Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-2023
..... w.p. no.4377/2023 30 31. manjula h. pammar d/o hanumantappa r. pammar aged about33years kahnniya residency, no.220 near commissioner of police office judge s quarters road, amarghol near navanagar hubli-580 025.32. sachin biradar s/o bapugouda biradar aged about26years a/p: korwar, tq: devarhipparagi dist: vijayapura-586 ..... appointments of untainted candidates of gazetted probationers of 2011 batch by promulgating karnataka civil services (validation of selection and appointment of 2011 batch, gazetted probationers) act, 2022. the case on hand is similar to that of gazetted probationers of 2011. hence, the untainted candidates in this case need to be protected ..... in favour of the applicants. we may record that in a.a. claton, involving the selection of teachers under section 16-e of the up intermediate education act, 1921, there was no written examination or allegation of irregularities concerning examination. iv. sachin kumar vs. delhi subordinate service selection board (dsssb) & ors10; in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-2023
..... w.p. no.4377/2023 30 31. manjula h. pammar d/o hanumantappa r. pammar aged about33years kahnniya residency, no.220 near commissioner of police office judge s quarters road, amarghol near navanagar hubli-580 025.32. sachin biradar s/o bapugouda biradar aged about26years a/p: korwar, tq: devarhipparagi dist: vijayapura-586 ..... appointments of untainted candidates of gazetted probationers of 2011 batch by promulgating karnataka civil services (validation of selection and appointment of 2011 batch, gazetted probationers) act, 2022. the case on hand is similar to that of gazetted probationers of 2011. hence, the untainted candidates in this case need to be protected ..... in favour of the applicants. we may record that in a.a. claton, involving the selection of teachers under section 16-e of the up intermediate education act, 1921, there was no written examination or allegation of irregularities concerning examination. iv. sachin kumar vs. delhi subordinate service selection board (dsssb) & ors10; in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-2023
..... w.p. no.4377/2023 30 31. manjula h. pammar d/o hanumantappa r. pammar aged about33years kahnniya residency, no.220 near commissioner of police office judge s quarters road, amarghol near navanagar hubli-580 025.32. sachin biradar s/o bapugouda biradar aged about26years a/p: korwar, tq: devarhipparagi dist: vijayapura-586 ..... appointments of untainted candidates of gazetted probationers of 2011 batch by promulgating karnataka civil services (validation of selection and appointment of 2011 batch, gazetted probationers) act, 2022. the case on hand is similar to that of gazetted probationers of 2011. hence, the untainted candidates in this case need to be protected ..... in favour of the applicants. we may record that in a.a. claton, involving the selection of teachers under section 16-e of the up intermediate education act, 1921, there was no written examination or allegation of irregularities concerning examination. iv. sachin kumar vs. delhi subordinate service selection board (dsssb) & ors10; in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-2023
..... w.p. no.4377/2023 30 31. manjula h. pammar d/o hanumantappa r. pammar aged about33years kahnniya residency, no.220 near commissioner of police office judge s quarters road, amarghol near navanagar hubli-580 025.32. sachin biradar s/o bapugouda biradar aged about26years a/p: korwar, tq: devarhipparagi dist: vijayapura-586 ..... appointments of untainted candidates of gazetted probationers of 2011 batch by promulgating karnataka civil services (validation of selection and appointment of 2011 batch, gazetted probationers) act, 2022. the case on hand is similar to that of gazetted probationers of 2011. hence, the untainted candidates in this case need to be protected ..... in favour of the applicants. we may record that in a.a. claton, involving the selection of teachers under section 16-e of the up intermediate education act, 1921, there was no written examination or allegation of irregularities concerning examination. iv. sachin kumar vs. delhi subordinate service selection board (dsssb) & ors10; in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-2023
..... w.p. no.4377/2023 30 31. manjula h. pammar d/o hanumantappa r. pammar aged about33years kahnniya residency, no.220 near commissioner of police office judge s quarters road, amarghol near navanagar hubli-580 025.32. sachin biradar s/o bapugouda biradar aged about26years a/p: korwar, tq: devarhipparagi dist: vijayapura-586 ..... appointments of untainted candidates of gazetted probationers of 2011 batch by promulgating karnataka civil services (validation of selection and appointment of 2011 batch, gazetted probationers) act, 2022. the case on hand is similar to that of gazetted probationers of 2011. hence, the untainted candidates in this case need to be protected ..... in favour of the applicants. we may record that in a.a. claton, involving the selection of teachers under section 16-e of the up intermediate education act, 1921, there was no written examination or allegation of irregularities concerning examination. iv. sachin kumar vs. delhi subordinate service selection board (dsssb) & ors10; in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-2023
..... w.p. no.4377/2023 30 31. manjula h. pammar d/o hanumantappa r. pammar aged about33years kahnniya residency, no.220 near commissioner of police office judge s quarters road, amarghol near navanagar hubli-580 025.32. sachin biradar s/o bapugouda biradar aged about26years a/p: korwar, tq: devarhipparagi dist: vijayapura-586 ..... appointments of untainted candidates of gazetted probationers of 2011 batch by promulgating karnataka civil services (validation of selection and appointment of 2011 batch, gazetted probationers) act, 2022. the case on hand is similar to that of gazetted probationers of 2011. hence, the untainted candidates in this case need to be protected ..... in favour of the applicants. we may record that in a.a. claton, involving the selection of teachers under section 16-e of the up intermediate education act, 1921, there was no written examination or allegation of irregularities concerning examination. iv. sachin kumar vs. delhi subordinate service selection board (dsssb) & ors10; in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-2023
..... w.p. no.4377/2023 30 31. manjula h. pammar d/o hanumantappa r. pammar aged about33years kahnniya residency, no.220 near commissioner of police office judge s quarters road, amarghol near navanagar hubli-580 025.32. sachin biradar s/o bapugouda biradar aged about26years a/p: korwar, tq: devarhipparagi dist: vijayapura-586 ..... appointments of untainted candidates of gazetted probationers of 2011 batch by promulgating karnataka civil services (validation of selection and appointment of 2011 batch, gazetted probationers) act, 2022. the case on hand is similar to that of gazetted probationers of 2011. hence, the untainted candidates in this case need to be protected ..... in favour of the applicants. we may record that in a.a. claton, involving the selection of teachers under section 16-e of the up intermediate education act, 1921, there was no written examination or allegation of irregularities concerning examination. iv. sachin kumar vs. delhi subordinate service selection board (dsssb) & ors10; in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-18-2023
..... teacher and that she was not regularly selected and appointed as teacher in the institution and, therefore, no question of conducting any department inquiry could arise. (e) that in the certificate of accused pradeep purporting to act in the capacity of the head master of the institution not only certified that experience of giving lessons to the students he further ..... the court of civil judge and jmfc., kushalnagar.6) criminal case no.429/2018 on the file ..... /2012 on the file of the court of prl. district and sessions judge, kodagu, madikeri.3) criminal case no.648/2012 on the file of the court of addl. civil judge and jmfc., somwarpet.4) criminal case no.1968/2013 on the file of the court of addl civil judge and jmfc., somwarpet5) criminal case no.428/2018 on the file of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-18-2023
..... representing the petitioner would vehemently contend that the crime so registered for offences punishable under section 13(1(b) r/w 13(2) of the act is loosely registered. no preliminary inquiry which is necessary to be conducted is not even conducted, no source report is drawn and there is no permission from the 6 competent authority to ..... at annexure a and b pending on the file of the23d additional chief metropolitan magistrate, at bengaluru now it has been transferred to lxxi additional city civil and sessions judge at bengaluru (cch-82) for the offence p/u/s.13(1)(b) r/w sec.13(2) of prevention of corruption act1988against the petitioner herein. ..... to further investigate the information, which is reduced in writing. the five judge bench of the apex court reiterates the judgment of five judge bench in the case of lalita kumari v. state of u.p.6 and observes that there shall be a preliminary inquiry held before recording fir. as observed hereinabove, the communication under section 66( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-20-2023
..... taking in adoption.45. in dhanno wd/o balbir singh vs. tuhi ram (died) represented by his lrs.23, a learned judge of the punjab & haryana high court, faced with the argument that section 16 of the act of 1956 required a registered adoption deed to be believed, held that the presumption thereunder, if any, is rebuttable and by ..... of the will to remove the suspicious circumstances.29. in bhagavathiammal vs. marimuthu ammal and others12, a learned judge of the madurai bench of the madras high court observed that the difference between section 68 and section 69 of the evidence act is that, in the former, one attesting witness, at least, has to be called for the purpose ..... the court ought to accept the same taking into consideration the presumption under section 16 of the act of 1956. ergo, the proving of the validity of the document is a must.38. much earlier, in kishori lal vs. mst. chaltibai16, a 3-judge bench of this court held that, as an adoption results in changing the course of succession .....
Tag this Judgment!