Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-15-2021
..... c) of the rules.9. before examining the issues involved in these writ petitions, it is necessary to reproduce the relevant provisions of act, 1965 and rules, 1968 for ready reference:31. "section 71(2)(e) of the act reads thus: 71. power to make rules.- (1) the state government may, by notification and after previous publication, make rules to ..... in the sense that it is manifestly arbitrary . drawing a comparison between the law in england and in india, the court further observed that in england that the judges would say parliament never intended the authority to make such rule; they are unreasonable and untravirus. in india, arbitrariness is not a separate ground since it will come within ..... . the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of sai chalchitra is rendered by the apex court 45 consisting of two learned judges. the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of jasbhai is by a larger bench and by following the said decision it is held that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-15-2021
..... c) of the rules.9. before examining the issues involved in these writ petitions, it is necessary to reproduce the relevant provisions of act, 1965 and rules, 1968 for ready reference:31. "section 71(2)(e) of the act reads thus: 71. power to make rules.- (1) the state government may, by notification and after previous publication, make rules to ..... in the sense that it is manifestly arbitrary . drawing a comparison between the law in england and in india, the court further observed that in england that the judges would say parliament never intended the authority to make such rule; they are unreasonable and untravirus. in india, arbitrariness is not a separate ground since it will come within ..... . the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of sai chalchitra is rendered by the apex court 45 consisting of two learned judges. the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of jasbhai is by a larger bench and by following the said decision it is held that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-15-2021
..... c) of the rules.9. before examining the issues involved in these writ petitions, it is necessary to reproduce the relevant provisions of act, 1965 and rules, 1968 for ready reference:31. "section 71(2)(e) of the act reads thus: 71. power to make rules.- (1) the state government may, by notification and after previous publication, make rules to ..... in the sense that it is manifestly arbitrary . drawing a comparison between the law in england and in india, the court further observed that in england that the judges would say parliament never intended the authority to make such rule; they are unreasonable and untravirus. in india, arbitrariness is not a separate ground since it will come within ..... . the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of sai chalchitra is rendered by the apex court 45 consisting of two learned judges. the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of jasbhai is by a larger bench and by following the said decision it is held that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-15-2021
..... c) of the rules.9. before examining the issues involved in these writ petitions, it is necessary to reproduce the relevant provisions of act, 1965 and rules, 1968 for ready reference:31. "section 71(2)(e) of the act reads thus: 71. power to make rules.- (1) the state government may, by notification and after previous publication, make rules to ..... in the sense that it is manifestly arbitrary . drawing a comparison between the law in england and in india, the court further observed that in england that the judges would say parliament never intended the authority to make such rule; they are unreasonable and untravirus. in india, arbitrariness is not a separate ground since it will come within ..... . the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of sai chalchitra is rendered by the apex court 45 consisting of two learned judges. the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of jasbhai is by a larger bench and by following the said decision it is held that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-15-2021
..... c) of the rules.9. before examining the issues involved in these writ petitions, it is necessary to reproduce the relevant provisions of act, 1965 and rules, 1968 for ready reference:31. "section 71(2)(e) of the act reads thus: 71. power to make rules.- (1) the state government may, by notification and after previous publication, make rules to ..... in the sense that it is manifestly arbitrary . drawing a comparison between the law in england and in india, the court further observed that in england that the judges would say parliament never intended the authority to make such rule; they are unreasonable and untravirus. in india, arbitrariness is not a separate ground since it will come within ..... . the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of sai chalchitra is rendered by the apex court 45 consisting of two learned judges. the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of jasbhai is by a larger bench and by following the said decision it is held that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-15-2021
..... c) of the rules.9. before examining the issues involved in these writ petitions, it is necessary to reproduce the relevant provisions of act, 1965 and rules, 1968 for ready reference:31. "section 71(2)(e) of the act reads thus: 71. power to make rules.- (1) the state government may, by notification and after previous publication, make rules to ..... in the sense that it is manifestly arbitrary . drawing a comparison between the law in england and in india, the court further observed that in england that the judges would say parliament never intended the authority to make such rule; they are unreasonable and untravirus. in india, arbitrariness is not a separate ground since it will come within ..... . the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of sai chalchitra is rendered by the apex court 45 consisting of two learned judges. the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of jasbhai is by a larger bench and by following the said decision it is held that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-15-2021
..... c) of the rules.9. before examining the issues involved in these writ petitions, it is necessary to reproduce the relevant provisions of act, 1965 and rules, 1968 for ready reference:31. "section 71(2)(e) of the act reads thus: 71. power to make rules.- (1) the state government may, by notification and after previous publication, make rules to ..... in the sense that it is manifestly arbitrary . drawing a comparison between the law in england and in india, the court further observed that in england that the judges would say parliament never intended the authority to make such rule; they are unreasonable and untravirus. in india, arbitrariness is not a separate ground since it will come within ..... . the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of sai chalchitra is rendered by the apex court 45 consisting of two learned judges. the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of jasbhai is by a larger bench and by following the said decision it is held that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-15-2021
..... c) of the rules.9. before examining the issues involved in these writ petitions, it is necessary to reproduce the relevant provisions of act, 1965 and rules, 1968 for ready reference:31. "section 71(2)(e) of the act reads thus: 71. power to make rules.- (1) the state government may, by notification and after previous publication, make rules to ..... in the sense that it is manifestly arbitrary . drawing a comparison between the law in england and in india, the court further observed that in england that the judges would say parliament never intended the authority to make such rule; they are unreasonable and untravirus. in india, arbitrariness is not a separate ground since it will come within ..... . the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of sai chalchitra is rendered by the apex court 45 consisting of two learned judges. the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of jasbhai is by a larger bench and by following the said decision it is held that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-15-2021
..... c) of the rules.9. before examining the issues involved in these writ petitions, it is necessary to reproduce the relevant provisions of act, 1965 and rules, 1968 for ready reference:31. "section 71(2)(e) of the act reads thus: 71. power to make rules.- (1) the state government may, by notification and after previous publication, make rules to ..... in the sense that it is manifestly arbitrary . drawing a comparison between the law in england and in india, the court further observed that in england that the judges would say parliament never intended the authority to make such rule; they are unreasonable and untravirus. in india, arbitrariness is not a separate ground since it will come within ..... . the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of sai chalchitra is rendered by the apex court 45 consisting of two learned judges. the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of jasbhai is by a larger bench and by following the said decision it is held that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jun-15-2021
..... c) of the rules.9. before examining the issues involved in these writ petitions, it is necessary to reproduce the relevant provisions of act, 1965 and rules, 1968 for ready reference:31. "section 71(2)(e) of the act reads thus: 71. power to make rules.- (1) the state government may, by notification and after previous publication, make rules to ..... in the sense that it is manifestly arbitrary . drawing a comparison between the law in england and in india, the court further observed that in england that the judges would say parliament never intended the authority to make such rule; they are unreasonable and untravirus. in india, arbitrariness is not a separate ground since it will come within ..... . the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of sai chalchitra is rendered by the apex court 45 consisting of two learned judges. the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of jasbhai is by a larger bench and by following the said decision it is held that the .....
Tag this Judgment!