Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 6 other committees Court: karnataka dharwad Page 6 of about 343 results (0.294 seconds)

Oct 19 2022 (HC)

Smt.parvatevva H Hangi Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... herewith produced and marked as document no.1 for kind perusal of this hon ble court.4. i humbly submit that, after notification under section 11(1) of the act, 2013 to follow the procedure under rule 21 of the rule 2015, the tender was called to conduct a survey through private agency and ..... requirements contained in chapter-ii have not been exempted by issuing / publishing a duly gazetted gazette notification in the official gazette in accordance with section 10-a of the said act of 2013 (karnataka amendment), any acquisition and a preliminary notification 3 5 issued without following or complying with the said mandatory requirements/procedure would ..... in the official gazette exempting the application of social impact determination in respect of various types of projects including infrastructure projects as provided under section 10-a (b) of the said act of 2013.4. on 16.05.2020, the respondents state issued a notification exempting social impact assessment and 2 6 determination in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2022 (HC)

Vinayak S/o Narayana Rao Davande Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... herewith produced and marked as document no.1 for kind perusal of this hon ble court.4. i humbly submit that, after notification under section 11(1) of the act, 2013 to follow the procedure under rule 21 of the rule 2015, the tender was called to conduct a survey through private agency and ..... requirements contained in chapter-ii have not been exempted by issuing / publishing a duly gazetted gazette notification in the official gazette in accordance with section 10-a of the said act of 2013 (karnataka amendment), any acquisition and a preliminary notification 3 5 issued without following or complying with the said mandatory requirements/procedure would ..... in the official gazette exempting the application of social impact determination in respect of various types of projects including infrastructure projects as provided under section 10-a (b) of the said act of 2013.4. on 16.05.2020, the respondents state issued a notification exempting social impact assessment and 2 6 determination in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2022 (HC)

Shri Chetan S/o Mahantappa Kabbur Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... herewith produced and marked as document no.1 for kind perusal of this hon ble court.4. i humbly submit that, after notification under section 11(1) of the act, 2013 to follow the procedure under rule 21 of the rule 2015, the tender was called to conduct a survey through private agency and ..... requirements contained in chapter-ii have not been exempted by issuing / publishing a duly gazetted gazette notification in the official gazette in accordance with section 10-a of the said act of 2013 (karnataka amendment), any acquisition and a preliminary notification 3 5 issued without following or complying with the said mandatory requirements/procedure would ..... in the official gazette exempting the application of social impact determination in respect of various types of projects including infrastructure projects as provided under section 10-a (b) of the said act of 2013.4. on 16.05.2020, the respondents state issued a notification exempting social impact assessment and 2 6 determination in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2019 (HC)

Vaggeppa Gurulinga Jangaligi (Jangalagi) Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... received a complaint from psi on 23/9/2019 and sho26submitted a requisition to iv additional jmfc, athani, seeking permission to investigate the offence under section 87 of the k.p.act which is a non-cognizable offence. it is seen that the learned jurisdictional magistrate has made and endorsement on the requisition which reads as follows:-" ..... the information in a book to be maintained by the said officer in a prescribed form and ii) refer the informant to the magistrate. further, sub-section (2) of section 155 cr.p.c. mandates that no police officer shall investigate a non-cognizable offence without the order of a magistrate having power to try such ..... order.19. chapter v rule 1 of karnataka criminal rules practice, 1968 also deals with investigation of non-cognizable case. the said provision reads as follows:-"investigation and prosecution *1. report under section 154.- (1) on receipt of the report of the police officer under section 154 of the code, the magistrate shall make a note on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2022 (HC)

Mr.mallikarjun S/o Siddarai Suldhal Vs. The Special Deputy Commissione ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... a petition to the sub-divisional level committee, who shall consider and dispose of the said petition within the time prescribed, in terms of sub-section(2) of section 6 of the act.33. the sub-divisional level committee, which has been constituted by the state government is vested with the authority to examine the resolution passed ..... 1) were required to be made available for the committee to consider the application for determining the forest rights.9. further by relying upon sub-section 3 of section 4 of the act, she submits that the said documents would require them to establish that the forest dwellers had occupied the forest land before 13.12.2005. ..... depend on the forest or forests land for bona fide livelihood needs and as per explanation generation means a period comprising of twenty-five years.28. section 3 of the act provides for forest rights or forest-dwelling scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers, which includes right of ownership and access to collect, use and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2022 (HC)

Mr. Mallikarjun Vs. The Principal Secretary

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... a petition to the sub-divisional level committee, who shall consider and dispose of the said petition within the time prescribed, in terms of sub-section(2) of section 6 of the act.33. the sub-divisional level committee, which has been constituted by the state government is vested with the authority to examine the resolution passed ..... 1) were required to be made available for the committee to consider the application for determining the forest rights.9. further by relying upon sub-section 3 of section 4 of the act, she submits that the said documents would require them to establish that the forest dwellers had occupied the forest land before 13.12.2005. ..... depend on the forest or forests land for bona fide livelihood needs and as per explanation generation means a period comprising of twenty-five years.28. section 3 of the act provides for forest rights or forest-dwelling scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers, which includes right of ownership and access to collect, use and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2022 (HC)

Mr.mallikarjun S/o. Siddarai Suldhal Vs. The Principal Secretary, Depa ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... a petition to the sub-divisional level committee, who shall consider and dispose of the said petition within the time prescribed, in terms of sub-section(2) of section 6 of the act.33. the sub-divisional level committee, which has been constituted by the state government is vested with the authority to examine the resolution passed ..... 1) were required to be made available for the committee to consider the application for determining the forest rights.9. further by relying upon sub-section 3 of section 4 of the act, she submits that the said documents would require them to establish that the forest dwellers had occupied the forest land before 13.12.2005. ..... depend on the forest or forests land for bona fide livelihood needs and as per explanation generation means a period comprising of twenty-five years.28. section 3 of the act provides for forest rights or forest-dwelling scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers, which includes right of ownership and access to collect, use and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2024 (HC)

Veeresha S/o Siddappa Koravara Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... is not precluded from taking into consideration any other relevant and trustworthy material to determine the age as all the three eventualities mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 94 of the act are either not available or are not found to be reliable and trustworthy. since there is a document 44 signed by the appellant much before ..... as matriculation certificate, could be accepted by the court or the jj board provided such public document is credible and authentic as per the provisions of the evidence act viz. section 35 and other provisions. 33.11. ossification test cannot be the sole criterion for age determination and a mechanical view regarding the age of a person cannot ..... however, the documents mentioned in rules 12(3)(a)(i), (ii) and (iii) of the jj rules, 2007 made under the jj act, 2000 or sub- section (2) of section 94 of the jj act, 2015, shall be sufficient for prima facie satisfaction of the court. on the basis of the aforesaid documents a presumption of juvenility may be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2024 (HC)

Krantiveer Sangolli Rayanna Vs. Krantiveer Sangolli Rayanna

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... no.2 while registering the similar trust which is already in existence in the same name ought not to have registered the trust as against the provisions of section 7 of act of 1960 and also respondent no.1-trust is identical with the name of original trust which is in existence. it is also important to note that the ..... that respondent no.2 would not have registered the trust in the similar or identical name and hence the very registration is erroneous. he also contends that as per section 7 of act of 1960, no society shall be registered by a name which, in the opinion of the registrar, is undesirable. name of respondent no.1-trust is exactly identical ..... present writ petition seeking the relief of writ in the nature of certiorari.8. counsel for the petitioner also brought to notice of this court the very proviso of section 7 of act of 1960 and contends that no society shall be registered by a name which, in the opinion of the registrar, is undesirable. a name which is identical with, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2017 (HC)

Pradeep Sanjeev Shetty Vs. The Deputy Commissioner

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , bengaluru & another. almost similar facts and law are involved and considered wherein this court has held as under: karnataka local authorities (prohibition of defection) act, 1987, section 3(1)(a) and 3(1)(b)-disqualification on ground of defection-elections to chitradurga zilla panchayat-allegation 50 of flouting of whip issued by president of dcc ..... where the petitioner has been challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent no.1 for having held disqualification of the membership as keeping in view sec. 3(1)(b) of the act. therefore, in this background it is relevant to note here a decision of this court in 2016 (1) klj403smt. anitha h. basavaraj & ..... whip forms issued to the petitioners herein are marked but they have denied the signatures itself as forged and fabricated. 33 27. as per sec. 73 of the indian evidence act, it empowers to confirm the disputed signatures of the petitioners herein with their admitted signatures, when there is no expert opinion adduced by both .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //