Interview - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interview Court: madhya pradesh Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 22 results (0.015 seconds)Virendra Kumar Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-06-2012
w a no 883 12 writ appeal no 883 of 2012 v i r e n d r a k...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNiraj Kumar Vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-13-2012
..... in the written examination were eligible to be called for interview in the interview 50 marks were prescribed and the candidates were required ..... for fixation of minimum marks in the written examination and interview are ex facie arbitrary and illegal it is further submitted ..... and second paper of the written examination respectively in the interview out of 50 marks a candidate is required to secure .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.P. Public Service Commission Vs. Siya Ram Raghuwanshi
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-16-2012
..... panchayat narsinghpur being aggrieved by the action of the commission in not calling him for interview for the post of taxation assistant in the commercial tax department of madhya pradesh ..... madhya pradesh public service commission seeks review to the extend that the direction for holding interview and passing necessary consequential order is not warranted as in compliance to the interim order .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLal Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-17-2012
high court of madhya pradesh at jabalpur wp 5437 2006 s lal singh versus the state of madhya pradesh wp...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSharda Prasad Kachhi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-07-2012
..... not correct when the petitioners were permitted to participate in the interview which was to be held on 4 7 1998 they have ..... support of his contention that the petitioners were called for interview and as the interviews were not held it is stated that without adverting ..... issuance of call letters to the petitioners to appear in the interview as this could be done only if an application was submitted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjay Nigam and ors. Vs. M.P. State Mining Corp. and ors.
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-12-2012
high court of madhya pradesh jabalpur writ petition no 6657 2000 ajay nigam another versus m p state mining corporation...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCharan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-19-2012
..... is evident from annexures p 2 and p 3 he appeared and participated in the interview but when nothing was done and the result was not declared he has filed this ..... his candidature was permitted to be considered he was called for interview and participated in the selection process and in the interview and selection process which was conducted by the committee constituted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajesh Kalra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-05-2012
..... he would be eligible however as the petitioner was called for interview in the year 2010 treating the petitioner to have completed 35 ..... january 2008 and not with respect to january 2010 when the interview was held and as the respondents have 2 committed an error ..... after assessing the age of the petitioner for participating in the interview in accordance to the age of the petitioner as was determined .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatish Virha Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-19-2012
..... to fill in the backlog vacancies through limited departmental examination comprising of written test and interview was taken recourse to the written test was held on 20 6 1993 under the ..... scheme the candidate to be eligible for interview was required to have 50 minimum in the written test and the select list was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPiratlal Uke Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-05-2012
..... of compassionate appointment and after due processing of the same petitioner was called for an interview vide annexure p 4 dated 12 11 10 petitioner participated in the ..... interview which was held on 18 th november 2010 and 19th november 2010 and it is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT