Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1995SC1811; [1995]84CompCas168(SC); (1996)2GLR83; JT1995(4)SC366; 1995(3)SCALE627; (1995)5SCC482; [1995]Supp1SCR349; 1995(2)LC442(SC)
K. Ramaswamy, J.1. Leave granted. Delay condoned.2. The appeal and cross appeal arise from the Division Bench judgment of Gujarat High Court dated January 31, 1994 in Spl. Civil Application No. 2614 of 1980. On August 25, 1980 one Prof. Manubhai Shah Executive Trustee of Respondent No. 1 and Mr. D.N. Dalai sought policies under Table Mi. Similarly in December, 1978 Respondent Nos. 2, to 4 sought similar policies for convertible term insurance plans for different amounts. In September, 1980 Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 agents of the appellants when presented proposals to the LIC under Table 58 on behalf of individual respondents and promised to cover under Table 58 other 9 crores uninsured households, the LIC turned them down. Consequently, after issuance of a notice through counsel on September 14, 1980, the respondents filed the above writ petition. The conditions imposed and denial to accept policies sought under Table 58 were assailed as arbitrary, discriminatory violating Articles 14, 1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 148(2008)DLT170; 2008(101)DRJ582
Reva Khetrapal, J.1. By this appeal filed under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of organized Crimes Act, 1999 (for short the MCOCA), the appellant seeks to assail the order on charge dated 12th October, 2006 and the charge dated 3-11-2006 whereby the learned Special Judge, MCOCA, New Delhi has charged the appellant under Sections 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (for short the ITP Act), Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(4), 3(5) and Section 4 of the MCOCA and Section 420 read with Section 120B of the IPC in FIR No. 96/2005, Police Station Chanakya Puri.2. The brief facts as they emerge from the record are that on 19th April, 2005, SI Sajjan Singh, on receipt of information that the appellant Kamaljeet Singh and his associate Pappi supply girls for prostitution in Five Star Hotels and carry on their business through mobile No. 9810645454 9810645454 , passed on the said information to ACP Kumar Gyanesh, who directed SI Sajjan Singh to strike a deal on the above mobile numbe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1882)ILR5Mad76
Charles A. Turner, Kt., C.J.1. Doubts having been felt whether mortgagees in possession of agricultural estates enjoy the privileges and are subject to the obligations of landlords under the Rent Recovery Act, the cases before us were referred to a Full Bench for decision.2. A review of the legislation respecting landlords and tenants of agricultural holdings discloses the anxiety of the Government to protect tenants from uncertain demands and at the same time a recognized necessity, in the interests of the public revenue, to entrust landlords with certain summary powers and processes for the realization of their dues. It also shows that the privilege to employ these summary powers and processes was restricted to such landlords as had fulfilled their statutory obligations, that certain landlords were debarred from suit if such obligations were not fulfilled, and that precautions were taken to secure to tenants injured by the exercise of summary powers prompt relief, and the responsibil...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : AIR1926Mad390; 92Ind.Cas.805; (1926)50MLJ125
Venkatasubba Rao, J.1. These three appeals have been filed against the judgment of Krishnan, J. Defendants Nos. 2 and 3 are the executants of the promissory notes in question. In some notes they described themselves as the guardians of the first defendant, in others as executors under his father's Will. The first defendant was and continues to be a minor. The second and third defendants are respectively the maternal uncle and the brother-in-law of the first defendant. The plaintiffs in these suits asked for a decree against the first defendant to the extent of the assets of his father's estate and against defendants Nos. 2 and 3 personally. It is not necessary to say what the decision of the Trial Court was but the Subordinate Judge dismissed the suits against defendants Nos. 2 and 3 and passed decrees against the first defendant to the extent of the assets of his father. The plaintiffs preferred second Appeals to the High Court and Krishnan, J., in all the three suits passed decrees a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Privy Council
Lord Blanesburgh: The question at issue on this appeal is whether the respondent has shown a title in himself to the entirety of certain leasehold properties in Hong Kong, freed and discharged from a legal mortgage upon an undivided moiety thereof held by the appellant from Li Nga Ching, the second son of the respondent. In the Courts of Hong Kong, the respondent has established his claim. The appellant's title as mortgagee has, following deliverances of great elaboration, been set aside, and he has been ordered to reassign to the respondent freed from his mortgage the undivided moiety in question. The order to that effect made on 8th April 1930 by the Supreme Court of Hong Kong in its original jurisdiction was, on appeal, affirmed in the Full Court by its judgment of 28th August 1930. This is the mortgagee's appeal therefrom. The respondent is a Chinaman of position resident in Hong Kong. His dispute with the appellant concerns an undivided moiety of one of three separate parcels of l...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
N.M. Jamdar, J. 1. These petitions arise from the proceedings undertaken for validation of Caste Certificates. The two points that we have framed for our consideration are common in all these petitions and thus, these petitions are grouped together and are disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The two points that arise for consideration are: A) Whether the composition of the Scrutiny Committees constituted by the State of Maharashtra by Government Notification dated 30.07.2011 for verification of caste certificates, is in consonance with the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of MadhuriPatil (I), 1994 (6) SCC 241 and Madhuri Patil (II), 1997 (5) SCC 437 and what is the legal status of the validity certificates granted by these Committees. B) Whether it is mandatory for the Scrutiny Committees to call for a field inquiry report from the Vigilance Cell constituted under the provisions of the Act and Rules, before granting validity certificates to the candidates and what is the lega...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by the consent of the parties and heard finally. 2. The petitioner/employee is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 22-12-2011 delivered by the School Tribunal whereby his Appeal No. 57 of 2002 has been dismissed. 3. The said Appeal was earlier dismissed by judgment and order dated 14-10-2010 which was quashed and set aside by this Court by its order dated 06-04-2011 passed in Writ Petition No. 11668 of 2010. The appeal was restored on 28-04-2011 and was reheard. 4. The contentions of the petitioner in the light of the memo of admitted facts dated 28-01-2015 and oral submissions are summarised as under :- a) The petitioner has acquired the degree of Master of Arts and Bachelor of Education (M.A.B.Ed.) b) He was appointed on 15-07-1991 as a secondary school teacher. c) The petitioner and the respondent-management are covered by the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 (here-in-after referred to...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI WRIT PETITION No.102268/2015 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: Nagayya, S/o. Chandrashekhar Kadadevar Age:32. years, Occ: Police Sub-Inspector R/o. Rannebennur Rural Police Station Rannebennur. Petitioner (By Sriyuths K. L. Patil & S. S. Beturmath, Advocates) AND:1. The State of Karnataka Through Secretary, Home Department Vidhan Soudha, Bangalore.2. The Karnataka Human Rights Commission Rep. by Secretary M. S. Building, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Road Bangalore 560 001 3. M. Sandeep Muniswamy Age: Major, Occ: Not Known R/o. No.14, Daneshwar Nagar - 2 - Gopanakoppa Near St. Johns Polytechnic Hubli. (By Sri M. Kumar, AGA for R1; Sri H. R. Kambiyavar, Advocate for R2; Sri Jhankumar Kalangi, Advocate for R3) --- ... Respondents This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution Of India praying to quash the impugned order dated 27.01.2014 passed in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7095 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.5236 OF2022 AISHAT SHIFA .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.120 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.7075 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.15405 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.6957 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.9217 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7078-7083 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NOS. 15407-15412 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.7077 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.15419 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.7074 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.15403 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.7076 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.15418 OF2022 1 CIVIL APPEAL No.7072 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.11396 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.6934 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.7794 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.7084 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.15402 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.7085 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.15416 OF2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL203
1. By this petition, under Section 121 of the Electricity Act, 2003, (for short 'the Act') the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: a. Order and direct the Appropriate Commissions to ensure that all generating companies and licensees abide by the provisions of the Act in so far as they relate to sale and purchase of electricity at regulated tariffs. b. Order and direct the Appropriate Commissions to fix the trading margins for trading licensees. c. Order and direct the Appropriate Commissions to review trading operations/ sales undertaken by generating companies and licensees within their jurisdiction and, where necessary, initiate proceedings for recovery of excess amounts charged by the generating companies and/ or licensees. d. Pass such other or further order(s) and/or direction(s) as may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.2. It is averred in the petition that the petitioner has no personal interest in the present petition except as a consume...
Tag this Judgment!