Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Court: us supreme court Year: 1967 Page 7 of about 89 results (0.160 seconds)

Ramekbal Tiwary Vs. Madan Mohan Tiwary and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1156; 1967(0)BLJR646; 1967CriLJ1076; [1967]2SCR368

..... by the court of session and that an accused person has been improperly discharged by the inferior court, the sessions judge or district magistrate may cause him to be arrested, any may thereupon, instead of directing a fresh inquiry, order him to be committed for trial upon the matter of which he has been, in the opinion of ..... offence and, having done so, may proceed as regards the minor offence or offences under chapter xxi or other appropriate chapter. in fact, a magistrate cannot proceed to act under the latter part of sub-section (1) of section 209 until he has 'discharged' the accused under the former part of the sub-section. this is the ..... appellant because section 403(4) provides that a person acquitted or convicted of any offence constituted by any acts may, notwithstanding such acquittal or conviction, be subsequently charged with, and tried for, any other offence constituted by the same acts which he may have committed if the court by which he was first tried was not competent to .....

Mine Workers Vs. Illinois Bar Assn.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... activity of the union is related to expression, and therefore is of a type which may be sheltered from state regulation by the constitution. but the majority's inquiry does not stop there; it goes on to examine the state concerns and concludes that the decree "is not needed to protect the state's interest in high ..... ins. co., 336 u. s. 220 , 336 u. s. 222 -225. it is also irrelevant whether we would proscribe the union plan were we sitting as state judges or state legislators. the sole issue before us is whether the illinois supreme court is forbidden to do so because the plan unduly impinges upon rights guaranteed to the union ..... union employs a licensed lawyer, solely compensated by an annual salary, to represent members and their dependents in connection with their claims under the illinois workmen's compensation act. the trial court found that the union's employment of the attorney constituted unauthorized practice of law, and enjoined the union from "[e]mploying attorneys on salary or .....

Boutilier Vs. Ins

Court : US Supreme Court

..... have already quoted from clinical experts to show what a wide range the term "psychopathic personality" has. another expert [ footnote 4 ] classifies such a person under three headings: acting: (1) inability to withstand tedium, (2) lack of a sense of responsibility, (3) a tendency to "blow up" under pressure, (4) maladjustment to law and ..... the purely legal question of whether the term "psychopathic personality" included homosexuals and if it suffered illegality because of vagueness. ii the legislative history of the act indicates beyond a shadow of a doubt that the congress intended the phrase "psychopathic personality" to include homosexuals such as petitioner. page 387 u. s ..... petitioner's appeal from the page 387 u. s. 119 finding of the special inquiry officer was dismissed by the board of immigration appeals, without opinion, and his petition for review in the court of appeals was dismissed, with one judge dissenting. 363 f.2d 488. it held that the term "psychopathic personality," as .....

Giles Vs. Maryland

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the girl and foster is open to the construction that these key witnesses deliberately concealed from the judge, jury, and defense counsel evidence of the girl's promiscuity. [ footnote 6 ] while, under the law of maryland, specific acts of misconduct are inadmissible to impeach a witness' credibility, rau v. state, 133 md. 613, ..... juvenile proceeding) or of the fact that montgomery county police officials knew of such evidence. if a new hearing is held in the state courts, an inquiry into these matters might be deemed appropriate. [ footnote 7 ] the record before us affirmatively demonstrates that both detective collins and mr. kardy, who supervised the ..... by the plurality is bottomed upon materials entirely outside the record before us, furnished to this court after the case was submitted, under the leverage of inquiries put from the bench during the argument. the materials are two pre-indictment police reports, the montgomery county officers' report and the supplementary offense report. .....

National Woodwork Mfrs. Assn. Vs. Nlrb

Court : US Supreme Court

..... determination whether the "will not handle" sentence of rule 17 and its enforcement violated 8(e) and 8(b)(4)(b) cannot be made without an inquiry into whether, under all the surrounding circumstances, [ footnote 38 ] the union's objective was preservation of work for frouge's employees, or whether the ..... it aimed to restrict the area of industrial conflict insofar as this could be achieved by prohibiting the most obvious, widespread, and, as congress evidently judged, dangerous practice of unions to widen that conflict: the coercion of neutral employers, themselves not concerned with a primary labor dispute, through the inducement ..... and characterized the latter as preserving "the established distinction between primary activities and secondary boycotts." but the "established distinction" embodied in the taft-hartley act and recognized by the courts classified product boycotts as secondary, and illegal. the floor debates show that both proponents and opponents of the landrum-griffin .....

Nlrb Vs. Allis-chalmers Mfg. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... security provision in the contract under which a substantial minority of the employees may have been forced into membership." 358 f.2d at 660. but the relevant inquiry here is not what motivated a member's full membership, but whether the taft-hartley amendments prohibited disciplinary measures against a full member who crossed his union' ..... the court of appeals for the seventh circuit, a panel of that court upheld the board's decision. following a rehearing en banc, however, the court, three judges dissenting, withdrew the panel opinion, held that the locals' conduct violated 8(b)(1)(a), and remanded to the board for appropriate proceedings. 358 f.2d 656 ..... [ footnote 30 ] however, page 388 u. s. 193 even were there evidence that congress shared this concern, [ footnote 31 ]this would not justify reading the act also to bar court enforcement of reasonable fines. [ footnote 32 ] the 1959 landrum-griffin amendments, thought to be the first comprehensive regulation by congress of the conduct of .....

United States Vs. Arnold, Schwinn and Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in order to make a judgment as to whether the restraint is or is not "reasonable" in the special sense in which 1 of the sherman act must be read for purposes of this type of inquiry. chicago board of trade v. united states, 246 u. s. 231 , 246 u. s. 238 (1918); standard oil co. v. ..... it was indeed "good business practice," we should not quarrel with schwinn's eloquent submission or the finding of the trial court. but our inquiry cannot stop at that point. our inquiry is whether, assuming nonpredatory motives and business purposes and the incentive of profit and volume considerations, the effect upon competition in the marketplace is ..... there is often serious question whether the latter conduct involves the "contract, combination . . . or conspiracy" required by 1 of the sherman act, 26 stat. 209, as amended, 15 u.s.c. 1. the district judge in this case refused to find that the relevant conduct of schwinn and its distributors amounted to a "contract," "combination" or "conspiracy." .....

Gardner Vs. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... mercy of counsel's ability to marshall and deploy horrible examples which logic may accommodate, but the reality of administration would repel. our training as lawyers and judges, our respect for the administrative process, and our awareness of the complexities of life should warn us not to fall into the trap of abstract, generalized, ..... and destructive in its implications as illustrated by the present application. as will appear, i believe that this approach improperly and unwisely gives individual federal district judges a roving commission to halt the regulatory process, and to do so on the basis of abstractions and generalities instead of concrete fact situations, and that ..... in ewing, 339 u.s. at 339 u. s. 599 , a case under the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, the court held "it is not a requirement of due process that there be judicial inquiry before discretion can be exercised. it is sufficient, where only property rights are concerned, that there is at some stage an .....

In Re Gault

Court : US Supreme Court

..... not merely technical or historical, but, like the hearsay rule, have a sound basis in human experience, they should not be rejected in any judicial inquiry. juvenile court judges in los angeles, tucson, and wisconsin rapids, wisconsin report that they are satisfied with the operation of their courts despite application of unrelaxed rules of evidence ..... children's bureau pub. no. 437-1966, p. 47 (hereinafter cited as standards); new york family court act 721 (1963) (hereinafter cited as n.y.family court act). the court also held that the judge may consider hearsay if it is "of a kind on which reasonable men are accustomed to rely in serious affairs ..... 's protection, and not with his punishment. i do not question that the methods employed in such cases must be consistent with the constitutional obligation to act in accordance with due process, but certainly the fourteenth amendment does not demand that they be constricted by the procedural guarantees devised for ordinary criminal prosecutions. .....

Longshoremen Vs. Marine Trade Assn.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a rule to show cause why the union and its officers should not be held in contempt for violating the september 15 order. without explaining precisely what acts violated the order, the judge held the february strike "illegal . . . under the circumstances," found the union in civil contempt, and fined the union $100,000 per day. ..... points in the proceedings, it appeared that the alleged violation consisted of the work stoppage during the last few days of february; but at other times, the inquiry focused upon the union's request for a grievance meeting on february 28 to discuss the latest set-back problem. "why," counsel for the association asked, ..... client." "mr. scanlan: no, i have nothing further, your honor." "the court: the hearing is closed." thus, despite counsel's repeated requests, the district judge steadfastly refused to explain the meaning of the order. when further set-back disputes disrupted work throughout the port of philadelphia in late february, 1966, the district court issued .....