Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jan-12-1967
Reported in : AIR1967Raj267; 1967CriLJ1702
..... trial with respect to each distinct offence. the object evidently is that the attention of the trial court should be directed to the evidence relating to the charge under inquiry and irrelevant matter should be excluded. this object is not achieved by adopting such procedure but defeated by placing on the record mere copies of the statements of ..... run concurrently. 2. it is needless to state the prosecution case as both the appeals can be disposed, of on the question of illegality committed by the trial judge in recording the evidence of the witnesses. it is urged by the learned counsel for the appellant that five prosecution witnesses were examined in case no. 9 but their ..... khan v. emperor, air 1928 lah 34, a person was tried separately for two offences namely, section 307, i.p.c. and section 20 of the indian arms act. the witnesses in the two cases were more or less the same. the trying magistrate recorded the evidence of the witnesses in one case and the copies thereof were taken .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Oct-27-1967
Reported in : (1969)ILLJ382Raj
..... is difficult to say that the s.c.o.g. had prejudged the conduct of the petitioner and the proposed penalty for the alleged charges before making any inquiry into them.11. article 311 of the constitution affords a constitutional guarantee to a public servant that he shall not be dismissed or removed or demoted by ..... considered that these two circumstances are not such as are consistent with the acceptance of the money by the petitioner. it was further observed by the learned judge that:in order to find a person guilty on circumstantial evidence, the circumstance or the circumstances must be such as would irresistibly lead to an inference of ..... neglect of duty was established against the petitioner, but in the absence of any direct evidence they found it difficult to hold the petitioner guilty for positive act of deliberately undercharging the marriage party of murarilal's son especially when there was evidence to show that the petitioner had charged thirteen members of the marriage party .....
Tag this Judgment!