Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 6 other committees Page 4 of about 243,469 results (0.513 seconds)

Mangesh G. Salodkar Vs. Monsanto Chemicals of India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(2)BomCR883

..... hospitalization expenses. monsanto also records that it paid ex-gratia. monsanto has stated before the court that it has all the requisite statutory permissions including those under the factories act, 1948 and the insecticides act, 1968. no complaint was made by the petitioner to any of the authorities constituted under the governing statutes in india. monsanto states before the court that it holds accreditations ..... licences, apart from other times;(vii) the state government shall consider issuance of directions for the appointment of safety officers in the case of factories involved in hazardous processes under section 40b(1)(ii) irrespective of the size of the factory and the number of workers employed therein;(viii) the operations of the factories' inspectorates must be computerised. modern methods of .....

Krishi Kainder Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1998CriLJ351

..... 1. herein, the prayer is for quashing the complaint dated 2-2-1995 (ann. p.2), under sections 3(k)(1), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act) read with rule 27(5) of the insecticide rules, 1971, as well as all the consequent proceedings arising thereof, now pending in the court of chief ..... the report of the testing laboratory and re-q nested for sending the sample for reanalysis to the central insecticide laboratory. however, without sending the sample for re-analysis to the central insecticide laboratory as provided under section 24(4) of the act the complaint was filed. it is further alleged that the petitioner has been deprived of its valuable right ..... (ann. p.2), dated 2-2-1995, i.e. much after the expiry of the shelf life of the insecticide and in this manner, the petitioner has been deprived of his valuable right under section 24 of the act and on this ground alone the complain i is liable to be quashed.6. on the other hand, the learned .....

Gupta Chemicals (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2002(5)WLC653

..... insecticide act, 1968 (for short 'act'), criminal complaint was filed by the insecticide inspector (respondent no.2) before addl. chief judicial magistrate bhawani mandi on 27.7.1995 against the dealer (from whom the sample of insecticide was taken by the respondent no.2), distributor and manufacturing company so also their directors & managers for violation of sections ..... under section 31 of the act. with due respect. i am of the considered opinion that quashing of criminal proceedings in complaints of menace arising from contamination with insecticides, at the out set, would itself be an abuse of process of law defeating the object of statute i.e. the insecticides act by ..... ), and not by other co-accused atleast the dealer from whose shop the insecticide sample was taken by the inspector (respondent no.2), because under sub section (3) of section 24 of the act the report signed by an insecticide analyst shall be conclusive evidence only against a person from whom the sample had .....

Coromandel Indag Products India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and o ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi167; 95(2002)DLT261; 2002(61)DRJ406

..... interim relief in the writ petition where the primary prayer is to set aside the orders under section 9(4) of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), passed by the registration committee (hereinafter referred to as 'the rc'), constituted under the act, granted in favor of respondent no. 4, i.e., m/s. e.i.d. parry ..... respondent no. 4 in m/s. eid parry (india) ltd., a company regd. under the companies act, 1956. 2. the dispute raised in the writ petition is that when an insecticide is granted registration under section 9(3) of the act after undergoing tests, the same tests have to be followed for a subsequent manufacturer and importer. the case ..... 's products. his plea is that the phrase 'same conditions on which the insecticide was originally registered' in section 9(4) of the act implies that the tests undergone by a section 9(3) registrant have to be emulated in the case of a section 9(4) registrant also. he further submitted that even the comparative tests done .....

Kissan Brothers Faridkot Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2001CriLJ234

..... was acquired or that the container or the seal thereof was found tampered with. inspite of this, the sample was declared misbranded. the petitioner filed an appeal under section 15 of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act). the joint director (plant protection), punjab, chandigarh, vide his order dated 10-5-1999, accepted that the petitioner is entitled to the protection under ..... chief agricultural officer, faridkot, is directed to proceed as per rules under the insecticides act. it appears that on the basis of the aforesaid observations, the present complaint has been filed under sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 read with rule 27(5) of the insecticides rules, 1971.2. in similar circumstances, this court quashed the proceedings in the .....

Biochem Pharmaceutical and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT207; 2005(82)DRJ653

..... can be made.15. it may be stated now that the judgments on insecticides act as well as those on the drugs and cosmetics act will be relevant for the analysis. the insecticides act, 1968 has very similar provisions. both insecticides act and the drugs and cosmetics act require the sample to be divided in portions and one portion to be ..... unless it was the manufacturer of the drug under the drugs and cosmetics act whose name was disclosed under section 18a. both the acts require the report to be controverter within a statutory time without which the report of the government analyst/insecticides analyst would be final. on the basis of these statutory provisions, the ..... of government analysts.- (1) the government analyst to whom a sample of any drug of cosmetic has been submitted for test or analysis under sub-section (4) of section 23, shall deliver to the inspector submitting it a signed report in triplicate in the prescribed form.(2) the inspector on receipt thereof shall deliver one .....

Rhone Poulenc (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1999)(65)ECC144

..... insecticides directed them to register their product under the insecticides act and to comply with the provisions of insecticides act; that appellants in their letter dated 27-11-1975 urged that their product was not an insecticide as per section 38 of ..... : (i) inducing flowering and preventing shedding of buds, flowers and fruits; 3. shri s.n. parikh, ld. advocate, submitted that the impugned product is an insecticide as the same has been specified as insecticide under the schedule to the insecticides act, 1968; that the said schedule was amended on 9-1-1975 and naphthylactic acid and its derivatives was added; that the central board of .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Essen Synthetics (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1987)(14)ECC169

..... his order dated 14-7-1983, inter alia, held that insecticides had the same meaning as defined in section 3 of insecticides act, -1968. the schedule annexed to the insecticides act, 1968 did not include the two products dbp and dmp as insecticides. the respondents did not hold registration under section 9(1) or licence under section 13(1) of the act ibid and for these reasons the two products could not ..... be considered insecticide within the meaning of the notification and merit exemption .....

Jhajhan Lal Gupta, Director and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1997CriLJ190

..... s bansal radio and company, ellenabad, adcalerof the aforesaid insecticide being manufactured by petition no. 2 and purchased samples of the said insecticide having manufacturing date feb. 1989 and expiry date july, 1990, in accordance with the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act). on being analysed the said sample was declared mis- ..... stated the sample was found to be misbranded and as such the complaint cannot be quashed. it has been further stated that the provisions of section 24 of the act have been complied with by the respondent and the complaint cannot be quashed on this ground as well.5. i have heard learned counsel for ..... manufacturer can get the sample re-tested before launching prosecution against him except in subsection (3) whereby he can challenge the report of the insecticide analyst only. section 24 of the act confers two rights i.e. the right to challege the correctness of the report of the analysis on the receipt of the show cause .....

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

..... be found in other enactments, which frustrates the smooth implementation of these enactments.the insecticides act, 1968(d) section 29 of the insecticides act reads thus:offences and punishment. (1) whoever (a) imports, manufactures, sells, stocks or exhibits for sale or distributes any insecticide deemed to be misbranded under subclause (i) or subclause (iii) or subclause ..... me in implementing the penal provisions of (i) the insecticides act, 1968 and (ii) the drugs and cosmetics act 1940 besides pointing out the changes required in these laws due to change in social order.the seeds act, 1966(a) section 19 of the seeds act reads as under:penalty - if any person (a) ..... in the offences taking place in relation to prevention of food adulteration act 1954, the seeds act 1966, the insecticides act 1968 and the drugs and cosmetics act 966 and in the instant cases in relation to prevention of food adulteration act and having found pitiable condition in relation to the misconceptions, knowledge and .....