Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Sorted by: old Court: gujarat Page 6 of about 108 results (0.087 seconds)

Oct 18 1985 (HC)

Mohammedbhikhan Hussainbhai and Etc. Vs. the Manager, Chandrabhanu Cin ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1986Guj209; (1986)1GLR1

..... court speaking through tulzapurkar, j. (as he then was) held that officer on special duty under section 3 of the maharashtra co-operative societies act, 1968 was a court within the meaning ofsection 3 of the contempt of courts act as he satisfied the main two criteria in order to constitute the tribunal a court. in the first ..... of which it is appointed as the arbitrator by a submission; (c) whether a strike, lock-out, closure, stoppage or any change is illegal under this act'.section 79 deals with commencement of the proceedings before the labour court and provides that proceedings before a labour court in respect of disputes falling under clause (a) of ..... of industrial disputes relating to matters specified in the second schedule and for performing such other functions as may be assigned to them under the act. in sub-section (3) of section 7 qualifications for being appointed as presiding officer of the labour court are laid down which indicate that the concerned labour court judge may be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1986 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1987Guj113; (1987)1GLR437

..... legislation also was not sufficient to meet the requirements of the developing economy and hence the introduction of 'social control' by enacting the banking laws (amendment) act, 1968. this also failed to achieve the object and hence the nationalization of banks. 39. after the nationalization of banks, the banking companies and in particular respondent ..... ) hereinabove, in conformity with the national policy and objectives and matters concerned therewith or incidental thereto. 37. as per the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 3 of the banking companies act, the entire capital of each corresponding new bank stood vested in and allotted to the central government. thus, as per this provision, the ..... we feel that the decree passed against the state of gujarat cannot be permitted to be executed at this stage. 55. as per the provisions of the section 34 of the civil procedure code, the trial court, while passing the decree, could have awarded an agreed rate of interest (i.e., 15% or 16 1/2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1986 (HC)

Digvijay Cement Company Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1986(10)ECC359; 1987(10)LC7(Gujarat); 1986(25)ELT879(Guj); (1987)1GLR641

..... sub-rule (1) to receive material or component parts or finished product (like asbestos cement), on which the duty of excise or the additional duty under section 3 of the customs tariff act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the countervailing duty) has been paid in his factory for the manufacture of these goods or for mere ..... as substituted for the original rule 56a with effect from 28.12.1968 read as under :- '56a. special procedure for movement of duty paid materials or component parts for use in the manufacture of finished excisable goods (1) notwithstanding anything ..... excisable goods; or (b) remission or adjustment of duty paid for such material or component part has been specifically sanctioned by the central government. 11. thereafter on 27.12.1968, proviso to sub-rule (2) of rule 56a was recast and it was divided in sub-paras (i) and (ii). the said recast proviso alongwith rule 56a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1986 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. R.N. Vora and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1987)2GLR725

..... limited., bombay and the accused no. 3, regional manager, s.m.p. pvt. ltd., ahmedabad, from the charge under sections 3(k), 17(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) of the insecticides act, 1968. having been aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the said acquittal judgment, the present appeal is preferred by the state of gujarat.2. ..... the complainant holds the requisite qualifications for his post which are required under the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act').4. under the act, the complainant is empowered to inspect the premises and to take samples of the insecticide materials in order to verify whether they are manufactured as per the requirements under ..... on the activities ascribed to an inspector.10. in this connection, it is necessary to refer to section 20 of the act, which relates to insecticide inspectors. the relevant part of section 20 of the act runs as under:20. insecticide inspectors - (1) the central government or a state government, may, by notification in the official .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1987 (HC)

U.K. Acharya and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1989Guj81; (1988)1GLR209

..... regards. the various schemes undertaken by the board, after the programme is so sanctioned, the execution thereof is contemplated by s. 33 of the act. section 34 stipulates the publication of the housing schemes in the official gazette. these are the only relevant provisions of chapter iii for the purpose of determining this writ petitions ..... is required to be sanctioned, the sanction which is required to be obtained for the programme and final publication of the sanctioned programme. these four sections, therefore, show that the act envisages not only the publication of the programme for housing schemes but also the invitation of suggestions and objections from the members of the public as ..... income is above rs. 6,000/- but does not exceed rs. 15,000/-. 37. we are told that both these definitions have undergone amendments in the year 1968 with the result that instead of the figure of rs. 6,000/-, the figure of rs. 7,200/- should be read in both the clauses and instead of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 1988 (HC)

Tata Chemicals Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1988)1GLR589

..... , 9 per cent of the rateable value, determined by the municipal corporation at its meeting held on 31st january, 1968 was challenged as (i) ultra vires section 99; (ii) inconsistent with section 137 and (iii) violative of article 14 of the constitution ..... decision of this court in special civil application no. 662 of 1968 and 179 other petitions decided on 14/21/22/23/24/27th october 1969 (per bhagwati j., as he then was) based on the construction of sections 99, 129, proviso, 137 and 150 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949. in that case the special rate of conservancy tax, namely .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1988 (HC)

Pramodbhai Bhulabhai Desai Vs. Officer on Special Duty No. 2, (Land Ac ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1989Guj187; (1989)1GLR194

..... we do not find any substance in respect of this point also.39. mr. oza next contended that procedure provided under s. 8 of the land acquisition act is not followed. section 6(2), inter alia, state that the discussion under s. 6 shall state the district or other territorial division in which the land is situated, the ..... 2 is totally estoppel from going back upon its promise.27. the petitioner further states that after issuance of the earlier s. 4 notification in the year 1968 there was a negotiation with the second respondent and on an understanding being arrived at the land of the petitioner of survey number 552 was denotified this, according ..... acres and 25 square metres in the village vapi, taluka pardi at valsad district. in respect of these lands earlier s. 4 notification was issued on 13th mar., 1968 followed by s. 6 notification on 11th mar., 1972. the petitioner represented to the authorities concerned the advisability of dropping the acquisition of 34 this survey number stating .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1988 (HC)

Union of India Vs. Wood Papers Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1991(53)ELT189(Guj); (1989)2GLR1323

..... tax to the consumers and who themselves suffer no burden thereof.' thereafter in that very judgment three basic requirements for completing a cause of action under section 72 of the contract act have been spelt out, and they have been extracted and referred to hereinabove in para 14 of this judgment. 17. in the decision of dhrangadhra ..... year 1964. the witness is aware about the definition of straw-board given in notification no. 68 of 1966 (exh. 118). by letter dated august 26, 1968 the plaintiff company has informed the central excise department that they had not manufactured printing has informed the central excise department that they had not manufactured printing papers, ..... on little scrutiny of the registers it becomes abundantly clear that the grammage is not mentioned against all the columns. the register exh. 98 starts with january 21, 1968. at the top it is written 'straw-board rolls'. in the first column roll number is written; in the second column size is written; in the third .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 1989 (HC)

Manubhai Sudhabhai Sodha Vs. the State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1548

..... instances, the externment order cannot become vitiated.in the case of state of gujarat v. mehbubkhan, reported in air 1968 sc 1468 : (1969 cri lj 26) the supreme court held that the notice under section 59 of the act should inform the person in writing of the general nature of the material allegations against him and it need not contain ..... forth by mr. g.d. bhatt, learned assistant public prosecutor, there is no time bound programme as in detention laws for the purpose of externing under section 56 of the bombay police act. in para 3 of the additional affidavit-in-reply, shri h.r. gehlot, deputy commissioner of police has clearly explained the delay, which, in our ..... passed by the respondent no. 2. on 27-1-1987, the deputy police commissioner, surat city, who is the respondent no. 2, issued notice under section 56 of the bombay police act, alleging the following charges against the petitioner herein :'(1) on 19-7-1985, at 00.20 hours, there was exchange of stone-throwing between the hindus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 1989 (HC)

Raval Ichchhashanker Mahashanker Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1990)1GLR291

..... that as per this rule, food inspectors are selected from three different categories. one such category is that a person must have qualification as food inspector under section 9 of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 and the rules made thereunder. the said rule 3(b) of the rules reads as under :3. to be eligible for appointment by direct selection ..... excise inspectors would be conducive to better administrative efficiency.2. mr. j.v. desai also cited the decision in the case of roshan lal v. union of india reported in : (1968)illj576sc . in that case before the impugned notification was issued, there was only one rule of promotion for both the departmental promotes and the direct recruits and that rule was .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //