Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: supreme court of india Page 8 of about 575 results (0.194 seconds)

Goura Venkata Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2004(3)ALT48(SC); JT2003(9)SC12; 2003(9)SCALE808; (2003)12SCC469

..... punished with the punishment provided for the original offence. 'act abetted' in section 109 means the specific offence abetted. therefore, the offence for the abetment of which a person is charged with the abetment is normally linked with the proved ..... by persuasion to do any thing. the abetment may be by instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid, as provided in the three clauses of section 107. section 109 provides that if the act abetted is committed in consequence of abetment and there is no provision for the punishment of such abetment, then the offender is to be ..... rule out application of 302 ipc, as was submitted by learned counsel for the appellants. a-1 is liable to be convicted under section 109 also because at his instigation the other assailants acts were done thereof. there was no delay in lodging the first information report. the occurrence, according to prosecution, took place at 10. .....

Ramesh Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC1908; 1963MhLJ321(SC); [1963]3SCR396

..... out a case against the appellant of abetment of the offence of procreation of a minor girl punishable under s. 366a of the indian penal code section 366a was enacted by act xx of 1923 to give effect to certain articles of the international convention for the suppression of traffic in women and children signed by various nations at ..... bar that in respect of those offences the accused were acquitted and we are not concerned in this case with those offence) - and also for offences punishable under sections 366 and 366a of the indian penal code against nine persons including the appellant, patilba and devidas. in the course of proceedings for commitment to the court of session ..... code. it cannot be said that thereby he induces her to go from any place or to do any act with the intent or knowledge contemplated by the section. 10. we agree that seduction to illicit intercourse contemplated by the section does not mean merely straying from the path of virtue by a female for the first time. the verb .....

Sohan Raj Sharma Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC2108; 2008(1)ALD(Cri)941; 2008CriLJ2569; 2008(2)KLT287(SC); 2008(6)SCALE192; (2008)11SCC215

..... about by persuasion to do any thing. the abetment may be by instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid, as provided in the three clauses of section 107. section 109 provides that if the act abetted is committed in consequence of abetment and there is no provision for the punishment of such abetment, then the offender is to be punished ..... basing a finding that the accused charged of abetting the offence of suicide should be found guilty. 10. section 107 ipc defines abetment of a thing. the offence of abetment is a separate and distinct offence provided in the act as an offence. a person, abets the doing of a thing when (1) he instigates any person ..... the original offence. 'abetted' in section 109 means the specific offence abetted. therefore, the offence for the abetment of which a person is charged with the abetment is normally linked with the proved offence11. in cases of alleged abetment of suicide there must be proof of direct or indirect acts of incitement to the commission of suicide .....

Om Prakash Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (of abetment) by reading the offence punishable with the aid of section 34 ipc. rather she is convicted and sentenced only under section 109 ipc for abetment as she aided the commission of rape by other two accused.13. section 109 ipc provides that whoever abets any offence, shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision ..... is made for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the main offence.14. section 107 ipc defines abetment of a thing as under .....

Kishangiri Mangalgiri Goswami Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(3)KCCR1889; AIR2009SC1808; 2009CriLJ1720; (2009)2GLR1074(SC); RLW2009(1)SC350; 2009(1)SCALE31; (2009)4SCC52; 2009AIRSCW1399; 2009Cr.LJ1720

..... about by persuasion to do any thing. the abetment may be by instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid, as provided in the three clauses of section 107. section 109 provides that if the act abetted is committed in consequence of abetment and there is no provision for the punishment of such abetment, then the offender is to be ..... -1999 after pouring kerosene on her body. thus, as per the prosecution case, the appellant has committed the offence punishable under section 498a and 306 ipc read with sections 3 and 7 of dp act. the complaint was given by dhulagiri gumangiri goswami on 17.5.1999. on the strength of the complaint given by the complainant ..... division bench of the gujarat high court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under sections 306 and 498a of the indian penal code, 1860 (in short the `ipc') and section 3 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (in short `dp act'). learned additional sessions judge, court no. 9, ahmedabad city imposed sentences of 3 years, .....

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mukesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR317(SC)]; 2006(10)SCALE346

..... show that respondents had intentionally aided the said suresh shah and thereby abetted him in commission of an offence under section 143(1) of the indian railways act.11. ms. makhija may be correct in contending that the high court has made a wrong observation that all the circumstances appearing against ..... is based on the purported confession of suresh shah. a statement of an accused would be admissible against a co-accused only in terms of section 30 of the indian evidence act. such a statement of co-accused was required to be corroborated by adduction of independent evidence. the prosecution has not adduced any independent evidence to ..... one occasion. once a filled-up form is passed over, the reservation clerks had admittedly no discretion in the matter but to issue tickets.8. section 143(1) of the railways act reads, thus:143. penalty for unauthorised carrying on of business of procuring and supplying of railway tickets.--(1) if any person, not being a .....

State of Rajasthan Vs. Shobha Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the person who actually commits a crime and only that person can be held guilty and punished in accordance with law for his individual act.15. it is thus clear that the criminal act referred to in section 34 ipc is the result of the concerted action of more than one person if the said result was reached in furtherance of the ..... liability is found in the existence of common intention animating the accused leading to the doing of a criminal act in furtherance of such intention. the section is intended to meet a case in which it is difficult to distinguish between the act of individual members of a party and to prove exactly what part was played by each of them. it ..... ) 3 scc 161]. and saravanan and another vs. state of pondicherry [(2004) 13 scc 238].. in the case of nadodi jayaraman and others (supra), the court has observed:- 9. section 34 of ipc enacts that when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons, is liable for that .....

Gangula Mohan Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2010SC327; JT2010(1)SC17; RLW2010(1)SC639; 2010(1)SCALE1; (2010)1SCC750; 2010(1)LC142(SC)

..... this court is clear that in order to convict a person under section 306 ipc there has to be a clear mens rea to commit the offence. it also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option and this act must have been intended to push the deceased into such a position ..... act, and thereby facilitate the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act.13. learned counsel for the appellant has ..... to the doing of that thing; orthirdly - intentionally aides, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.12. explanation 2 which has been inserted along with section 107 reads as under:explanation 2 - whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that .....

Feroz DIn and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC363; (1960)ILLJ244SC; [1960]2SCR319

..... absurd result would thus be produced. 20. by an amendment made on october 2, 1953, certain provisions have been introduced into the act which would show clearly that lock-out as defined in s. 2(1), which section has been left unaltered by the amendment, was never intended to include a discharge of workmen. we refer to s. 2(00) by ..... in consequence of an illegal lock-out and a lock-out declared in consequence of an illegal strike shall not be illegal. section 25 prohibits the spending of money on illegal strike and lock-outs. 17. the act therefore treats strike and lock-outs on the same basis; it treats one as the counterpart of the other. a strike is ..... and that they had instigated them, but they contend that the strikes were of illegal. 7. section 27 of the act provides that a person who instigates or incites others to take part in, or otherwise act in furtherance of strike, which is illegal under the act, commits an offence. the respondent's case is that the strikes were illegal under s. .....

Kulwant Singh Vs. Amarjit Singh and Two Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC1212; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)807; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)324; 2000CriLJ1722; JT2000(3)SC43; 2000(2)SCALE242; (2000)3SCC290; [2000]2SCR141; 2000(1)LC714(SC)

..... would be met, if he is allowed to be released on the sentence already undergone. it was then contended that jagsir singh is convicted under section 27 of the arms act for two years rigorous imprisonment. only evidence that occurs against him is that jagsir singh instigates amar jeet singh to fire from the gun. even ..... all the accused persons except the respondents 1 and 2. as noted above, respondent 1, amarjit singh was convicted under section 307, ipc and section 27 of the arms act. jagsir singh was convicted under section 27 of the arms act. in sessions case no. 65/94 where kulwant singh, the appellant before us, was one of the accused, ..... appeal high court maintained the conviction of amarjit singh but reduced his sentence to already undergone. jagsir singh was, however, acquitted of the offence under section 27 of the arms act. aggrieved complainant has sought leave to appeal against the judgment of the high court.4. when both the special leave petitions came up for admission this .....