Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: institutes of technology amendment act 2002 section 4 amendment of section 4 Court: kerala Page 1 of about 487 results (0.255 seconds)

Kerala Forest Research Institute represented by its Registrar Vs. DR. ...

Court : Kerala

..... government) directors of two science and technology institutions under the council to be nominated in rotation by the president/government notwithstanding anything contained above, the composition of the first state council shall be as given in the article 4 of the memorandum of association. one more provision in the rules is rule 19 which deals with amendment of memorandum of association and rules ..... different departments as vice president and various high officers of the government including the vice chancellor of cochin university of science and technology and kerala agricultural university are members. the society has been constituted to manage six research institutes which research institutes are engaged in scientific research and development. copy of the rules have been placed before us by the counsel for the .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. A.M. Habeeb

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2004)188CTR(Ker)100; [2004]268ITR344(Ker); 2004(2)KLT202

..... made retrospective the said section has got only prospective operation and has got application only in respect of the assessment proceedings under the it act/wt act commenced after the coming into force of the amendment act. the further contention of the revenue, as already noted, is that the right of appeal conferred under section 260a did not ..... the supreme court in munivenkataramiah's case (supra) the conferring of the right of appeal is not circumscribed by the right being available at the time of the institution of the cause in the court of first instance, the right of appeal in a given situation may even be subsequently conferred and in either situation, without any ..... abhijit tea co. (p) ltd. and ors. (supra) had observed that in some statutes the legislature no doubt says that no suit shall be 'entertained' or 'instituted' in regard to a particular subject-matter; it has been held by the supreme court that such a law will not affect pending actions and the law is only prospective .....

Soman Achari Vs. Sabu Jacob

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT604

orderv.k. bali, c.j.1. the negotiable instruments (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 2002 came into being to amend the negotiable instruments act, 1881, bankers' books evidence act, 1891 and the information technology act, 2000 for a purpose. one of the objects to bong about the new legislation mentioned in the objects and reasons of the act of 2002 was to provide for ..... , a period of fifteen years have already gone by. the parties to the litigation are at initial stage, as the case has not made any progress from the date of institution of the same.2. when the petitioner filed a complaint under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, hereinafter referred to as 'n.i. act', before the chief judicial magistrate .....

Smt.Anandavally M.K. Vs. Dr.P.G.Jairaj

Court : Kerala

..... were in existence as on 01.01.1986. this was applicable to all degree level technical institutions, including engineering and technology faculties/ departments/institutions of the universities falling under the purview of aicte except indian institute of technology for which separate proceedings were under consideration. wa2706/09 & con. cases 26 in order to ..... while extending the financial benefit to the state of kerala, so far as the pay scale of teaching staff in the government technical institutions or colleges, they amended the special rules. later, by introducing rule 6a, certain benefits were created to one class of persons who were appointed prior to ..... 40% for reserved category in the qualifying examination from the academic year 2006-07. consequently, the university regulations in this regard came to be amended resulting in the university fixing a marginally higher eligibility criteria as against the eligibility criteria fixed by the aicte. there was a different eligibility criteria .....

infoparks Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2009)227CTR(Ker)486; [2010]186TAXMAN328(Ker)

..... menon, j.1. whether the refusal on the part of the respondents/departmental authorities to issue exemption certificate under section 197 of the it act ('act' in short) to the petitioners, in view of the amendment brought about by incorporating a 'proviso' to section 2(15) of the act w.e.f. 1st april, 2009 is justified; ..... premature. reliance is also placed on annex. r1(a) circular issued by the cbdt, clarifying the position with regard to the amended section 2(15) holding that where the purpose of trust or institution is the relief of the poor, education or medical relief, it will constitute 'charitable purpose', even if it incidentally involves the ..... retention of the income from such activity.the first limb of exclusion from charitable purpose under clause (a) will be attracted, if the activity pursued by the institution involves any trade, commerce or business. but the situation contemplated under the second limb [clause (b)] stands entirely on a different pedestal, with regard to the .....

Malappuram District Parallel College Association and ors. Vs. Union of ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2005)199CTR(Ker)453; 2006[2]STR321

..... to large number of tax evaders under the guise of charity will continue to protect educational institutions as charity includes education also. if education is run on business lines, then solution is to amend section 11 and other relevant provisions of the it act withdrawing the exemptions to institutions and government can simultaneously provide financial aid to beneficiaries which will put an end to misuse ..... of the government because this malady has to be corrected only by levying income-tax on the institutions and not by licensing the institutions to collect service-tax from students. in fact section 10(22) of the it act which granted blanket income-tax exemption for educational institutions is now deleted and exemption is provided with moderation in section 10(23c) of the said act .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Forbes, Ewart and Figgis Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2003)184CTR(Ker)308; [2004]267ITR153(Ker)

..... under the said clarification. in order to appreciate the communication issued by the department of company affairs it is necessary to see the query which is raised by the institute of chartered accountants. further, it has to be ascertained as to whether the situation in the present case is one falling under the special circumstances and can be treated ..... to create the reserve before the closing of the accounts and drawing of the p&l; a/c, the assessee was entitled to the benefit of section 80hhc of the it act ? 2. whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal is right in law in holding that the assessee had created the requisite reserve ..... of the madras high court in cit v. sri venkatesa mills ltd. : [1999]235itr665(mad) which has taken the view that the p&l; a/c can be amended only till the finalisation of the assessment and thereafter it cannot be made. the counsel also submitted that when the company law under which the company is incorporated permits reopening .....

Nature Lovers' Forum represented by Its President M.R. Gireeshkumar Vs ...

Court : Kerala

..... by legislative flat; they are imposed on us by the natural world. an understanding of the laws of nature must therefore inform all of our social institutions. 25. the public trust doctrine primarily rests on the principle that certain resources like air, sea, waters and the forests have such a great importance ..... imposes constraints on our freedom; these constraints are not the product of value choices but of the scientific imperative of the environment's limitations. reliance on improving technology can delay temporarily, but not forever, the inevitable constraints. "there is a limit to the capacity of the environment to service ... growth, both in ..... wild life.- the state shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country . by the same constitutional amendment part iva (fundamental duties) was also incorporated in the constitution. article 51a(g) provided as follows: 51a. fundamental duties.-.... .......... (g) to protect and .....

National Institute of Technology Multi Purpose Vs. M.K. Gopalan

Court : Kerala

..... honourable mr. justice dama seshadri naidu wednesday, the5h day of august201514th sravana, 1937 wp(c).no. 23413 of 2015 (b) -------------------------------------------- petitioner: the national institute of technology multi purpose co-operative society ltd no.1883 (nit multipurpose co-operative society ltd.) nit post, kozhikode rep. by its honorary secretary. by adv. sri ..... the second respondent has, however, rejected the said petition through exhibit p1 order. in course of time, the petitioner filed, in terms of the amended section 69 of the act, an application before the second respondent for determination of monetary dispute regarding misappropriation of funds alleged to have been committed ..... could not produce the documents despite his best efforts. denial of opportunity, despite the delay in the disposal of the matter, may affect the institutional interest of the petitioner. it meets, i believe, the interest of justice, if the petitioner is given initially two weeks' time to enable it .....

State of Kerala Vs. Panamoottil Investments

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT557

..... be conceded freedom to change its policy and courts should not interfere with the same, the learned advocate general relied on the decisions of the apex court in principal, madhava institute of technology and science v. rajendra singh yadav : (2000) 6 scc 608, javed v. state of haryana 2003 (3) klt sn 59 (c. no. 80) sc : ..... with reconstituted board wants to continue the business in foreign liquor, they should seek the permission of the excise commissioner. such a provision cannot be described as amending the provisions of the partnership act or the indian companies act. the learned senior counsel pointed out that even the retirement of a partner is not permitted. ..... with that objective, the second proviso to rule 19(iv) was introduced. the learned advocate general further submitted that rule 19(ii) does not seek to amend the indian partnership act or the companies act. it only contains a deeming provision that even though the reconstitution of a partnership in certain circumstances may not .....