Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-12-1960
Reported in : AIR1960AP479
..... by the supreme court in parshotam lal dhingra v. union of india, : (1958)illj544sc . after referring to the exceptions occurring in the constitution, the learned judges have clarified the position thus in para 9 of the reported judgment; (relevant portion is extracted).'subject to these exceptions our constitution, by article 310(1), has ..... or rajpramukh, as the casemay be, is only a reiteration of corresponding provisions which occurred in the government of indiaact, 1935. the relevant provision of that act, repealed by the indian constitution, was section240 which specified the tenure of office as duringhis majesty's pleasure.25. our view is consistent with what has ..... working within the framework of the constitution have necessarily to deal with the petitioner according to the constitution under which it derived its power and not apply act no. iii of 1314 fasli, for enquiring into the corrupt practices of government officials, which ceased to operate.18a. we are, therefore, unable to find .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-11-1960
Reported in : (1961)ILLJ150AP
..... 17(b) of the madras civil services (classification, control and appeal)rules runs as follows17. (b)(i) without prejudice to the provisions of the public servants inquiries act, 1850 (central act xxxvii of 1850), in every case where it is proposed to impose on a member of a service any of the penalties specified in items (vi), (vii) ..... been properly and regularly held and completed.30. another point urged on behalf of the petitioner was that the respondent 2 was guided by extraneous considerations in judging his (petitioner's) guilt on the present charges by taking into account the fact that the increment of the petitioner had been stopped for two months previously ..... (hereinafter referred to for the sake of convenience as 'm.c.s.c.c. rules') and that the respondent 2 wag guided by extraneous considerations in judging the guilt of the present petitioner on the present charges by taking into account the fact that increment had been stopped for two months by the district prohibition officer .....
Tag this Judgment!