Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1982Raj289; 1982()WLN521
..... by the learned counsel for the respondent that elaborate provisions are contained for the grant or refusal of permission for raising any constructions under section 170 of the act. under sub-section (12) of section 170 of the act any person aggrieved by such order. was entitled to prefer an appeal to the collector, within 30 days. so far as the ..... motu that the same was unlawful or might cause injury or there was a danger of the breach of the peace and he could have only acted under section 285 of the act. it could not be disputed that the plan in the present case should have been submitted to the urban improvement trust also under the coordination rules ..... as such nullity in law. it was contended that the order ex. a/4 clearly mention- ed in detail the grounds on which the collector acted under sec. 285 of the rajasthan municipalities act. the constructions sought for by the plaintiff was adjoining the anasagar bund an ancient monument and was in a protected area or a prohibited area .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1985]155ITR333(Raj); 1983()WLN732
..... 1960-61 and 1961-62 were completed on july 9, 1967, july 29, 1967, january 31, 1968 and february 24, 1968, respectively. the wealth-tax officer (for short 'wto') decided to initiate proceedings for levy of penalty under section 18(1)(a) of the act and, therefore, issued show-cause notice to that effect to the assessee on july 29, 1967, for ..... the first two years, on january 31, 1968, for the year 1960-61 and on february 24, 1968, for the year 1961-62.3. the wto was of ..... apply to all cases which have to be investigated in accordance therewith after october 22, 1956, even though the claim may have arisen before the amended section was inserted in the act. their lordships were further pleased to observe that it is well-settled that procedural amendments to a law apply, in the absence of anything to the contrary .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1984]147ITR32(Raj); 1974(7)WLN889
..... by declaring this compensation to be joint hindu family property, the assessee was inviting a liability to pay the maintenance twice over. this argument has no substance. section 27 of the abolition act reads as under : '27. amount of maintenance.--(1) any person who, under any existing jagir law, is entitled to receive a maintenance allowance out of ..... own court and see no reason to depart from the view taken therein. 16. the wealth-tax (amendment) act, 1964, amended section 4 of the act by introducing sub-section (6) according to which, for the purposes of w.t. act, the holder of an impartible estate shall be deemed to be an individual owner of all the properties comprised in ..... b.p. bert, c.j. 1. by this court's order dated december 16, 1968, the appellate tribunal was required under section 27(3) of the w.t. act, 1957 (hereinafter called 'the act'), to state a case to this court in respect of the assessee's assessment for the years 1957-58 to 1964-65, and refer the following question of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (2005)197CTR(Raj)1; [2006]283ITR486(Raj); 2004(3)WLC425
..... , which are very much the same as we have noticed above, even in the absence of aforesaid provision under the u.p. sales-tax act, as enacted under section 2(1a) of it act, 1961, still the same principle was applied. affirming the judgment of high court, apex court said :'it should be remembered that almost every ..... constitution of tea board. the tea board includes representatives of owners of tea estate and gardens and growers of tea and manufactures of tea. the act defines 'manufacturer' under section 3(i) to mean manufacturer of tea. while chapter iii provides control over the extension of tea cultivation, chapter ii-a deals with management or ..... being and continuing as such substantially.'59. in coming to this conclusion, the supreme court quoted the meaning of 'manufacture of tea' from encyclopedia britannica vol. 21 (1968 edn.) as under:'then comes the sub-head 'manufacture', which enumerates the categories of three classes of teas and then it is mentioned : 'most stages of processing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1997CriLJ1390; 1997(1)WLC370; 1996(2)WLN495
..... against the criminal'.'15. in the same context it may be recalled that way back in 1982 the apex court while dealing with a case under the andhra pradesh excise act, 1968. state of andhra pradesh v. s.r. rangadamapp, air 1982 sc 1492 : (1982 cri lj 2364) had expounded the law on the subject in the following ..... and not quantity of evidence is required to prove the existence of fact under our laws. this principle has been given a statutory recognition under the indian evidence act, 1872 in section 134 which says that no particular number of witnesses shall, in any case, be required for the proof of any fact. that being the position of the ..... appeal the learned addl. sessions judge, kishangarh bas, alwar confirmed the conviction and sentence of the petitioner as recorded by the learned trial magistrate. hence, this petition under section 397, cr.p.c.2. mr. biri singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently urged that the findings recorded by the two courts below about the guilt of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1991Raj33; 1990(1)WLN397
..... department with qualified persons and the high court authorises its officer to authenticate the translation and any such translation will be sufficient compliance with the provision of section 7 of the official language act. in the case of prabandhak samiti v. zita vidyalaya nirikshak, air 1977 all 164, a petition had been presented in hindi in devanagari script in ..... was not extended to any judgment and decree passed or made by the high court and therefore it is only in accordance with the provisions of ol act and more so its sections 6 and 7 that the optional use of hindi written in devanagari script has been permitted. therefore, in our opinion after coming into force of ..... the high court of rajasthan to the extent permissible under the provision of the said clause. similarly, after the commencement of the ol act and more so after coming into force of section 7 of ol act, which came into force on march 7, 1970, an order was made on february 17, 1971, by the governor after previous consent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1985Raj130
..... of procedure and adjudication proceedings have been rightly undertaken.29. in tikaram and sons ltd. v. commr. of sales tax, u. p. air 1968 sc 1286, section 11 of the uttar pradesh sales tax act was amended by act no. ft of 1954. the amendment of section 11 enabled the commissioner also to ask for reference. it was held that only existence of right under ..... of the contesting respondent.31. in kashavlal jethalal shah v. mohantal bhagwandas, air 1968 sc 1336, section 29(2) of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act 57 of 1947 was amended by gujarat act 18 of 1965. revision under section 115, c.p.c. against the appellate order under section 29(1) was pending before the high court prior to amendment of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1990]68CompCas666(Raj); 1989(2)WLN216; 1989(2)WLN591
..... interest, be withdrawn, it can do so after serving notice and giving opportunity of hearing in this respect. section 6 of the act empowers the central government to make any enquiry in the prescribed manner relating to the affairs of the governing body of the stock exchanges or any member ..... and experience before enrolling new members. in column 7, there is mention regarding the limit of the number of members proposed to be enrolled. under section 5 of the act, it is provided that if the central government is of the opinion that the recognition granted to the stock exchange, in the interest of trade/public ..... government in exercise of its powers conferred upon it under section 4 of the securities contracts (regulation) act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). the non-petitioner company submitted an application under section 3 of the act for recognition which was granted to it under section 4 of the act from january 9, 1989, for a period of one year .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1968Raj151
..... much help to the learned counsel for the petitioner.16. lastly, we may refer to the mysore case, (1967) 1 mys. lj 284 = (air 1968 mys 100). the validity of section 28 of the mysore sales tax act was challenged before the high court. the learned judges observed that the provisions relating to the confiscation were unconstitutional because there was total lack of ..... and r. k. abdul wahab and co. v. assistant commissioner of commercial taxes. bangalore. (19671 1 mys lj 284: (air 1968 mys 100).14. in 1965-16 stc 708 (mad) the vires of section 41 (4) of the madras general sales tax act, 1959, was challenged on two grounds firstly, that the provisions were beyond the legislative competence of the state and secondly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1974Raj116; 1973()WLN598
..... 1965 sc 1096 and p. vairavelu mudaliar v. sp. dy. collector, air 1965 sc 1017 has been held to be the just equivalent of the property acquired. under section 23 of the acquisition act there is no provision for taking into consideration the potential value of the land. the real grievance is that this land, which is being acquired for a negligible ..... . this purpose is obviously a public purpose.'and this was followed in ramanand's case.21. mr, gars invited our attention to the supreme court civil appeals nos. 2356 of 1968, 1139, 1140, 1475, 1476 and 1785 of 1971 and 1888 of 1970; munshi singh v. union of india decided on 23-8-1972 = (reported in air 1973 sc 1150). this ..... . b. munshi. air 1970 sc 898: kamlabai v. t. b. desai, air 1966 bom 36; union of india v. kamlabai, air 1968 sc 377; dau dayal v. state of u. p., air 1966 all 237: dalpathbhai hemchand v. chansma municipality. air 1968 guj 38; e. & t. agencies v. s. i. trust, air 1937 pc 265; dinshaw v. state of hyderabad, air 1955 .....
Tag this Judgment!