Court : Supreme Court of India
1 2024 INSC511REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.O F2024]. [@ DIARY NO.20674 OF2017 MD. RAHIM ALI @ ABDUR RAHIM APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. RESPONDENTS RESPONDENT No.PARTICULARS1The State of Assam 2 Union of India represented by Secretary, Home Affairs 3 Superintendent of Police, Nalbari 2 JUDGMENT AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.I.A. No.58315 of 2017 [Condonation of Delay]. is allowed, keeping in mind the peculiar facts and circumstances herein. I.A. No.58325 of 2017 [Exemption from filing Certified Copy of the Impugned Judgment]., being formal in nature, is also allowed.2. Leave granted.3. The present appeal arises out of the Final Judgment and Order passed by a Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court at Guwahati (hereinafter referred to as the High Court) in Writ Petition (Civil) No.2668 of 2012 dated 23.11.2015 (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Judgment) by which the Writ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC506REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2842 OF2024[ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) No.1614 OF2024 MOHD. ABDUL SAMAD APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal challenges the Order dated 13.12.2023 passed in Criminal Petition No.12222 of 2023 moved Criminal Appeal No.2842 of 2024 Page 1 of 43 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as CrPC1973), whereby the High Court of Telangana modified the Order dated 09.06.2023 passed by the Family Court in M.C No.171 of 2019. By virtue of disposing of the said petition, the High Court decreased the quantum of interim maintenance payable by the Appellant herein from INR20000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) per month to INR10000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) per month.3. As per the Appellant, the brief facts leading to the instant appeal are that th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC487REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1635 OF2018RATNU YADAV APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH RESPONDENT JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.1. The Sessions Court convicted the appellant-accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, IPC) for committing the murder of Smt Hemwati Bai, who was his stepmother. Appellant was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellant. FACTUAL ASPECT2 The case of the prosecution in brief is that the appellant had a land dispute with the deceased. The allegation against Criminal Appeal No.1635 of 2018 Page 1 of 10 the appellant is that on 2nd March 2013, he assaulted the deceased. After that, he caught hold of the deceased by her hair and dragged her up to the village pond. The appellant put her head inside the pond water. The deceased was suffocated to death. The...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC437[NON-REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO (S). 348 OF2021PRITI AGARWALLA AND OTHERS APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT S.V.N. BHATTI, J.I. FACTUAL MATRIX1 The Olympic Riding and Equestrian Academy, Eastern Jaunapur, New Delhi (for short, OREA), is a training facility for enthusiastic equestrian athletes. Mr. Kapil Nath Modi administers and runs the said training facility. Appellant Nos. 2, 3, 6 and Respondent No.2 were the trainee athletes in OREA. Appellant No.1 is the mother of Appellant No.2. Appellant Nos. 4 and 5 are the parents of Appellant No.6.2. Appellant No.2 was admitted for equestrian training into the Academy in June 2010. Appellant No.3 was accepted into OREA in the 1 year 2009. Appellant No.6 has also been receiving training in the Academy for a little over two years. Respondent No.2, a passionate athlete who dreamt of being the first Olympic champion of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC448REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3924 OF2023SUNITA DEVI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 3926-3927 OF2023CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3925 OF2023JUDGMENT M. M. Sundresh, J.1. Criminal Appeal No.3924 of 2023 has been filed by the informant, against the order of remittal passed by the Division Bench of the Patna High Court directing the Trial Court to conduct a de novo trial, while making certain observations against the Special Judge, disapproving his approach in the conduct of the trial. Criminal Appeal Nos.3926-3927 of 2023 have been filed by the learned Special Judge who conducted the trial and thereafter 1 delivered the judgment. Criminal Appeal No.3925 of 2023 has been filed by the very same learned Judge, aggrieved over the remarks once again made by the High Court in an order of remittal, requesting the Honble Chief Justice of the Patna High Court to consider whethe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC455IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No._____/2024 [ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO .. DIARY NO(s) 17623/2021]. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS M/S BSK REALTORS LLP & ANR. RESPONDENTS With C.A. No./2024 @ SLP(C) No..../2024 @ SLP(C) D.No.32072/2022, C.A. No./2024 @ SLP(C) No..../2024 @ SLP(C) D.No.18130/2021, C.A. No./2024 @ SLP(C) No..../2024 @ SLP(C) D.No.19132/2021, C.A. No./2024 @ SLP(C) No..../2024 @ SLP(C) D.No.10132/2022, C.A. No./2024 @ SLP(C) No..../2024 @ SLP(C) D.No.15707/2022, C.A. No./2024 @ SLP(C) No..../2024 @ SLP(C) D.No.15710/2022, C.A. No./2024 @ SLP(C) No.19012/2022, C.A. No./2024 @ SLP(C) No..../2024 @ SLP(C) D.No.25834/2022, C.A. No./2024 @ SLP(C) No..../2024 @ SLP(C) D.No.32629/2022, Page 1 of 57 M.A. No.277/2023 in C.A. No.8492/2016, M.A. . D.No.39901/2022, M.A. No.278/2023, M.A. . D.No.674/2023, M.A. . D.No.3577/2023, M.A. No.346/2023, M.A. . D.No.5711/2023, C.A. No.542/2016, C.A. No./2024...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC454REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No.414 OF2023IN CIVIL APPEAL No.11857/2016 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ANOTHER APPLICANTS VERSUS M/S. K.L. RATHI STEELS LIMITED AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS WITH MA No.808/2023 in C.A. No.12239/2016 R.P.(C) No.882/2017 in C.A. No.11846/2016 MA No.159/2018 in C.A. No.11857/2016 R.P.(C) No.396/2023 in C.A. No.11857/2016 R.P.(C) No.409/2023 in C.A. No.8511/2016 R.P.(C) No.410/2023 in C.A. No.8925/2016 R.P.(C) No.412/2023 in C.A. No.12114/2016 Page 1 of 90 R.P.(C) No.414/2023 in C.A. No.8898/2016 R.P.(C) No.416/2023 in C.A. No.4599/2016 R.P.(C) No.419/2023 in C.A. No.10206/2016 R.P.(C) No.418/2023 in C.A. No.8505/2016 R.P.(C) No.425/2023 in C.A. No.8929/2016 R.P.(C) No.428/2023 in C.A. No.8545/2016 R.P.(C) No.1731/2023 in C.A. No.9598/2016 R.P.(C) No.429/2023 in C.A. No.11256/2016 R.P.(C) No.431/2023 in C.A. No.9597/2016 R.P.(C) No.432/2023 i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC425IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO (S) . OF2024(arising out of Special Leave Petition(C) No(s).23441-23444 of 2022) MR. R.S. MADIREDDY . APPELLANT(S) AND ANR. ETC. VERSUS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. . RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No(s). 12221 of 2023) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No(s). 22777 of 2023) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present appeals are filed challenging the common impugned judgment and order dated 20th September, 2022 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay thereby 1 dismissing four writ petitions instituted by the appellants being the former employees of respondent No.3 i.e. Air India Limited(hereinafter referred to as AIL) as members of its cabin crew force. Appellants came to be employed in AIL in the late 1980s and all of them retired between 2016 and 2018.3. Writ Petition Nos. 123...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2024 INSC430IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5539 OF2012SMT. SHYAMO DEVI AND OTHERS APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Aravind Kumar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 19.01.2010 passed in Writ Petition No.1995 of 2010 by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellants herein (hereinafter referred to as writ petitioners or petitioners) challenging the order dated 23.09.2009 passed in Revision No.68 of 2008-09 came to be dismissed and said order came to be upheld for the reason that the revision 1 petition is not maintainable and consequently the order dated 07.02.2008 passed by the Additional Collector holding that proceedings for cancellation of the patta could be started at any time came to be upheld.2. By our order dated 13.03.2024, we had made it clear that since none had appeared on behalf of the appellants (wr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable 2024 INSC421IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2567 OF2024State of Himachal Pradesh Appellant versus Raghubir Singh & Ors. Respondents with CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2568 OF2024JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 The respondents in Criminal Appeal No.2567 of 2024 have been convicted by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla by the impugned judgment and order dated 2nd March 2017 for the offence punishable under clause (g) of sub-section (2) of Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, the IPC). They were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- each. They were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months on default of payment of fine. The fine amount, if deposited, was ordered to be paid to the prosecutrix.2. PW-5 is the prosecutrix. The alleged incident is of 8th July 1989. Initially, the accused were prosecuted for the offences punishable un...
Tag this Judgment!