Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... officer, ftc & mact, mysuru and the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru, are hereby modified holding that the owner of the offending vehicles i.e., tata sumo and motorcycle respectively are liable to pay compensation to the claimants ..... is filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for brevity) fastening the liability on the insurance company to pay the compensation. mfa no.5338/2010 is filed ..... chikmagalur taluk respondents (by sri. n r ravikumar .,advocate for r2; r1 served) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated239.2011 passed in mvc no.91/2008 on the file of principal district judge & mmact, chikmagalur, awarding a compensation of rs.34,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... officer, ftc & mact, mysuru and the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru, are hereby modified holding that the owner of the offending vehicles i.e., tata sumo and motorcycle respectively are liable to pay compensation to the claimants ..... is filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for brevity) fastening the liability on the insurance company to pay the compensation. mfa no.5338/2010 is filed ..... chikmagalur taluk respondents (by sri. n r ravikumar .,advocate for r2; r1 served) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated239.2011 passed in mvc no.91/2008 on the file of principal district judge & mmact, chikmagalur, awarding a compensation of rs.34,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... officer, ftc & mact, mysuru and the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru, are hereby modified holding that the owner of the offending vehicles i.e., tata sumo and motorcycle respectively are liable to pay compensation to the claimants ..... is filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for brevity) fastening the liability on the insurance company to pay the compensation. mfa no.5338/2010 is filed ..... chikmagalur taluk respondents (by sri. n r ravikumar .,advocate for r2; r1 served) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated239.2011 passed in mvc no.91/2008 on the file of principal district judge & mmact, chikmagalur, awarding a compensation of rs.34,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... officer, ftc & mact, mysuru and the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru, are hereby modified holding that the owner of the offending vehicles i.e., tata sumo and motorcycle respectively are liable to pay compensation to the claimants ..... is filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for brevity) fastening the liability on the insurance company to pay the compensation. mfa no.5338/2010 is filed ..... chikmagalur taluk respondents (by sri. n r ravikumar .,advocate for r2; r1 served) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated239.2011 passed in mvc no.91/2008 on the file of principal district judge & mmact, chikmagalur, awarding a compensation of rs.34,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-08-2023
..... officer, ftc & mact, mysuru and the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru, are hereby modified holding that the owner of the offending vehicles i.e., tata sumo and motorcycle respectively are liable to pay compensation to the claimants ..... is filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2011 passed in m.v.c.no.91/2008 on the file of the prl. district judge and mact, chikmagaluru (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for brevity) fastening the liability on the insurance company to pay the compensation. mfa no.5338/2010 is filed ..... chikmagalur taluk respondents (by sri. n r ravikumar .,advocate for r2; r1 served) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated239.2011 passed in mvc no.91/2008 on the file of principal district judge & mmact, chikmagalur, awarding a compensation of rs.34,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-14-2023
..... of the regulations that we are concerned with and held : the sum and substance of these regulations is that even though a departmental inquiry instituted against an officer employee before his retirement can continue even after his retirement, none of the substantive penalties specified in regulation 4 of ..... be forfeited wholly or partially.46. xxx 47. thus considering the provisions of rules 34.2 and 34.3 of the cda rules, the inquiry can be continued given the deeming fiction in the same manner as if the employee had continued in service - 12 - wp no.109981 ..... .109981 of 2015 proceedings at annexure r3. it is seen from annexure r3 that one sri.k.krishnamurthy, senior branch manager was permitted to act as petitioner s defence assistant in the enquiry. during the course of enquiry, the petitioner had admitted that the list of witnesses and documents ..... found in the present case. the writ petition lacks merit and accordingly the same is dismissed. sd/- judge rsh/ct:bck list no.:1. sl no.: .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-15-2023
..... (by sri.p.prasanna kumar, spl. pp) this criminal appeal is filed under section214) of national investigation agency act, 2008, praying to set crl.a.no.1527/2022 2 aside the order of xlix additional city civil and sessions judge, special court for trail of nia cases (cch-50) bengaluru dated0807.2022 in crl.misc.no.6090/2022 and ..... judgment challenging the order of dismissal of his bail petition, accused no.16 in spl.c.c.no.320/2020 on the file of 69th addl. city civil and sessions judge (spl. court for trial of nia cases), bengaluru has preferred this appeal.2. the brief facts of the case are as follows: on 10.01.2020, shri niranjan ..... examination by an authorised or notified forensic authority that such currency imitates or compromises with the key security features as specified in the third schedule. (2) the terrorist act includes an act which constitutes an offence within the scope of, and as defined in any of the treaties specified in the second schedule.19. in the above section the term .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-16-2023
..... under sub-section (2), then, notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2-a), a, magistrate shall, without making any further inquiry, send the case for trial to the court of the special judge appointed under the criminal law amendment act, 1952. pausing here it may be mentioned that section 7(1) and (3) of the criminal law amendment ..... act, for tender of pardon to an accomplice, as part of the procedure and powers of special judges. the section is set out below [ 8 procedure and ..... which refer to courts of criminal jurisdiction established under the code. the special judge created under the criminal law amendment act, 1952 (act 46 of 1952) is not one of them. for the cases triable by special judges under the criminal law amendment act a special 2 (1968) 1 scr69515 provision is to be found in section 8(2) of that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-16-2023
..... of cr.p.c praying to set aside the judgment dated1411.2018 s.c.no.1322/2014 on the file of the lvi-addl. city civil & sessions judge, bengaluru city convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under sec. 302 of ipc and acquit the appellant from the crime and the appellant may be set ..... but the intention, knowledge, motive, whenever there is knowledge, proof of intention is unnecessary. if such proof is available, it may be useful for explaining an act which may be otherwise inexplicable. but it is not necessary to establish the crime, though its existence would naturally aggravate it. indeed, the presence of intention would ..... no constructive but an actual intention is required. intention and knowledge are the internal and invisible acts of the mind, and their actual existence cannot be demonstrated except by their external and visible manifestations. observation and experience enabled to judge the connection between men s conduct and their intention. the fact that such knowledge is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-16-2023
..... for our consideration is, i. whether the impugned judgment challenged herein suffers from any perversity or illegality warranting interference by this court?. ii. whether the learned sessions judge is justified in convicting the accused for the offences punishable under sections 448, 323, 341 and 302 of ipc?.11. this court being the appellate court, is ..... if it is committed without premeditation in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel and without the offender having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner. a careful reading of the aforesaid provisions makes it clear that to invoke the said provision, four requisites must be satisfied ..... under exception 4 to section 300 ipc. since the appellants inflicted injuries on the neck and scalp of sabbir shah with the intention of causing death and the act of the accused- appellants is punishable under section 304 part i ipc.20. the hon ble supreme court, while considering the provision of section 302 read .....
Tag this Judgment!