Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-27-1960
Reported in : [1960]11STC850(AP)
..... him. the learned magistrate believed the evidence of the prosecution and arrived at conclusions which resulted in convictons as already referred to above. the learned sessions judge agreed with the version of the learned magistrate substantially on all the relevant points.6. the prosecution evidence clearly proved beyond doubt or dispute that the ..... not be culpable. therein, it was observed as follows :-the learned assistant public prosecutor conceded that under section 14(2) of the madras general sales tax act, the assistant commercial tax officer was only empowered to inspect ' the accounts and registers maintained by dealers like the petitioner in the ordinary course of their business ..... registers and other documents of the dealer' in section 28(3) mean is clear from section 28(1) and (2). section 28(1) of the act reads :-any officer authorised by the state government in this behalf may...require any dealer to produce before him the accounts, registers and other documents...relating to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-07-1960
Reported in : (1960)IILLJ477AP
..... however, that such notice shall not be necessary where the services of such person are dispensed with on a charge of misconduct supported by satisfactory evidence recorded at an inquiry held for the purpose.(2) the person employed shall have a right to appeal to such authority and within such time as may be prescribed either on the ..... if i may say so with respect, set out the correct position in law of an order made under section 41(2). there are several other recent decisions of single judges of the madras high court. vide balasundara mudaliar v. ellappa mudaliar (1957) i m.l.j. 7 dhandapani v. salem co-operative wholesale stores 1959 i l. ..... from 7 august 1952 as per ex. a. 2. the appellant, thereafter appealed to the appellate authority under section 41(2) of the madras shops and establishments act (madras act xxxvi of 1947) against this order of retrenchment. the labour commissioner, madras, heard both the parties and set aside the order of the retrenchment passed against the appellant .....
Tag this Judgment!