Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Page 12 of about 123 results (0.087 seconds)

Mohan Lal (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. and ors. Vs. Thakurji Shri Shy ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(2)Raj969

..... the disputed property, therefore, the right of pre-emption had accrued in the disputed property in favour of the plaintiff under clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 6 of the rajasthan preemption act, 1966. the notification dated 17th of july, 1954 published in the rajasthan raj patra makes it clear that all the verandas within the four-walls ..... particularly when the pujari is claiming this property as his personal property and not of deity. the defendant no. 1 appellant purchased the disputed property in the year 1968 through registered sale-deed and for last 38 years he is residing in the said property. the hon'ble supreme court in the cases of indira bai v. ..... temple and one 'medhi' belonging to defendant no. 2, which has been sold by him to defendant no. 1 through sale deed dated 18th of october, 1968, registered on 13th november, 1968 for a consideration of rs. 3000/-. a map was also annexed with the plaint. the plaintiff's temple, shops and staircase were shown in yellow colour .....

Bajrang Lal Vs. Kanhaiya Lal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(2)Raj1551

..... authority is required only when the election petition is presented by the person authorised by the election petitioner. therefore also, it will be in consonance with section 36, if section 53 of the act of 1959 is read, that the security amount deposited even without written authority but with authority otherwise than written, that deposit is valid. therefore, it ..... jacob sole jacob reported in 1995(2) civil court cases 403 (s.c.) and [3] laxman siddappa naik v. kattimani chandappa jampanna and ors. reported in : [1968]2scr805 , have no application to the facts of the case and there is no dispute with respect to the proposition that the consequence of failing to prove the fact would ..... the appellant relied upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court delivered in the case of laxman siddapa naik v. kattimani chandappa jampanna and 0rs. reported in : [1968]2scr805 and the judgment of this court delivered in the case of smt. tara devi v. smt. sudesh chaudhary reported in 1997 [2] rlr 141. it is .....

Zonal Manager, Uco Bank Vs. Ram Prakash Prajapati

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2007(114)FLR314]; (2007)IILLJ664Raj; RLW2007(1)Raj579

..... referred by the appropriate government to the tribunal and again, vide award dated 27.12.1999 it was held by the tribunal that the provisions of section 25f of the act had not been followed while calculating wages of the workman and consequently compensation fell short. therefore, the workman was held entitled for reinstatement with continuity ..... with effect from 1 november 1967. an industrial dispute was referred by the government of gujarat to the special labour court. by an award, dated 13 november 1968, the special labour court directed the re-absorption of the ten clerks in future vacancies. the workmen filed a writ petition in the high court of gujarat. ..... of retrenchment is to be paid?23. as discussed above, it is settled position of law that in case of violation of mandatory provisions like section 25f of the act, reinstatement is the normal rule and deviation from the same can only be justified when there exists exceptional circumstances. some of the exceptional circumstances which .....

Poonam Arora (Mrs.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1321

..... application before the tribunal by filing reply. a plea was set up that the original application was beyond time prescribed under section 21 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (for short, 'act of 1985') and also that the subsequent charge-sheet dated 25th september, 1998 was valid being based on different and distinct ..... part of the charge was wholly dependent upon the first part. the impugned judgment to that extent is unassailable.22. rule 25 of the rules of 1968 provides for revisional powers to certain authorities. the said provision reads thus:25. revision (1) notwithstanding anything contained in these rules:(i) the president, or ..... same allegations, she was earlier charge-sheeted and punished and, therefore, issuance of second charge-sheet was not justified. she submitted that the rules of 1968 did not permit institution of successive disciplinary proceedings on the same allegations.9. upon receipt of the representation from the petitioner, vide communication dated 7th december .....

Anukampa Avas Vikas Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(3)Raj2295

..... v. union of india and ors. : (1991) 2 scc 407.17. counsel for the respondents has also touched the preliminary objection of availability of alternative remedy under section 83 of the jda act, 1982, of filing a reference application/appeal before the jda appellate tribunal against the order dated 4.3.2006 and has further submitted that the writ petition is ..... rewa choudhary where the status quo was ordered to be in force when the auction was held by the jda.42. supreme court in smt. kalawati v. bisheshwar : air 1968 sc 261 has made distinction between the term 'void' and 'not recognised' on account of the declaration made in the statute, wherein it has been held that the non- ..... as to the effect of the final order passed in revision upholding the permission, on the suit already instituted. in shyam lal v. state of u.p. : air 1968 all 139 a bench of this court has held that orders of stay or injunction are interim orders that merge in final orders passed in the proceedings. the result brought .....

Anupam Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj790

..... s) to (u)....(v) 'statutes', 'ordinances' and 'regulations' mean respectively, the statutes, ordinances and regulations of the university made under this act;(w) to (za)....section 33. incorporation.- (1)....(2) the movable and immovable property specified in the schedule i shall be vested in the university and the sponsoring body ..... all the colleges and institutions affiliated to it.s.o. 209in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 6 of the rajasthan university of health sciences act, 2005 (act no. 1 of 2005), the state government hereby terminates the territorial jurisdiction of university of rajasthan over ..... section provides that 'degree' means any such degree as may, with the previous approval of the central government, be specified in this behalf by the commission by notification in the official gazette. the value and importance of such degrees which are recognized by government was pointed out by a constitution bench in s. azeez basha v. union of india : [1968 .....

Sanjay Bhandari Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1460; 2009(1)WLN116

..... cognizance against the petitioner. hence this misc. petition.4. in criminal misc. petition no. 41/2008, a complaint under section 29(1) of the insecticides act, 1968 was filed by the assistant director of agriculture (extension) & insecticides inspector, hanumangarh junction, on 17.3.2006 alleging therein that the insecticide product imidachloprid 17.8% sl batch no. 2003-j-01 was misbranded. the sample of the aforesaid ..... insecticide was drawn and sent to the laboratory, which was found to be misbranded. the learned judicial magistrate, pilibanga, distt. hanumangarh .....

C.T.O. (Ae) Vs. Marudhara Motors

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1430; (2009)12VatReporter17

..... whether giving extended definition of 'retail sale' which sought to render consumption by the owner of motor spirit liable to tax under the concerned sales tax act by virtue of section 3, is beyond the competence of the state legislature and hence void. this court relying on its earlier decision in gannon and dunkerley (supra) ..... deputy commissioner (appeals) upheld the levy of tax upon the assessee, whereas, set aside the levy of interest and penalty imposed by the assessing authority under section 65 of the act. so far as levy of tax was upheld, the assessee was aggrieved and, therefore, it preferred six appeals for six different assessment years namely a.y ..... by a resolution of the government of india dated february 12, 1968 in exercise of the powers conferred by section 15 of the act. pursuant to the recommendation of this committee an order was promulgated by the central government in march 1968 under section 16 of the act which was to the following effect:'the warranty with which cars .....

State of Rajasthan Vs. Maharana of Mewar Charitable Foundation

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2010(1)Raj116

..... no sale deed was executed and registered, the defendant was entitled to protection as per the provisions of section 53a of the act and could maintain possession on the disputed property known as 'khush mahal', 'pachason-ki-lane' and 'hisab daftar'.9. the first appellate court, however, on the ..... was on defendant and said issue was decided in favour of defendant and against the plaintiff and it was held that as per the provisions of section 53a of the transfer of property act, the defendant was protected and was in possession of the property known as 'hisab daftar' for sum of rs. 30,000/- and even though ..... not being protected and upkept in accordance with the provisions of said act and the state government had shifted its various offices of different departments,the dispute arose between the parties and vide ex. 2 - notification dated 18.8.1969 the earlier notification dated 19.9.1968 was withdrawn in respect city palace (mardana mahal) udaipur. in .....

Subhan Khan. Vs. State.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... the coagulated juice of the opium poppy. the expression but does not include any preparation containing not more than 0.2% of morphine used in section 2(xv) of the ndps act actually governs the second kind of opium and not the first. this expression but does not include any preparation containing not more than 0.2% of ..... morphine appears in section 2(xv) of the ndps act as also in section 3 of the opium act,1878 and hon'ble apex court examined the definition of 'opium' contained in section 3 of the opium act,1878 in the case of baidyanath mishra and another v. state of orissa-1968 (xxxiv) cuttack law times. section 3(iii) of opium act,1878 reads as ..... under:3. interpretation-clause.(i) ....(ii)....(iii)any mixtyure, with or without neutral material, of any of the above forms of opium, but does not include any preparation containing not more than o.2 per cent of morphine, or a manufactured drug as defined in section .....