Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: joss paper Sorted by: old Court: chennai Page 1 of about 247 results (0.023 seconds)

Sep 18 1917 (PC)

Govindasami Pillai Vs. Pethapkrumal Chettt, Dead, and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1918Mad207; 44Ind.Cas.839

..... is entitled to remain in such possession as in cases of delivery under order xxi, rule 96, of the code of civil procedure and should not be confounded with cases where a party is entitled to actual possession, but obtains only what is called a paper delivery, (that is), where he gets no possession at all. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1922 (PC)

Sri Gadicherla Venkatanarasimha Rao Garu Vs. Nyapathy Subba Rao Pantul ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1923Mad376; 73Ind.Cas.991

..... he held 'that the testator having intimated jus wish to devote his property to the establishing an hospital, every subsequent writing of the testator, upon the same half sheet of paper, is to a certain extent a confirmation of the previous charitable bequest. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 1927 (PC)

Ganshamdoss Narayandoss Vs. Gulab Bi Bai

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1927Mad1054; (1927)53MLJ709

william phillips, kt. officiating c.j.1. the question referred to us is : can a defendant resisting a claim made by the plaintiff as heir-at-law rely in defence on a will executed in his favour at madras in respect of property situate in madras when the will is not probated and no letters of administration with the will annexed have been granted?2. this question deals with the provisions of section 187 of the indian succession act, x of 1865, which is to the effect that no right as legatee can be proved by a will of which probate has not been taken. it has been held by this court in caralapathi chunna cunniah v. cota nannnalwariah ilr (1909) m 91 that this objecttion to proving by an unprobated will applies only to a plaintiff and it was held 'that a defendant is not precluded by that section from relying upon a will as he is not seeking to establish a right as executor or legatee.' janaki v. dhanu lall ilr (1891) m 454 was cited as authority for that proposition. on a reference to janaki v. dhanu lall ilr (1891) m 454, with all respect, it seems very doubtful whether any such proposition is there put forward. in that case the 1st defendant had obtained a decree against the personal representatives of the deceased man who was said to have left a will, and subsequently the deceased's mother, who would have been his representative in the absence of a will, brought a suit to set aside that decree., it was then held that, 'though the executors can establish no right without .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 1945 (PC)

In Re: T.S. Chockalingam

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1945)2MLJ295

..... this is not the only paper that committed this error. ..... other papers have also published similarly taking a week to be six days. ..... the appellant is the editor, printer and publisher of the vernacular daily paper 'dinasari. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1983 (HC)

Bakul Cashew Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1984(2)ECC289; 1985LC207(Madras)

..... the firm submitted the necessary papers for clearance with the customs authorities. ..... cassava starch is used for food and also in the manufacture of adhesives and cosmetics and in-sizing textiles, laundering and paper making. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1983 (HC)

Bakul Cashew Company Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1984(15)ELT379(Mad)

..... the firm submitted the necessary papers for clearance with the customs authorities. ..... cassava starch is used for food and also in the manufacture of adhesives and cosmetics and in sizing textiles, laundering and paper making. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1990 (HC)

State Bank's Staff Union (Madras Circle) Vs. the State Bank of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1991)ILLJ163Mad; (1992)IMLJ131

..... one may say 'i do not like the colour or thickness of the paper in which the settlement is incorporated and hence i would not respect it'. ..... if you do not do so, we are not going to print your paper'. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1990 (HC)

State Bank's Staff Union Vs. State Bank of India and Ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1992)1MLJ131

..... one may say, 'i do not like the colour or thickness of the paper in which the settlement is incorporated and hence i would not respect it. ..... if you do not do so, we are not going to print your paper'. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1994 (HC)

C. Kailaschand JaIn and Two ors. Vs. Mohamed Kasim

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1995(1)CTC47

orderthangamani, j.1. tenants who have lost in both the forums below have come forward with this civil revision petition. present respondent instituted r.c.o.p. no. l0 of 1988 in the court of rent controller (district munsif), mayiladuthurai seeking eviction under sections 10(2)(ii)(b) and 10(2)(iii) of tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act 18 of 1960 on the allegations that the revision petitioners are using the building for a purpose other than that for which it was leased and that they have committed acts of waste as are likely to impair materially the value or utility of the building. it is the case of the landlord that the demised property' is the ground floor measuring 10'x95' of door no. 5, second street, mayiladuthurai town. this non-residential premises was let out to the revision petitioner under ex.p. 1 agreement dated .31-7-1978 for the purpose of running textile shop, jewellery shop and medical shop for a period of 15 years from 1-7-1978 on a monthly rent ranging from rs. 1000/- to rs. 1238/- as specified therein. however, contrary to the terms of the tenancy revision petitioners are running a pawn-broker's shop in the premises without the knowledge and consent of the landlord. besides they have carried out structural alteration in the building in respect of windows, doors, almirahs and angles. they have lowered the floor space below the road level. they have also raised a wall in the verandah thereby putting in a barricade between the verandah .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1994 (HC)

C. Kailashchand JaIn and ors. Vs. Mohamed Kasim

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)1MLJ267

orderthangamani, j.1. tenants who have lost in both the courts below have come forward with this civil revision petition. present respondent instituted r.c.o.p. no. 10 of 1988 in the court of rent controller (district munsif), mayiladuthurai seeking eviction under sections 10(2) (ii) (b) and 10(2)(iii) of tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act 18 of 1960 on the allegations that the revision petitioners are using the building for a purpose other than that for which it was leased and that they have committed acts of waste as are likely to impair materially the value or utility of the building. it is the case of the landlord that the demised property is the ground floor measuring 10' x 95' of door no. 5, second street, mayiladuthurai town. this non-residential premises was let out to the revision petitioners under ex.p-1 agreement dated 31.7.1978 for the purpose of running textile shop, jewellery shop and medical shop for a period of 15 years from 1.7.1978 on a monthly rent ranging from rs. 1,000 to rs. 1,238 as specified therein. however, contrary to the terms of the tenancy revision petitioners are running a pawnbroker's shop in the premises without the knowledge and consent of the landlord. besides they have carried out structural alteration in the building in respect of windows, doors, almirahs and angles. they have lowered the floor space below the road level. they have also raised a wall in the verandah thereby putting in a barricade between the verandah portion .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //