Court : Himachal Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-10-1964
Reported in : AIR1965HP25,1965CriLJ550
ORDEROm Parkash, J.C.1. The facts, giving rise to this petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, are as under :2. Shri Het Ram, respondent No. 5, Sarpanch, Nyaya Panchayat, Himri, Sub-Tehsil Kotkhai and other Panches, constituting Bench No. 1 of the Nyaya Panchayat, had gone to village Rewag for demarcating the land of Shri Moti Ram. The land of the petitioners adjoined the land of Shri Moti Ram. The petitioners were alleged to have interrupted the proceedings, relating to the demarcation of land and also to have Insulted the members of Bench No. 1. Shri Het Ram, Sarpanch, filed a complaint under Section 228 I. P. C., against the petitioners, In the Nyaya Panchayat, about the alleged contempt. He also issued notices to the petitioners and constituted Bench No. 3, of the Nyaya Panchayat, consisting of respondents Nos. 2 to 4, for the trial of the complaint. The petitionerswere proceeded against ex parte as they did not appear despite service of summonses. The co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Himachal Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-05-1964
Reported in : AIR1965HP49,1965CriLJ499
Om Parkash, J.C.1. Two brothers, Rai Singh, appellant, in Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 1983 and Gunia, appellant, in Criminal Appeal No. SO of 1963, were convicted and sentenced, under section 304, Part II, I. P. C., read with section 34, I. P. C., by the learned Sessions Judge, Sirmur, for causing the death of Mohta. The prosecution case against the appellants was as follows :2. The fields of the appellants adjoined thefields of Mohta; the fields of the appellant, being onthe upper side, and those of Mohta, being on thelower side. On the 30th August, 1962, Mohta wasdigging his field, known as That, just below the boundary line of the field of the appellants. Budhi Singh P. W. 2 and his sister, Smt. Bare, grandson and grand-daughter of Mohta, were hoeing the mash crop, growing in That field. At about 5-30 P. M., the appellants called out to Mohta, from a place known as Dangi-ki-Pand as to why he was digging their field. Mohta had replied that he was not digging the field of the appellant ...
Tag this Judgment!