1
Court : Himachal Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-28-1978
Reported in : AIR1979HP35
T.U. Mehta, C.J.1. In this writ application show cause notice was issued to the respondents and reply has been filed; the rejoinder has also been filed. The petitioners are the residents of Tehsil Kursog situated in Mandi District of this State. They previously belonged to Chanyana Gram Sabha which was constituted in the year 1972. This Sabha consisted of 12 villages. The petitioners, however, wanted a separate Sabha for 7 of these 12 villages. These seven villages for which they wanted a separate Sabha are Sheglinal, Badyog, D. P. F. Alyas, Kalangar, Khadkan, Kot and Sawindhar. It appears that they could persuade the Government to bifurcate the Chanyana Gram Sabha into two and to establish a separate Sabha for the above referred seven villages known as Sawindhar Gram Sabha. The remaining five villages were to form Chanayana Gram Sabha. The Government accordingly issued notification dated 11th May, 1978 as found at Annexure P-14. By this notification the original Chanyana Gram Sabha wa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Himachal Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-05-1978
Reported in : 1979CriLJ216
ORDERT.U. Mehta, J.1. This revision application is filed against the order passed by the learned Special Judge, District Sirmur at Nahan in Cr. M. P. No. 18-N/4 of 1977 on 7-12-1977 with regard to the disposal of the case property under Section 457 Cr.P.C. The case of the prosecution is that the present petitioner, who is accused of the offences under Sections 379/420/467/ 468/120-B, I.P.C. read with Section 8 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, has felled some trees belonging to the Government and, therefore, certain pieces of timber which the petitioner has obtained from these felled trees are stolen property, It is found that the police, during the investigation, has seized this property, and thereafter on 9-11-1977, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, C.I.D. (Crime), Himachal Pradesh, Simla made an application to the learned Special Judge for auction of this property as contemplated by Section 457 of the Cr.P.C. The respondent in reply to this petition submitted that he had f...
Tag this Judgment!