district magistrate, tiruchirapalli. on appeal, the sessions judge, tiruchirapalli confirmed the conviction and sentence. the following facts are not disputed before me ..... 3. it is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the conviction under section 16 (1) (b) of the prevention of food adulteration act cannot be sustained for the reason that there was nothing to show from the evidence of the food inspector that he either demanded sample from the petitioner or ..... generally, since a food inspector has got several powers to exercise. though the power of taking sample is also one of the powers conferred on him under the act, it is specially carved out from the other powers and specifically brought in clause (b) of section 16 (1). it is, therefore, necessary for the prosecution ..... [7] => ..... the appeal from the jail was committed under section 304 (part i), indian penal code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years by the additional sessions judge, coimbatore.2. the charge against the appellant is that he committed an offence punishable under section 302, indian penal code, for having caused the death of his ..... in their hut. the question is as to how far and to what extent the extra-judicial confession and the judicial confession made by the appellant can be acted upon. it is necessary that the prosecution should establish the offence by independent evidence. if once the offence is established, the confession can be taken into consideration ..... and short and devoid of details. he had not even stated the details of the quarrel and what really transpired between himself and the deceased and even the act of throttling he had not described. if the appellant had come with a voluntary statement without any mental reservation, he would have described fully as to how ..... [8] => ..... is no express provision of law requiring it to be in writing, the general principle referred to above will enable it to be validly made without writing." the learned judge, if we may say so with respect, rightly pointed out that section 9 underlines the general principle that everything is to be taken permissible unless there is a prohibition ..... evidence regarding the truth or falsehood of it. neither of them can neglect his duty and afterwards claim to show that the allegation of his opponent was false."the learned judge noticed the classical observations of lord justice james in flower v. llyod, 1879-10 ch d 327 at p. 333 which are well worth reproduction:--"assuming all the ..... aside the judgment and decree in o. s. 3 of 1958, both on the file of the same subordinate judge. the appellant in a. s, 28 of 1962 is a limited liability company incorporated under the provisions of the indian companies act, on 12-7-48, with its registered office at raja-palayam. two of its promoters, one of them ..... [9] => orderk. veeraswami, j.1. this petition is directed against an order of the city civil judge taking the view that the entire claim is triable only by the claims tribunal under the motor vehicles act and that, as such, the civil court has no jurisdiction. on that view, it returned the petition for leave to sue in forma pauperis to ..... personal injuries to the petitioner is concerned, the court below was clearly right in the view it took. sections no (1) and 110-f of the motor vehicles act make it crystal clear that claims for compensation in respect of accidents involving bodily injury are triable only by the claims tribunal having territorial jurisdiction and that the civil ..... civil court is excluded by terms of section 110-f. there is absolutely no indication in either of the sections or in any other provisions of the motor vehicles act to justify the proposition that the tribunal will have jurisdiction to try any claim other than that defined in section 110 (1). it may be that this approach ..... ) Judges Inquiry Act 1968 Section 5 Powers of Committee - Sortby Recent - Court Chennai - Year 1967 - Page 4 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Year: 1967 Page 4 of about 107 results (0.264 seconds)

Sep 21 1967 (HC)

Solomon Devasahayam Selvaraj Vs. Chandriah Mary

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-21-1967

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ289

..... in its own good time the question relating to the forum of trial as well as of appeal under the indian divorce act is an urgent matter. there is no need to waste the time of the judges of the high court over matters which relate to the christian community which are no more important than similar matters relating to ..... appeal in civil cases apply. it is unnecessary and wholly incongruous that the causes under the indian divorce act, should be heard by a high court judge, in the city and decrees passed by district judges should be confirmed by a bench of three judges of the high court. it is necessary and it would be advisable, to bring the provisions of ..... the indian divorce act, in regard to divorce and judicial separation, in line with the provisions of the other three acts already mentioned. while that is a .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 20 1967 (HC)

Trustees of the Port of Madras Vs. Home Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-20-1967

Reported in : AIR1970Mad48

..... has once begun to run will as a rule continue to do so. no subsequent disability or inability to sue stops it--see section 9 of the limitation act, 1908. the learned judge at the trial, when he observed that the subrogee is not affected by any rule of limitation which applies to the other person, overlooks the position of ..... of six months for action against any person for anything done or purported to have been done in pursuance of the act from the accrual of the cause of the suit.13. on the question of negligence, the learned judge, after a close analysis of the evidence and having regard to the law governing the matter, held that the board ..... applied and not the special period of limitation provided under section 110 of the act. the learned judge, on an examination of the relevant provisions of the act and the authorities placed before him, rejected the insurer's contention that section 110 of the act would not apply to the case. he held that the period of limitation provided in section .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 20 1967 (HC)

The Trustees of the Port of Madras, Represented by the Chairman, Madra ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-20-1967

Reported in : (1968)2MLJ497

..... which has once begun to run will as a rule continue to do so. no subsequent disability or inability to sue stops these section 9 of the limitation act, 1908. the learned judge at the trial, when he observed that the subrogee is not affected by any rule of limitation which applies to the other person, overlooks the position of ..... of six months for action against any person for anything done or purported to have been done in pursuance of the act from the accrual of the cause of the suit.13. on the question of negligence, the learned judge, after a close analysis of the evidence and having regard to the law governing the matter, held that the board ..... applied and not the special period of limitation provided under section 110 of the act. the learned judge, on an examination of the relevant provisions of the act and the authorities placed before him, rejected the insurer's contention that section no of the act would not apply to the case. he held that the period of limitation provided in section .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 19 1967 (HC)

Madras Cine Service by Sole Proprietor T.S. Lakshmi Vs. Shyamala Pictu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-19-1967

Reported in : (1968)2MLJ205

..... 2) on a consideration of the evidence, i think the letter exhibit p-1 was taken under coercion and undue influence....after making such irreconcilable observations, the learned judge dismissed the suit.8. it is not clear from the judgment of the trial court as to what is the clinching finding of fact which prompted him to ..... v. ghouse mohideen marakayar : (1917)32mlj213 , held as follows:a full bench of the small cause court sitting under section 38 of the presidency small cause courts act has no jurisdiction to decide questions of fact generally; nor has it jurisdiction to decide questions of fact, when those questions of fact first arise before it in consequence ..... but this general rule has some exceptions when considered in the light of the jurisdiction conferred upon them by status . under section 37 of the presidency small cause courts act, 1882, it is provided.save as otherwise provided by this chapter (chapter vi) or by any other enactment for the time being in force, every decree and .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 18 1967 (HC)

Lakshmiammal Vs. Samiappa Goundar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-18-1967

Reported in : AIR1968Mad310; (1968)1MLJ226

..... meaning of sec. 146, i.p.c.(9) they were also armed with weapons like knife, hammer, crowbar and spades. they are undoubtedly deadly weapons. the learned sessions judge was under a misapprehension that unless the weapons are carried for the purpose of using them as weapons of offence, they cannot be called deadly weapons. the test is not ..... which satisfies the third clause of s. 141, i.p.c. the conviction of the accused under s. 430, i.p.c. (mischief) has been confirmed by the sessions judge. therefore, there cannot be any doubt that the accused were the members of the unlawful assembly. 'rioting' is defined under s. 146, i.p.c. section 146, i.p ..... c. hence, the complainant preferred the appeal against the acquittal under sec. 148, i.p.c. and the accused filed the revision petition against the order of the sessions judge confirming their conviction and sentence under s. 430, i.p.c.(3) so far as the revision petition is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to challenge .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 13 1967 (HC)

Ramaswami Goundar Vs. the Board of Revenue, Madras by the Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-13-1967

Reported in : (1968)2MLJ124

..... to apply the principles which the decision of this court has laid down, in state of madras v. estates abolition tribunal : (1958)2mlj585 , the learned judges have observed that in respect of lands near a tank-bed that are liable to submersion when the tank is at full level the initial presumption, which is ..... reached that the lands in question were tank-bed lands, and that therefore no patta could be granted to the petitioner under section 11 of the abolition act. mr. vedanthachari learned counsel for the petitioner urges strenuously that while discussing the evidence, the settlement authorities have not kept in view the relevant principles laid ..... the petitioner applied to the additional assistant settlement officer for grant of ryotwari patta to him in respect of the said lands under section 11 of the abolition act. the additional assistant sattlement officer dismissed the application on 3rd march, 1958. the appeal before the settlement officer was dismissed on 13th june, 1958, and a .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 09 1967 (HC)

In Re: Valaguru Asari

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-09-1967

Reported in : (1968)2MLJ307

..... has been convicted under section 16(1)(b) of the prevention of food adulteration act and sentenced to pay a fine of rs. 100, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two months by the district magistrate, tiruchirapalli. on appeal, the sessions judge, tiruchirapalli confirmed the conviction and sentence. the following facts are not disputed before me ..... 3. it is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the conviction under section 16 (1) (b) of the prevention of food adulteration act cannot be sustained for the reason that there was nothing to show from the evidence of the food inspector that he either demanded sample from the petitioner or ..... generally, since a food inspector has got several powers to exercise. though the power of taking sample is also one of the powers conferred on him under the act, it is specially carved out from the other powers and specifically brought in clause (b) of section 16 (1). it is, therefore, necessary for the prosecution .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 08 1967 (HC)

In Re: Kandaswamy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-08-1967

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ372

..... the appeal from the jail was committed under section 304 (part i), indian penal code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years by the additional sessions judge, coimbatore.2. the charge against the appellant is that he committed an offence punishable under section 302, indian penal code, for having caused the death of his ..... in their hut. the question is as to how far and to what extent the extra-judicial confession and the judicial confession made by the appellant can be acted upon. it is necessary that the prosecution should establish the offence by independent evidence. if once the offence is established, the confession can be taken into consideration ..... and short and devoid of details. he had not even stated the details of the quarrel and what really transpired between himself and the deceased and even the act of throttling he had not described. if the appellant had come with a voluntary statement without any mental reservation, he would have described fully as to how .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 01 1967 (HC)

The Weavers Mills Ltd., Rajapalayam Vs. Balkis Ammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-01-1967

Reported in : AIR1969Mad462; (1969)2MLJ509

..... is no express provision of law requiring it to be in writing, the general principle referred to above will enable it to be validly made without writing." the learned judge, if we may say so with respect, rightly pointed out that section 9 underlines the general principle that everything is to be taken permissible unless there is a prohibition ..... evidence regarding the truth or falsehood of it. neither of them can neglect his duty and afterwards claim to show that the allegation of his opponent was false."the learned judge noticed the classical observations of lord justice james in flower v. llyod, 1879-10 ch d 327 at p. 333 which are well worth reproduction:--"assuming all the ..... aside the judgment and decree in o. s. 3 of 1958, both on the file of the same subordinate judge. the appellant in a. s, 28 of 1962 is a limited liability company incorporated under the provisions of the indian companies act, on 12-7-48, with its registered office at raja-palayam. two of its promoters, one of them .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 01 1967 (HC)

R. Selvaraj Vs. Jagannathan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-01-1967

Reported in : (1969)2MLJ417

orderk. veeraswami, j.1. this petition is directed against an order of the city civil judge taking the view that the entire claim is triable only by the claims tribunal under the motor vehicles act and that, as such, the civil court has no jurisdiction. on that view, it returned the petition for leave to sue in forma pauperis to ..... personal injuries to the petitioner is concerned, the court below was clearly right in the view it took. sections no (1) and 110-f of the motor vehicles act make it crystal clear that claims for compensation in respect of accidents involving bodily injury are triable only by the claims tribunal having territorial jurisdiction and that the civil ..... civil court is excluded by terms of section 110-f. there is absolutely no indication in either of the sections or in any other provisions of the motor vehicles act to justify the proposition that the tribunal will have jurisdiction to try any claim other than that defined in section 110 (1). it may be that this approach .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //