Array ( [0] => ..... as well as the amended provisions of the act which came into effect from 14.11.1994 in a number of cases. the law with regard to the liability of the insurance company in respect of passengers being carried in a goods vehicle is now settled. a three-judge bench of apex court in new india assurance co. ..... ltd. v. asha rani : air2003sc607 , considered the question whether it is compulsory for the insurance company to cover the liability in respect of passengers travelling in a goods vehicle. this decision was in context of the unamended act. the apex court overruled ..... of goods or his representative dies or suffers any bodily injury.7. justice s.b. sinha in his concurring judgment held as follows:(25) section 147 of 1988 act, inter alia, prescribes compulsory coverage against death of or bodily injury to any passenger of a 'public service vehicle'. proviso appended thereto categorically states that compulsory coverage ..... [1] => ..... 2a. its reading shows that the policy did not cover the risk of passengers except employees not exceeding six in number, coming under the purview of the workmen's compensation act, 1923.9. in view of the above discussed position, it is held that there was no contract of insurance between the insured, i.e., respondent sanjay kumar, ..... .4.1994, that is to say, prior to the amendment of section 147 of the motor vehicles act by motor vehicles (amendment) act, 1994.7. a three-judge bench of the hon'ble apex court, while interpreting section 147 of the motor vehicles act, as it stood prior to the amendment of 1994, has held that the provision did not require ..... result of which some persons on board the truck as passengers, died and some other sustained injuries. the claim petitions were filed, under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, seeking award of compensation. the appellant, who was impleaded as respondent on account of its being the insurer of the truck, took the plea that the persons who ..... [2] => ..... intention of the parliament to the contrary. section 53, as it is in force, presently, has been enacted by way of substitution by the central act 44 of 1966 with effect from january 28, 1968, for the then existing section. a careful perusal of the previous section 53, as it existed prior to its substitution, would disclose that it not ..... high court of bombay by means of a writ petition, which was dismissed by the learned single judge summarily on the ground that the management had an alternative remedy by way of an appeal under section 30 of the workmen's compensation act. the management then preferred an appeal. the division bench held that in view of the bar ..... and not to the case where the claimants came to the forum under the workmen's compensation act without availing or claiming any benefit under the employees' state insurance act.9. the decision in 1987 acj 983 (supra) of the learned single judge of the madhya pradesh high court in our view will be of no relevance when the question ..... [3] => ..... 2 was solely responsible.8. mr. k.s. pathania refers to re. davis v. kesto routh air 1968 calcutta 129, wherein the learned judges, after referring to certain english decisions, observed as under:.the principle underlying all these cases is that an act which is reasonable or necessary, having regard to all the circumstances, though not one which is part of ..... physically, which is receiving of an injury by a workman during the course of employment and within the meaning of section 3 of the act.10. in shantaben v. new raipur mills co. ltd. 1968 acj 417 (gujarat), it has been observed as follows:.we are of the view that a pre-existing disease or infirmity would not by ..... climbing three storeys; the question was whether the death of the deceased could be said as one arising out of and in the course of employment? the learned judge answered the same by saying that the deceased died in the course of employment but there was no causal connection between heart failure and employment nor could it be ..... [4] => ..... remedy for him? is he to surrender to the product of the fraud and thereby become a conduit to enrich the imposter unjustly? the learned single judge who indicated some other alternative remedy did not unfortunately spell out what is the other remedy which the appellant insurance company could pursue with.finally, it was ..... the aforesaid judgment before the supreme court, even though related to the extent of the right of appeal available to an insurer under section 173 of the act, and the corresponding limitations upon the insurer not being able to extend this right, or enlarge its scope in view of the restricted and specified defences ..... of approval whether the award is perverse, absurd, ridiculously low or abnormally excessive. this can never be the intention of any legislation including provisions of motor vehicles act, even when defences of the petitioner are limited. he further submitted that tribunal being subordinate to this court, even in an appropriate case where otherwise it ..... [5] => ..... (2) of section 95 of the act. for coming to this conclusion the learned judges had followed law laid down in pushpabai purshottam udeshi v. ranjit ginning and pressing co. 1977 acj 343 (sc), where it was held that the ..... in the vehicle. interpreting this provision in national insurance co. ltd. v. jugal kishore 1988 acj 270 (sc), learned judges of the supreme court held that notwithstanding the limits provided in sub-section (2) of section 95 of the act, it was open to the insurer to take policy covering higher risk than contemplated by clause (a) of sub-section ..... insurer can always take policies covering risks which are not required to be covered under section 95 of the act. it was observed that in case ..... [6] => ..... which was false in some material particular.8. to this general rule, exception is contained in section 170 of motor vehicles act, 1988, which is also reproduced herein below:170. impleading insurer in certain cases.-where in the course of any inquiry, the claims tribunal is satisfied that-(a) there is collusion between the person making the claim and the person against ..... . magikhia das 1976 acj 239 (orissa); new india assurance co. ltd. v. shiv kumar 1978 acj 137 (mp) and ramesh chandra v. randhir singh 1978 acj 252 (allahabad)]. learned single judge of this court in para 12 of oriental fire & genljns. co. ltd. v. mast ram 1989 acj 1120 (hp), held that:12. now, coming to the issue of compensation, although ..... [7] => ..... life. public authorities or persons who have committed no wrong, cannot be compelled to pay compensation to legal heirs-claimants of such reckless and adventurous persons.16. a single judge of orissa high court in divisional manager, national insurance co. ltd. v. rabi sahoo 2001 acj 538 (orissa), was concerned with a case where the driver did not ..... its liability, it is not open to this court to accept the plea of the insurance company by a process of judicial interpretation of the provisions of the motor vehicles act.15. a division bench of madhya pradesh high court in chhote khan v. rajesh kumar agrawal : (1999)iillj181mp , took a different view and held as follows:(2) ..... relationship. the award made is not to the 'driver' of the vehicle but to the worker of the employer as defined under section 2(1)(n) of the act. that apart, all that the relevant clause in the insurance policy requires is that the person driving the vehicle should have a valid driving licence. that the deceased admittedly ..... [8] => ..... in the motor accidents:before dealing with that question, it will beneficial for us to keep in mind the principles governing determination of a just compensation contemplated under the act. it is trite, bodily injury is to be treated as a deprivation, which entitles a claimant to damages. the amount of damages vary according to gravity of the ..... is entitled to compensation for disability suffered in the accident. his lordship has held as under:whenever, in a petition filed under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988, it comes out as an admitted fact that a person has suffered permanent disability on account of an injury caused to him by or through an accident ..... so drive a transport vehicle (other than a motorcab or motor cycle hired for his own use or rented under any scheme made under section 75(2) of the act) unless his driving licence specifically entitled him-so to do. section 2(47) defines transport vehicle to mean a public service vehicle, a goods carriage, an education ..... [9] => ..... to be third parties. it is, therefore, obvious that the apex court has not upheld the view expressed by certain courts including the view expressed by a learned single judge in noor dass' case supra that other than the insurer and insured, all other persons are third parties. therefore, this plea of the claimants cannot be accepted. it ..... return of the petition on the ground that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the same. against this order, a revision petition was filed wherein a learned single judge of this court held as follows:the petitioner has filed a petition claiming compensation on account of loss of consignment of apple boxes. these boxes were loaded in ..... it was clearly held that the consignor is not a third party and the claim petition under the act is not maintainable.24. in mayuddin abbasmiya malik v. shanabhai shankerbhai valand and anr. : 1992 (2), acj 881, a learned single judge of the gujarat high court held that the insurance company cannot be held liable in view of the ..... [10] => ..... and favour m/s gupta pipes dharampur with an ulterior move prompted by consideration of financial gain to themselves. detailing the above charges with a view to judge whether the relief sought for by the petitioner is available to him or not would be essential in the facts and circumstances of this case. 3. petitioner ..... the offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 471, 511 and 120-b of the penal code besides under section 5(2)--(d) of the prevention of corruption act. the basis of the first information report is the enquiry report of the divisional commissioner, shimla, which consists of two parts. the first part thereof deals with ..... petitioner that before lodging the first information report, no effort was made for conducting an inquiry. rather the record shows that case against the petitioner was got registered after examining the records and after making a detailed inquiry. the said inquiry is the basis of the impugned first information report. the allegations with respect to serious ..... [11] => ..... in that case, their lordships were dealing with expression 'development scheme' as defined in clause (1) of the explanation to section 71 of the kerala revenue recovery act, 1968, and said that 'development scheme' is an exclusive definition and the respondent-bank has not been able to show that the bank has framed any 'development scheme' and ..... corporation, air 1981 kar 193, and the decision of this court in leela dutt v. himachal pradesh financial corporation [1998] 93 comp cas 388. the learned judges of the karnataka high court have held that the certificate issued by the managing director to the deputy commissioner for recovery of loans due as arrears of land revenue ..... authors submitting books for selection was a member of the committee rendered the selection of the books vitiated on the ground of bias of such member. the judges held that the author-member could subtly influence the minds of the other members against selecting books by other authors in preference to his own and it ..... [12] => ..... 22. in management, bangalore woollen, cotton and silk mills co. ltd. v. workmen and anr., air 1968 sc 585 : 1968-i-llj-555, the hon'ble supreme court considered the provisions of the act, the industrial disputes act, 1947, and jurisdiction of industrial tribunal to adjudicate upon matters covered by the standing orders. referring to several ..... 352. in that case, draft standing orders submitted by the corporation and certified by the appellate authority permitted the delinquent workman to be defended in a departmental inquiry by a fellow workman of his choice, who must be an employee of the corporation. the model standing orders, however, allowed such representation by an ..... passed by the high court were set aside.33. strong reliance was, however, placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on a decision of a single judge of the high court of allahabad in 'bijli mazdoor sangh v. resident engineer, allahabad electric supply undertaking, u.p. state electricity board, allahabad and ors., ..... [13] => ..... being rejected by the tribunal on the ground that the same was barred by limitation and no sufficient cause for condonation of delay was made out. the learned judge, after examining all the facts and circumstances of the case and the principles to be applied for the interpretation of 'sufficient cause' under proviso to section 110- ..... the claim petition should have been dismissed as barred by time and the tribunal was not justified in condoning the delay. dealing with the question, the learned judge rejected the objection regarding delay after seeing that the result of the accident was that the claimant was an utter wreck having sustained fracture of the skull, dislocation ..... for four months and thereafter the claimant went to his village to meet his parents for a few days and then made inquiries and came to know that he could file an application under the motor vehicles act. the explanation was not found sufficient by the tribunal and it rejected the claim petition. however, in appeal, a ..... [14] => ..... during the summary general court martial proceedings also made a confessional statement on 14th december, 1992 before the court when he was warned by the presiding offier, members, judge advocate of the court martial that in case he made such a confession, he would not be entitled to any leniency from the court and despite the warning the ..... various judgments of the supreme court in jai dev v. state of punjab air 1963 sc 612 : (1963 (1) cri lj 495), munshi ram v. delhi administration, air 1968 sc 702 : (1968 cri lj 806), state of u.p. v. ram swarup, air 1974 sc 1570: (1974 cri lj 1035), mohan singh v. state of punjab, air 1975 sc 2161 ..... commission of offence of murder of lance nk. partap singh.4. the petitioner was chargesheeted under section 69 of the army act for committing a civil offence under section 302 of the ranbir penal code. after preliminary inquiry the general court martial was constituted. the prosecution examined 13 witnesses and the petitioner appeared in defence as dw 1. his ..... [15] => ..... the ground stated was justified. the appellants claimed limitation from the time spent in taking the copy of the judgment of the trial court. under section 12 of the limitation act. that time could not be taken into consideration (see: custodian. evacuee property punjab v. prabhu dayal chhajan lal (air 1960 pun 298)). apart from this, there was ..... was time barred by three days, (d) that the judgment of the trial court was not filed, and (e) that the application was given under section 5, limitation act. which also contained the prayer for permission to file a copy of trial court's judgment. the application was. however, not supported by an affidavit. the deputy registrar ..... d.b. lal, j.1. this second appeal is directed against the decision dated 11-12-1968 of the district judge simla, wherein the decision of the senior sub-judge chamba in a suit for declaration and possession relating to 35 bighas and odd land situate in mohal balana. pargana bhatti tikri of district chamba, has been ..... [16] => ..... all proceedings on the original side. in other words rule 19 is meant for jurisdiction to be exercised under section 5 (2) of the delhi high court act, 1966. the learned single judge in the instant case never exercised that category of jurisdiction- this being the position rule 19 of the delhi high court (original side) rules, 1967 will ..... of west bengal (air 1967 cal 275); asst. district panchayat officer rae bareli v. jai narain pradhan (air 1967 all 334); mall singh v. smt. laksha kumari khaitan (1968 all lj 210) and lalman gupta v. state of u. p., lucknow (1970 all lj 1379). but the argument still remains that only provisions regarding procedure as contained in ..... delhi high court and is now applicable to himachal pradesh high court. if authority is needed, reference can be made to ashok kumar v. administrator himachal pradesh (1968 delhi lt 82). therefore, clause 10 of the letters patent is the only relevant provision under which an appeal could be filed. the order, of the learned single ..... [17] => ..... which the stay order passed by this court in the present suit was in operation. an appeal against this part of the orders of the learned single judge, it is stated, is pending before this court.12. after the withdrawn of the earlier notices, the defendant issued two fresh notices on 28-6- ..... be terminated and action for the eviction of eicher farm machinery ltd.', shall be initiated under the himachal pradesh public premises and land (eviction and rent recovery) act. 1971. the 'eicher tractors limited' replied to the notices through their advocate and maintained that the defend-ant board is not entitled to any unearned increase and ..... industrial area. ii. parwanoo.2. facts necessary for the disposal of this petition may be noticed :plaintiff/applicant 'eicher limited' is a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 with a registered office at new delhi. the plaintiff is the successor company of eicher tractors limited. according to the plaintiff, eicher tractors ltd. amalgamated with ..... [18] => ..... was passed by him.2. it is the first contention raised by the petitioner which is more important because it touches the question of jurisdiction of the learned special judge to act under section 457 of the cr.p.c. on this point the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner was that section 457 can be invoked only when ..... in this chapter contemplates the order for custody and disposal of property pending the trial and says that when any property is produced before any criminal court during any inquiry or trial, the court may make such orders as it thinks fit for proper custody of such property pending the conclusion of the trial. thus section 451 contemplates ..... is that if a particular word is statutorily denned in the statute, then that definition should prevail. therefore, when sections 451, 452 and 457 speak of an 'inquiry, they speak of the inquiry which is defined in section 2 (g) of the code. there is nothing in context in which this expression is used in sections 451, 452 and 457 ..... [19] => ..... was held to be ultra vires.5. on june 17, 1968, the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) amendment ordinance no. 5 1968 was promulgated. it was replaced by the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) amendment act, 1968, which came into force on august 16, 1968. the principal act was amended by the insertion of section 10-e, which ..... of the first respondent reference has also been made to jairam singh v. state of uttar pradesh : air1962all350 . it may be pointed out that the learned judge of the allahabad high court based his decision on the observation that the governor of uttar pradesh did not express in clear terms that the ordinance in question ..... officer to dispose of the remaining questions on their merits.24. the writ petition is allowed. the order dated november 10, 197,0 passed by the district judge. simla as appellate officer is quashed. it will be open to the appellate officer to dispose of the appeal afresh. the appellant is entitled to its costs ..... ) Judges Inquiry Act 1968 Section 5 Powers of Committee - Court Himachal Pradesh - Page 6 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Court: himachal pradesh Page 6 of about 648 results (1.229 seconds)

Sep 28 2005 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gurbax Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : III(2006)ACC411,2007ACJ21

..... as well as the amended provisions of the act which came into effect from 14.11.1994 in a number of cases. the law with regard to the liability of the insurance company in respect of passengers being carried in a goods vehicle is now settled. a three-judge bench of apex court in new india assurance co. ..... ltd. v. asha rani : air2003sc607 , considered the question whether it is compulsory for the insurance company to cover the liability in respect of passengers travelling in a goods vehicle. this decision was in context of the unamended act. the apex court overruled ..... of goods or his representative dies or suffers any bodily injury.7. justice s.b. sinha in his concurring judgment held as follows:(25) section 147 of 1988 act, inter alia, prescribes compulsory coverage against death of or bodily injury to any passenger of a 'public service vehicle'. proviso appended thereto categorically states that compulsory coverage .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 13 2005 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sheela Devi and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007ACJ484

..... 2a. its reading shows that the policy did not cover the risk of passengers except employees not exceeding six in number, coming under the purview of the workmen's compensation act, 1923.9. in view of the above discussed position, it is held that there was no contract of insurance between the insured, i.e., respondent sanjay kumar, ..... .4.1994, that is to say, prior to the amendment of section 147 of the motor vehicles act by motor vehicles (amendment) act, 1994.7. a three-judge bench of the hon'ble apex court, while interpreting section 147 of the motor vehicles act, as it stood prior to the amendment of 1994, has held that the provision did not require ..... result of which some persons on board the truck as passengers, died and some other sustained injuries. the claim petitions were filed, under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, seeking award of compensation. the appellant, who was impleaded as respondent on account of its being the insurer of the truck, took the plea that the persons who .....

Tag this Judgment!
Aug 30 1999 (HC)

Shivalik Steel and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Workmen's Compensation Commiss ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : I(2000)ACC365,2000ACJ944,[2000(86)FLR406],(2000)ILLJ1456HP

..... intention of the parliament to the contrary. section 53, as it is in force, presently, has been enacted by way of substitution by the central act 44 of 1966 with effect from january 28, 1968, for the then existing section. a careful perusal of the previous section 53, as it existed prior to its substitution, would disclose that it not ..... high court of bombay by means of a writ petition, which was dismissed by the learned single judge summarily on the ground that the management had an alternative remedy by way of an appeal under section 30 of the workmen's compensation act. the management then preferred an appeal. the division bench held that in view of the bar ..... and not to the case where the claimants came to the forum under the workmen's compensation act without availing or claiming any benefit under the employees' state insurance act.9. the decision in 1987 acj 983 (supra) of the learned single judge of the madhya pradesh high court in our view will be of no relevance when the question .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 23 1989 (HC)

Leela Devi and anr. Vs. Ram Lal Rahu and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1990ACJ431

..... 2 was solely responsible.8. mr. k.s. pathania refers to re. davis v. kesto routh air 1968 calcutta 129, wherein the learned judges, after referring to certain english decisions, observed as under:.the principle underlying all these cases is that an act which is reasonable or necessary, having regard to all the circumstances, though not one which is part of ..... physically, which is receiving of an injury by a workman during the course of employment and within the meaning of section 3 of the act.10. in shantaben v. new raipur mills co. ltd. 1968 acj 417 (gujarat), it has been observed as follows:.we are of the view that a pre-existing disease or infirmity would not by ..... climbing three storeys; the question was whether the death of the deceased could be said as one arising out of and in the course of employment? the learned judge answered the same by saying that the deceased died in the course of employment but there was no causal connection between heart failure and employment nor could it be .....

Tag this Judgment!
Aug 18 2003 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Soma Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : I(2004)ACC162,2003ACJ1919

..... remedy for him? is he to surrender to the product of the fraud and thereby become a conduit to enrich the imposter unjustly? the learned single judge who indicated some other alternative remedy did not unfortunately spell out what is the other remedy which the appellant insurance company could pursue with.finally, it was ..... the aforesaid judgment before the supreme court, even though related to the extent of the right of appeal available to an insurer under section 173 of the act, and the corresponding limitations upon the insurer not being able to extend this right, or enlarge its scope in view of the restricted and specified defences ..... of approval whether the award is perverse, absurd, ridiculously low or abnormally excessive. this can never be the intention of any legislation including provisions of motor vehicles act, even when defences of the petitioner are limited. he further submitted that tribunal being subordinate to this court, even in an appropriate case where otherwise it .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jul 03 1996 (HC)

Oriental Fire and Genl. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Sharda Vig and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1997ACJ1002

..... (2) of section 95 of the act. for coming to this conclusion the learned judges had followed law laid down in pushpabai purshottam udeshi v. ranjit ginning and pressing co. 1977 acj 343 (sc), where it was held that the ..... in the vehicle. interpreting this provision in national insurance co. ltd. v. jugal kishore 1988 acj 270 (sc), learned judges of the supreme court held that notwithstanding the limits provided in sub-section (2) of section 95 of the act, it was open to the insurer to take policy covering higher risk than contemplated by clause (a) of sub-section ..... insurer can always take policies covering risks which are not required to be covered under section 95 of the act. it was observed that in case .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jan 01 1996 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Roop Lal Gupta and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1997ACJ1180

..... which was false in some material particular.8. to this general rule, exception is contained in section 170 of motor vehicles act, 1988, which is also reproduced herein below:170. impleading insurer in certain cases.-where in the course of any inquiry, the claims tribunal is satisfied that-(a) there is collusion between the person making the claim and the person against ..... . magikhia das 1976 acj 239 (orissa); new india assurance co. ltd. v. shiv kumar 1978 acj 137 (mp) and ramesh chandra v. randhir singh 1978 acj 252 (allahabad)]. learned single judge of this court in para 12 of oriental fire & genljns. co. ltd. v. mast ram 1989 acj 1120 (hp), held that:12. now, coming to the issue of compensation, although .....

Tag this Judgment!
May 10 2005 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Seema Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC39,2006ACJ1357,[2006(108)FLR467]

..... life. public authorities or persons who have committed no wrong, cannot be compelled to pay compensation to legal heirs-claimants of such reckless and adventurous persons.16. a single judge of orissa high court in divisional manager, national insurance co. ltd. v. rabi sahoo 2001 acj 538 (orissa), was concerned with a case where the driver did not ..... its liability, it is not open to this court to accept the plea of the insurance company by a process of judicial interpretation of the provisions of the motor vehicles act.15. a division bench of madhya pradesh high court in chhote khan v. rajesh kumar agrawal : (1999)iillj181mp , took a different view and held as follows:(2) ..... relationship. the award made is not to the 'driver' of the vehicle but to the worker of the employer as defined under section 2(1)(n) of the act. that apart, all that the relevant clause in the insurance policy requires is that the person driving the vehicle should have a valid driving licence. that the deceased admittedly .....

Tag this Judgment!
Oct 23 2008 (HC)

Mandeep Guleria Vs. Prithi Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)ShimLC203

..... in the motor accidents:before dealing with that question, it will beneficial for us to keep in mind the principles governing determination of a just compensation contemplated under the act. it is trite, bodily injury is to be treated as a deprivation, which entitles a claimant to damages. the amount of damages vary according to gravity of the ..... is entitled to compensation for disability suffered in the accident. his lordship has held as under:whenever, in a petition filed under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988, it comes out as an admitted fact that a person has suffered permanent disability on account of an injury caused to him by or through an accident ..... so drive a transport vehicle (other than a motorcab or motor cycle hired for his own use or rented under any scheme made under section 75(2) of the act) unless his driving licence specifically entitled him-so to do. section 2(47) defines transport vehicle to mean a public service vehicle, a goods carriage, an education .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jan 06 2010 (HC)

Sh. Jagdish Chand Sharma Vs. Sh. Bachan Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... to be third parties. it is, therefore, obvious that the apex court has not upheld the view expressed by certain courts including the view expressed by a learned single judge in noor dass' case supra that other than the insurer and insured, all other persons are third parties. therefore, this plea of the claimants cannot be accepted. it ..... return of the petition on the ground that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the same. against this order, a revision petition was filed wherein a learned single judge of this court held as follows:the petitioner has filed a petition claiming compensation on account of loss of consignment of apple boxes. these boxes were loaded in ..... it was clearly held that the consignor is not a third party and the claim petition under the act is not maintainable.24. in mayuddin abbasmiya malik v. shanabhai shankerbhai valand and anr. : 1992 (2), acj 881, a learned single judge of the gujarat high court held that the insurance company cannot be held liable in view of the .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //