Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE26H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.32560/2011 (MV) BETWEEN MOAHMMED @ MOHD.HANEEF S/O MODINA SAB MULLA AGE:36. YEARS, OCC: OWNER-CUM-DRIVER R/O KILLANKERA VILLAGE TQ.& DIST.YADGIR NOW RESIDING AT BANGALORE MANJUNATH NAGAR, BEHIND GANESH TEMPLE BANGALORE (BY SRI.GANESH NAIK, ADV.) AND1 2. MALLAYYA @ MALLAPPA S/O MASHAPPA KALANORE AGE:46. YEARS, OCC: AGCIRULTURE AND COOLIE, R/O BALICHAKRA VILLAGE TQ. & DIST. YADGIR THE GENERAL MANAGER SRI RAM GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD., RIICO INDUSTRIAL ARE, SHAPURA, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN - 302 022 ... APPELLANT (BY SRI.SHARANAGOUDA V. PATIL, ADV. FOR R1; SMT.SANGEETA BHADRASHETTY, ADV. FOR R2) ... RESPONDENTS2THIS MFA FILED U/S1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:23. 6.2011 IN MVC NO:233. 2010 THE FILE OF THE MEMBER ADDL. M.A.C.T AT YADGIR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION AND AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS. 1,35,00...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL APPEAL. NO.3636/2011 BETWEEN: CHANDPASHA S/O MOHAMMEDSAB LADAF, AGE:45. YEARS, R/O SHAHAPUR, TQ: SHAHAPUR, DIST: YADAGIR. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI ASHOK B. MULGE ADVOCATE FOR SRI BABURAO MANGANE, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE THROUGH P.S.I, EXCISE P.S., YADGIR. (BY SRI R.S. PATIL. GOVT. PLEADER) ... RESPONDENT2THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED IN SPL. CASE NO.1/2011 ON THE FILE OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, AT YADGIRI, DATED227.2011. CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S8AND25PUNISHABLE U/S20OF N.D.P.S ACT. THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON38.2015 FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT, THIS DAY THE COURT PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT First accused of a criminal case bearing Spl.Case No.01/2011, which was pending on the file of t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., praying to allow the appeal set aside the judgment and order passed in Spl. Case No. 1/2011 on the file of District and Sessions Judge, at Yadgiri, dated 22.7.2011. Convicting the Appellant/Accused for the offences P/U/S 8 and 25 punishable U/S 20 of N.D.P.S. Act.) 1. First accused of a criminal case bearing Spl. Case No. 01/2011, which was pending on the file of the Court of District and Sessions / Special Judge, Yadgiri, has filed this appeal under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. Accused has been found guilty of offence under Section 8 of N.D.P.S. Act punishable under Section 20 of the said Act, 1995. He is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and also to pay a fine of Rs. 1.00 Lakh vide judgment dated 25.07.2011. The conviction judgment dated 22.07.2011 and sentence of imprisonment on 25.07.2011, are called in question before this Court. 2. The facts leading to the following of this case are as follo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3676/2010 BETWEEN:1. 2.3. Santosh S/o Devindrappa Ambekar, Age:26. years, Occ: Electrician, R/o LTRT151, 15th Cross Shahabad Tq. Chittapur. Sushil S/o Devindrappa Ambekar, Age:21. years, Occ: Welder, R/o LTRT151, 15th Cross, Shahabad Devindrappa S/o Subh Age:26. years, Occ: Electrician, R/o House No.LTRT151 15th Cross, Shahabad, Tq. Chittapur. (By Sri: Baburao Mangane & Ashok B. Mulage, Advocates) ... APPELLANTS2AND: The State Through Shahbad Town Police Station, Dist. Gulbarga. (By Sri: Sheshadri Jayashankar M. HCGP) ... RESPONDENT This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the judgment and order dated 03.08.2010 passed in S.C.No.222/2009 by the Court of the III Additional Sessions Judge At Gulbarga, convicting the Appellants/ Accused for the offences P/U/S323 304(I) R/W Sec. 34 of IPC and th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the judgment and order dated 03.08.2010 passed in S.C.No. 222/2009 by the Court of the III Additional Sessions Judge at Gulbarga, convicting the Appellants/ Accused for the offences P/U/S 323, 304(I) R/W Sec 34 of IPC and the Appellant/Accused No. 1 to 3 are sentenced to undergo R.I. for Seven years each and to pay of fine of Rs. 10,000/- each, ID SI for one year each for the offence P/U/S 304 (I) of IPC. Further the Appellants/Accused No. 1 to 3 are sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- each ID SI for Two months each for the P/U/S 323 of IPC.) 1. This appeal is filed under Section 374, Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence passed in S.C. 222/09 which was pending on the file of III Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi. During the pendency of this appeal, the 3rd appellant died and hence the appeal against him has abated. 2. These appellants were charges earlier for the offenc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to quash the Town Police Station Crime No.239/2014 and also the entire proceedings pursuant thereof as against petitioner, pending on the file of Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bidar for the offence punishable under section 7, 8, 12, 13(2), 13(1) and 13(D) of P.C. Act to meet ends of Justice.) 1. An important issue has been raised in the present petition filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C. 2. The petitioner-Sharanappa is a judicial officer in the cadre of Senior Civil Judge. He is under suspension on serious allegation of misconduct. The said misconduct relates to alleged demand made by him for bribe and receipt of bribe from a party to do official favour in civil cases pending before him. A criminal case has been registered in Crime No.239/14 against this petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 8, 12, 13(2), 13(1) and 13(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act by the respondent-Basavakalyan...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2007 passed in W.C.No.120/2006 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Raichur, awarding a compensation of Rs.1,66,440/- with interest @ 12% p.a. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2007 passed in W.C.No.118/2006 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Raichur, awarding a compensation of Rs.2,20,308/- with interest @ 12% p.a. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2007 passed in W.C.No.119/2006 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Raichur District, Raichur, awarding a compensation of Rs.1,77,050/with interest @ 12% p.a. This Miscellaneous First appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF AUGUST2015MFA NO.9805 OF2007c.w. MFA Nos.9641, 9804 and 9806 of 2007(WC) MFA9805OF2007: BETWEEN: THE BRANCH MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, RAICHUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS, DEPUTY MANAGER, B.A. KRISHNA MURTHY, BANGALORE REGIONAL OFFICE, SHUBHARAM COMPLEX, M.G. ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001. (BY SMT. PREETI PATIL, ADVOCATE.) ..APPELLANT2AND:1. 2. SURESHA S/O PAPAIAH, MAJOR, MASKI VILLAGE, LINGASUGUR TALUK, RAICHUR DISTRICT. ASHOK JAIN JAIN, S.C., MAJOR, C/O NEW MAHARASTRA- TRANSPORT OFFICE, OPPOSITE TO GRAMEENA POLICE STATION, CHITRADURGA. (BY SRI. PRAKASH YELI, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 SERVED) RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 30 (1) OF WC ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED1503.2007 PASSED IN W.C.NO.120/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR OFFICER & COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN COMPENSATION, RAICHUR, AWARDING A COMEPNSATION OF RS.1,66,440/- W...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
(Prayer: This Crl.A. is filed u/s.374 (2) of Cr.P.C by the advocate for the appellants praying that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to, set aside the judgement and order of conviction dated 30.09.2010 passed by the III Addl. Sessions Judge at Bijapur in Sessions Case No. 28/2009, thereby convicting the Appellants / Accused No. 1 and 6 for the offence p/u/s 324 and 326 r/w Sec. 149 of IPC and the Appellants / Accused No. 1 and 6 are sentenced to undergo for a period of six months and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- each. in default, they shall undergo further is for a period of one month for the offence p/u/s 326 r/w sec. 149 of IPC further the appellants / accused no. 1 to 6 are sentenced to undergo for a period of three months and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- each. in default they shall undergo further is for a period of fifteen days for the offence p/u/s 324 of IPC r/w Sec. 149 of IPC. This Crl.A. is filed u/s. 372 of Cr.P.C by the advocate for appellant praying that this Hon'ble court to...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C by the advocate for appellant praying that this Hon'ble court to set aside the order of conviction and sentence including fine dated 12.12.2012 in S.C.No.19/2012 passed by the I Additional Sessions Judge at Gulbarga, convicting the accused/ appellant p/u/s 302 of IPC, etc.) 1. Appellant was the sole accused in a criminal case in S.C.19/12 which was pending on the file of I Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi. He has been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under Section 302, I.P.C. and also to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- vide considered judgment of conviction dated 12.12.2012. Charge had been framed to that effect by the I Additional Sessions Judge on 5.4.2012. He had pleaded not guilty and had claimed to be tried. 2. The gist of the prosecution case as found in the charges levelled against him is that deceased- Sharanappa and this accused were residents of Adki village,...
Tag this Judgment!