Court : Delhi
..... under this sub-section shall be bound to comply with such notice, and, in particular, where any such notice is issued to a post office, bank or an insurer, it shall not be necessary for any pass book, deposit receipt, policy or any other document to be produced for the purpose of any entry, endorsement or the ..... an inquiry, after providing adequate opportunity to the alleged debtor before directing him to make any deposit. in the present case, the respondent no.1 has virtually acted on the unsubstantiated dictates of the respondent no.2 and has directed the petitioner to pay the amount even when it had specifically denied holding any amount of the ..... to the petitioner s officers once again requiring them to deposit the said amount or to show cause as to why warrants of arrest be not issued against them.4. aggrieved by the persistent demands and threats of the respondent no.1, the petitioner instituted the present petition impugning the prohibitory orders and the showcause notices. this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... as has been laid down in the judgment duro felguera, s.a. (supra) see paras 48 & 59.11) we, therefore, overrule the judgment in united india insurance company limited (supra) as not having laid down the correct law but dismiss this appeal for the reason given in para 3 above. 7. respondent has not denied the ..... parties, in my view, there is no merit in the objection raised by the respondent in view of the arb.p. 547/2019 page 3 of 4 arbitration and conciliation (amendment) act, 2015 and the judgment of the apex court in m/s mayavati trading pvt. ltd. (supra).9. i hereby appoint mr. pradeep chadha, retired district ..... quazar infrastructure pvt. ltd. .....petitioner through: mr. faiyaz hasan, advocate versus national agriculture corporative marketing federation of india ltd. (society registered under the multi state co-operative societies act) .....respondent through: mrs. gouri k. mohanti and ms. anu gupta, advocates coram: hon'ble ms. justice jyoti singh jyoti singh, j.(oral) 1. this is a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... amount of the loss or damage shall be first obtained." it is also hereby expressly agreed and declared that if the company shall disclaim liability to the insured for any claim herein under, and such claim shall not, within 12 calendar months from the date of such disclaimer have been made the subject matter ..... respondents coram: hon'ble ms. justice jyoti singh jyoti singh, j.(oral) 1. this is a petition filed under section 11(6) of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 ( act ) for appointment of an arbitrator. the arbitration clause between the parties reads as under:"10. arbitration and disclaimer : if any dispute or difference shall arise as to the ..... it is always necessary to ensure that the dispute resolution process does not become unnecessarily protracted. i have examined the pleadings of the parties and heard the 4. learned counsels.5. the only objection raised by the respondent to the appointment of the arbitrator is that the petitioner without any fraud/undue influence/coercion .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ltd vs swaran singh & ors 2004 acj1sc), which is a full bench judgment, hon'ble apex court had noted that chapter xi of the motor vehicles act, 1988 providing compulsory insurance of vehicles against third party risks is a social welfare legislation to extend relief by compensation to victims of accidents caused o by use of motor vehicles. the ..... trainee the requisite skills as well as teach them the basic road signs and rules related to driving of motor vehicles on roads. mac.app. no.777/2016 page 4 of 10 6. nevertheless, at the end of any such training, whenever a candidate appears before the transport authority, his motor driving skills and knowledge of the applicable ..... sai motor driving training school, noida, up and a certificate had been issued in favour of the driver on 23.02.2013. it was valid upto 22.04.2014.4. in this regard, the learned tribunal has observed and reasoned as under: issued certificate 9. respondent no.2 got examined shri ankit tyagi, instructor, om sai motor driving .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of delhi at new delhi reserved on:04. 09.2019 pronounced on:23. 09.2019 ........ petitioner through: mr. ravi shankar nanda & mr. manish verma, advocates. versus tata aig life insurance co. ltd. ..... respondent through: ms. swati sinha & mr. aman bhatnagar, advocates. coram: hon'ble ms. justice jyoti singh jyoti singh, j.1. the present petition has been ..... filed by the petitioner under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 ( the act ) for partially setting aside the award dated 20.11.2014, passed by the arbitral tribunal. the petition seeks to challenge the award to the extent it has ..... partially rejected the claim of the petitioner under issue no.1 as also the claims under issue nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7(f) and 7(g).2. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... purpose she placed reliance on the decision of the supreme court in state of haryana and ors. vs. piara singh and ors. (1992) 4 scc118and of this court in hemant kumar & ors. vs. employees state insurance corporation and ors. w.p.(c) 6891/2019 and anil lamba and ors vs. govt. of nct and ors. [238 (2017) ..... to decide the dispute by dealing with only one of the contentions raised by the petitioners, contravenes the real purpose of this special mechanism provided under the industrial disputes act, 1947. w.p.(c) 7412/2019 & ors. page 6 of 7 8. in these circumstances, the impugned awards cannot be sustained and are accordingly set aside ..... respondent hospital for the period of their engagement between 22.08.2017 to 19.09.2017, the same could not imply that they were employees of the respondent.4. impugning these awards, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had contended before the labour court that notwithstanding their continuous engagement at the respondent hospital .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... purpose she placed reliance on the decision of the supreme court in state of haryana and ors. vs. piara singh and ors. (1992) 4 scc118and of this court in hemant kumar & ors. vs. employees state insurance corporation and ors. w.p.(c) 6891/2019 and anil lamba and ors vs. govt. of nct and ors. [238 (2017) ..... to decide the dispute by dealing with only one of the contentions raised by the petitioners, contravenes the real purpose of this special mechanism provided under the industrial disputes act, 1947. w.p.(c) 7412/2019 & ors. page 6 of 7 8. in these circumstances, the impugned awards cannot be sustained and are accordingly set aside ..... respondent hospital for the period of their engagement between 22.08.2017 to 19.09.2017, the same could not imply that they were employees of the respondent.4. impugning these awards, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had contended before the labour court that notwithstanding their continuous engagement at the respondent hospital .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... purpose she placed reliance on the decision of the supreme court in state of haryana and ors. vs. piara singh and ors. (1992) 4 scc118and of this court in hemant kumar & ors. vs. employees state insurance corporation and ors. w.p.(c) 6891/2019 and anil lamba and ors vs. govt. of nct and ors. [238 (2017) ..... to decide the dispute by dealing with only one of the contentions raised by the petitioners, contravenes the real purpose of this special mechanism provided under the industrial disputes act, 1947. w.p.(c) 7412/2019 & ors. page 6 of 7 8. in these circumstances, the impugned awards cannot be sustained and are accordingly set aside ..... respondent hospital for the period of their engagement between 22.08.2017 to 19.09.2017, the same could not imply that they were employees of the respondent.4. impugning these awards, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had contended before the labour court that notwithstanding their continuous engagement at the respondent hospital .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... purpose she placed reliance on the decision of the supreme court in state of haryana and ors. vs. piara singh and ors. (1992) 4 scc118and of this court in hemant kumar & ors. vs. employees state insurance corporation and ors. w.p.(c) 6891/2019 and anil lamba and ors vs. govt. of nct and ors. [238 (2017) ..... to decide the dispute by dealing with only one of the contentions raised by the petitioners, contravenes the real purpose of this special mechanism provided under the industrial disputes act, 1947. w.p.(c) 7412/2019 & ors. page 6 of 7 8. in these circumstances, the impugned awards cannot be sustained and are accordingly set aside ..... respondent hospital for the period of their engagement between 22.08.2017 to 19.09.2017, the same could not imply that they were employees of the respondent.4. impugning these awards, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had contended before the labour court that notwithstanding their continuous engagement at the respondent hospital .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... purpose she placed reliance on the decision of the supreme court in state of haryana and ors. vs. piara singh and ors. (1992) 4 scc118and of this court in hemant kumar & ors. vs. employees state insurance corporation and ors. w.p.(c) 6891/2019 and anil lamba and ors vs. govt. of nct and ors. [238 (2017) ..... to decide the dispute by dealing with only one of the contentions raised by the petitioners, contravenes the real purpose of this special mechanism provided under the industrial disputes act, 1947. w.p.(c) 7412/2019 & ors. page 6 of 7 8. in these circumstances, the impugned awards cannot be sustained and are accordingly set aside ..... respondent hospital for the period of their engagement between 22.08.2017 to 19.09.2017, the same could not imply that they were employees of the respondent.4. impugning these awards, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had contended before the labour court that notwithstanding their continuous engagement at the respondent hospital .....
Tag this Judgment!