Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 6 other committees Page 27 of about 243,469 results (0.607 seconds)

Jun 17 2004 (TRI)

Aero Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2006)(204)ELT61Tri(Mum.)bai

..... liquid, would be covered as repellents under the entry 37 to the notification which reads as- mosquito coils, mats and other mosquito repellants" and the same insecticide acting and delivered in same fashion could not be a repellant and covered by that entry. (f) the appellants have tried to distinguish between ..... of allethrin would be in same genre. the plea of aerosols not being covered by 'other repellants' on grounds of ejusdem generis would fail. (h) the assessments under section 4a are therefore called and duty as determined is upheld. (i) the advertising mode will not be relevant for classification. however, the change, in the advertising mode, ..... was substituted by the word "control". the substitution of the world "control" for repellant apparently has been made to place the product out of the purview of section 11a, though there was no change in the formulations and composition. since the product has been marketed as "repellant and ultimate customers by the product as repellant, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 2012 (HC)

Godrej Agrovet Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... is pending in the court of jmfc badnapur. the case is filed by respondent no.2, public servant for offences punishable under various sections of insecticides act, 1968 and rules framed under the act. both sides are heard. 2] copy of the complaint given by public servant shows that on 31/7/02, the inspector appointed under ..... was containing 33.74% of the substance as against 36% s.l. shown on the label. thus, the insecticide was found to be misbranded as per the provision of section 3(k) (1) of insecticides act, 1968. after collecting the information from rama sales corporation, notices were issued to all the accused who include manufacturer and private ..... be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. 7] the aforesaid provision shows that the insecticides act, 1968 has additional provision and that makes distinction between the provisions of this act and the provision of section 141 of n.i.act. further, the documents like reply given by shri r.k.bansal shows that he had personal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2014 (HC)

M/S Cheminova India Limited and Others Vs. the State of Punjab and Oth ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... is denied for want of knowledge. it is further submitted that the responsibility of the petitioner no.2 shall still stand for committing an offence by violating various sections of the insecticide act, 1968. . kumar deepak 2014.03.03 12:48 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document crl. misc. no.m-31122 of 2012 (o&m ..... complaint no.229-2 dated 16.12.2008 (annexure p/7) filed for offence under section 3 (k) (1).17, 18, 29 and 33 of insecticides act, 1968 read with rule 10, 1970 and 27 (5) of the insecticides rules, 1971. on 18.7.2005, insecticide inspector, fazilka visited the premises of petitioner no.1 and took the sample of clorpyriphos ..... chief agriculture officer, muktsar issued notice dated 16.8.2005 (annexure p/5) to the petitioner no.1 for violation of the provisions of insecticide act, 1968 and rules, 1971. the report of central insecticides laboratory, faridabad dated 14.9.2005 (annexure p/4) kumar deepak 2014.03.03 12:48 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2018 (HC)

Insecticides (India) Limited vs.parijat Industries (India) Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... year 2012 as aforesaid, but falsely claimed knowledge in november, 2015 and is disentitled from injunction on that ground alone; (vi) that a large number of insecticides under the name victor are available in the market and reference was made to (a) victor supplement of mohit agro industries, (b) victor verticillium of peak ..... respect to the marks victor gold and victor ; on the application dated 9th february, 2011 of the plaintiff for registration of victor gold in respect of insecticides, weedicides, herbicides, fungicides and preparations for destroying vermin, the trademark registry raised objection by issuing examination report wherein the plaintiff s mark victor gold was ..... a request for a hearing is applied for within the above mentioned said to have been application shall be abandoned for lack of prosecution under section 132 of the trade marks act, 1999 and there after the status of application in the computer database shall reflect the factual position ; treated time, the (ii) the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1990 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Paushak Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1990)(27)ECC257

..... 1987 (28) elt 409. the learned advocate for the respondents, however, contends that streptomycin and tetracycline are to be found in the schedule in the insecticides act, 1968. he also relies oh the certificate of registration issued by the ministry of agriculture and rural development, directorate of plant protection quarantine & storage, which shows ..... that streptocycline (paushamycin) has been registered as an insecticide for manufacture by the respondents.he relies on the publication of the central board for prevention and control of water pollution, new delhi under the ..... in the statement listing the names of the registered technical grade pesticides. it is also shown at sub-serial number 41 under serial number 129 ("insecticides, pesticides and weedicides"). part-a, appendix 3 of volume i of import and export policy april 1985-march 1988 (imports and export promotion).7 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1983 (HC)

In Charge Production, Haryana State Co-operative Supply and Marketing ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1595

..... where the sub-standard fertilizer is sold ultimately. section 23 of the insecticides act, 1868 is as follows :-persons bound to disclose place where insecticides are manufactured or kept:-every person for the time being in charge of any premises where any insecticide is being manufactured or is kept for sale ..... or distribution shall on being required by an insecticide inspector so to do, be legally bound to disclose to the insecticide ..... in the court of judicial magistrate, sultanpur lodhi against the proprietors of guru nanak khadstore, sultanpur lodhi and the petitioner under section 12a of the essential commodities act read with section 13 (1) (a) of the fertilizer control order 1957, (hereinafter called as the fertilizer order). the judicial magistrate has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 1973 (HC)

Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax Vs. I.C.i ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1973]32STC392(Ker)

..... we have to see whether inextricable link between the import and sale has been established.13. here there is an import licence in favour of m/s. hindustan insecticides limited, that import licence was referred to in the agreement for sale entered into by the assessee with consumer company, that licence was referred to in the contract ..... customers. from a specimen contract of supply produced by the appellant's agent, viz., the one in respect of supply of 72 tons of microcele to messrs. hindustan insecticides limited, udyogamandal p.o., kerala state, it is seen that the purchaser places orders with the appellant quoting the import licence number, quantity of goods, rate, etc., ..... these goods being diverted by the assessee for any other purpose. consequently we hold that the sales took place in the course of import of goods within section 5(2) of the act and are, therefore, exempt from taxation.9. their lordships laid emphasis in that case to the movement, of the goods from the foreign country as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2002 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. AlpIn Industries and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2003CriLJ329; (2002)3GLR713

..... ) sc 480. the apex court was dealing with a case under insecticides act, 1968. in reference to section 24 and the scheme of sub-sections (3), (4) & (5) of section 22 of the said act, the court observed that :-'thus, it would be clear that after inspection and seizure of the insecticide, the insecticide inspector shall divide the insecticide into three portions, ascontemplated and in the manner prescribed and deliver ..... one such sample to the manufacturer, or person from whom insecticide was taken. one should be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 22 2013 (SC)

Centre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... - biological counts in excess of such tolerance limit as may be specified by the regulations. it also provides that no insecticide shall be used directly on articles of food except fumigants registered and approved under the insecticide act, 1968.13. section 24 of the fss act deals with restrictions of advertisement and prohibition as to unfair trade practices and reads as follows: 24. restrictions of advertisement ..... active substances and micro- biological counts in excess of such tolerance limits as may be specified by regulations. (2)no insecticide shall be used directly on article of food except fumigants registered and approved under the insecticides act, 1968. explanation.- for the purposes of this section,- (1)".pesticide residue". means any specified substance in food resulting from the use of a pesticide and includes any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2018 (HC)

Upl Limited vs.pradeep Sharma & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... .p. for manufacture and supply of sulfosulfuron(75%) + metsulfuron methyl (5%) wg. it was further revealed that defendants have applied for registration under section 9 of the insecticides act 1968 for the composition of sulfosulfuron (75%) + metsulfuron methyl (5%) wg which is the composition as per the patents of the plaintiff. the plaintiff ..... statement the defendant admits that the plaintiff has also q.s. % total:100. 00 % w/w got a certificate of registration of insecticides under section 9(3) of the insecticides act for a herbicidal composition containing the following ingredients: a) 75% by weight of sulfosulfuron a.i. b) 5% by weight of metsulfuron methyl ..... 0.1% of -alkyl (c10-c16) hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) mixture. 15. as per the application of defendant its product an insecticide sought to be registered under section 9(3) of the insecticides act would have the composition as under: sulfosulfuron a.i. metsulfuron methyl a.i. dispersant:-"i) ii) iii) potassium carboxylate sodium .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //