Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
..... transfer the matter to the special court.34. in the present case, there is no objective satisfaction of the requirement of section 20 of the act recorded by the prl. civil judge and jmfc, mandya and trial judge has proceeded to transfer the case as if the circular dated 22.03.2017 withdraws all the cases and transfers the same to the special ..... it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of which no one can foreshadow or adequately guard against.' 405 the statute as construed by the court of ..... association of india and others vs. telecom regulatory authority of india and others. 3627. (1996) 3 scc709 state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others.8. (1968) 3 scr662 air1969sc78 22 stc416: dhulabhai vs. state of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
..... transfer the matter to the special court.34. in the present case, there is no objective satisfaction of the requirement of section 20 of the act recorded by the prl. civil judge and jmfc, mandya and trial judge has proceeded to transfer the case as if the circular dated 22.03.2017 withdraws all the cases and transfers the same to the special ..... it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of which no one can foreshadow or adequately guard against.' 405 the statute as construed by the court of ..... association of india and others vs. telecom regulatory authority of india and others. 3627. (1996) 3 scc709 state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others.8. (1968) 3 scr662 air1969sc78 22 stc416: dhulabhai vs. state of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
..... transfer the matter to the special court.34. in the present case, there is no objective satisfaction of the requirement of section 20 of the act recorded by the prl. civil judge and jmfc, mandya and trial judge has proceeded to transfer the case as if the circular dated 22.03.2017 withdraws all the cases and transfers the same to the special ..... it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of which no one can foreshadow or adequately guard against.' 405 the statute as construed by the court of ..... association of india and others vs. telecom regulatory authority of india and others. 3627. (1996) 3 scc709 state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others.8. (1968) 3 scr662 air1969sc78 22 stc416: dhulabhai vs. state of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
..... transfer the matter to the special court.34. in the present case, there is no objective satisfaction of the requirement of section 20 of the act recorded by the prl. civil judge and jmfc, mandya and trial judge has proceeded to transfer the case as if the circular dated 22.03.2017 withdraws all the cases and transfers the same to the special ..... it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of which no one can foreshadow or adequately guard against.' 405 the statute as construed by the court of ..... association of india and others vs. telecom regulatory authority of india and others. 3627. (1996) 3 scc709 state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others.8. (1968) 3 scr662 air1969sc78 22 stc416: dhulabhai vs. state of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
..... transfer the matter to the special court.34. in the present case, there is no objective satisfaction of the requirement of section 20 of the act recorded by the prl. civil judge and jmfc, mandya and trial judge has proceeded to transfer the case as if the circular dated 22.03.2017 withdraws all the cases and transfers the same to the special ..... it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of which no one can foreshadow or adequately guard against.' 405 the statute as construed by the court of ..... association of india and others vs. telecom regulatory authority of india and others. 3627. (1996) 3 scc709 state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others.8. (1968) 3 scr662 air1969sc78 22 stc416: dhulabhai vs. state of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
..... transfer the matter to the special court.34. in the present case, there is no objective satisfaction of the requirement of section 20 of the act recorded by the prl. civil judge and jmfc, mandya and trial judge has proceeded to transfer the case as if the circular dated 22.03.2017 withdraws all the cases and transfers the same to the special ..... it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of which no one can foreshadow or adequately guard against.' 405 the statute as construed by the court of ..... association of india and others vs. telecom regulatory authority of india and others. 3627. (1996) 3 scc709 state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others.8. (1968) 3 scr662 air1969sc78 22 stc416: dhulabhai vs. state of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
..... transfer the matter to the special court.34. in the present case, there is no objective satisfaction of the requirement of section 20 of the act recorded by the prl. civil judge and jmfc, mandya and trial judge has proceeded to transfer the case as if the circular dated 22.03.2017 withdraws all the cases and transfers the same to the special ..... it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of which no one can foreshadow or adequately guard against.' 405 the statute as construed by the court of ..... association of india and others vs. telecom regulatory authority of india and others. 3627. (1996) 3 scc709 state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others.8. (1968) 3 scr662 air1969sc78 22 stc416: dhulabhai vs. state of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
..... transfer the matter to the special court.34. in the present case, there is no objective satisfaction of the requirement of section 20 of the act recorded by the prl. civil judge and jmfc, mandya and trial judge has proceeded to transfer the case as if the circular dated 22.03.2017 withdraws all the cases and transfers the same to the special ..... it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of which no one can foreshadow or adequately guard against.' 405 the statute as construed by the court of ..... association of india and others vs. telecom regulatory authority of india and others. 3627. (1996) 3 scc709 state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others.8. (1968) 3 scr662 air1969sc78 22 stc416: dhulabhai vs. state of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
..... transfer the matter to the special court.34. in the present case, there is no objective satisfaction of the requirement of section 20 of the act recorded by the prl. civil judge and jmfc, mandya and trial judge has proceeded to transfer the case as if the circular dated 22.03.2017 withdraws all the cases and transfers the same to the special ..... it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of which no one can foreshadow or adequately guard against.' 405 the statute as construed by the court of ..... association of india and others vs. telecom regulatory authority of india and others. 3627. (1996) 3 scc709 state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others.8. (1968) 3 scr662 air1969sc78 22 stc416: dhulabhai vs. state of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
..... transfer the matter to the special court.34. in the present case, there is no objective satisfaction of the requirement of section 20 of the act recorded by the prl. civil judge and jmfc, mandya and trial judge has proceeded to transfer the case as if the circular dated 22.03.2017 withdraws all the cases and transfers the same to the special ..... it appears. as said in the cohen grocery co. case, (us at p. 89: s.ct at p. 300): (l.ed p.520) ' .. it leaves open, therefore, the widest conceivable inquiry, the scope of which no one can foresee and the result of which no one can foreshadow or adequately guard against.' 405 the statute as construed by the court of ..... association of india and others vs. telecom regulatory authority of india and others. 3627. (1996) 3 scc709 state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others.8. (1968) 3 scr662 air1969sc78 22 stc416: dhulabhai vs. state of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m .....
Tag this Judgment!