Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 16 central insecticides laboratory Page 3 of about 1,685 results (0.180 seconds)

Excel Corp. Care Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... any opportunity to show cause. the order impugned is illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction as it has been passed in violation of the provisions under section 14 of the insecticides act, as well as in violation of rule of natural justice.6. considering the admission on the part of the state respondents that no licence was ..... products but their licences have been cancelled simply because one product is alleged to have been misbranded. the order has been passed in violation of section 24(1) of the insecticides act, as reports were not delivered within 60 days of the collection of the samples from the shops of the retail dealers.(iii) the sample ..... order dated 20.6.07 issued under the signature of director agriculture, bihar, patna whereby licences granted to the petitioners in form no. viii under section 13 of the insecticides act bearing different licence numbers have been cancelled. all these writ applications were heard together and are being disposed of by a common order.2. petitioners .....

Bharat Pulverising Mills Limited Madras Vs. the Joint Director of Agri ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1993Mad74; (1992)IIMLJ511

..... insecticides act, 1968 is enacted to regulate the import, manufacture, sale, transport, distribution and use of insecticide with a view to prevent risk to human beings or animals, and for matters connected therewith. in order to appredate the contentions of both parties, it is necessary to extract the relevant provisions of the act. section 3(e) of the act ..... 12-90 to 25-12-1990. against this order, the petitioner preferred an appeal to the appellate authority, who is the director of agriculture, under the insecticides act, 1968 and the appellate authority upheld the order of the original authority. hence the petitioner is before the court challenging the order of suspension passed by the appellate ..... article must be deemed to be 'misbranded'. it is also alleged in the affidavit that under s. 3(k)(i) of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act) will not apply to a case where the actual quantity found in the container is less than the quantity declared on the label. it .....

Y.R.S. Rao Vs. Deputy Director of Agriculture and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1364

..... madhava reddy, j.1. in this batch of writ petitions the validity of sections. 3 (k)(1), 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1969 (central act 46 of 1968) (hereinafter referred to as the act or insecticides act) is challenged as unconstitutional, violating articles. 14, 19(1)(d)(f) and (g) and 21 of the constitution of india.2 ..... there is contravention of any of those provisions. only by such provision it would be possible to effectively enforce the provisions of the act and the rules.' section 33 of the insecticides act imposes no more additional liability on the persons in charge of the business of the company then it imposed on any person who conducts ..... conduct of the business of the company, shall be liable to be proceeded against in respect of any offence under the act. section 33(1) of the insecticides act reads as follows:section 33(1): whenever an offence under this act has been committed by a company, every person who at the time the offence was committed was in charge of, .....

Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)135PLR89

..... rule 10 of the rules, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act and the rules').4. it is stated in the complaint that amarjit lal, agricultural ..... insecticides laboratory, faridabad, for analysis under cover of its letter dated 3.9,1996. by report dated 1.11.1996, the central insecticides laboratory, faridabad, declared the sample as misbranded. sanction for prosecution was obtained and a complaint was filed under sections 3k(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 and insecticides ..... to preventing risk to human being and animals. the dealer is under a legal obligation to supply the insecticides products as per the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968. the provisions of the insecticides act are designed to protect the entire population as the ill effect of pesticides pass on to the ultimate consumer .....

Narinder Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4157

..... petitioner was summoned after the expiry of the shelf life of the sample, therefore, he has lost his valuable right under section 24(4) of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') of getting the samples of insecticides re-tested from the central insecticide laboratory.3. in this case, on 12-8-1994, a sample of phorat 10%g, which was manufactured by m ..... kumar gupta, who was the manager of m/s. somanil chemicals, the manufacturer of the misbranded insecticide, has filed this petition under section 482, cr. p.c. for quashing of the complaint filed against him under section 29(1)(a) and section 17(1)(a) of the insecticides act, 1968 and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. in this petition, the contention of the petitioner is that .....

Crop Health Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2004)(166)ELT366TriDel

..... to the appellant by plant protection section of the department of agriculture, u.p. under the insecticides act. under the schedule of insecticides licence for manufacture the product in question is shown as item no. 56.certificate of registration of insecticides granted to the appellant under section 9(4) of the insecticides act, 1968 contains details of the use of ..... and also by m/s.hindustan antibiotics ltd. pimpri, pune (a government undertaking) since long under licences obtained under the insecticides act 1968.reliance is placed on a declaration signed by hindustan antibiotics ltd. duly certified by excise department stating the use of said product as pesticide ..... points out that the product is being manufactured under licence issued to it under the insecticides act. this particular product is shown as serial no. 56 in the licence. the said licence has been issued by the plant protection section of the department of agriculture, u.p., lucknow, by the director, agriculture licensing .....

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... can cause birth defects and damage to most plants that it comes into contact with. it is banned in europe and not permitted in india under the insecticides act, 1968 for mustard. it is an organophosphorus compound (toxic to biology) very similar in structure to glyphosate and as weeds become more resistant, they will eventually ..... the parliament. the answering of parliamentary questions is a part of the conduct of business of the parliament. therefore, no question about its admissibility under section 74, the indian evidence act, 1872 would arise. for ease of reference, the said questions and answers are extracted as under: writ petition (civil) no.115 of 2004 ..... koli samaj parivartan trust v. state of gujarat (2-judge bench)13, wherein this court while considering the functions of the ngt observed: 16. sections 14 and section 15 entrust adjudicatory functions to the ngt. the ngt is a specialized body comprising of judicial and expert members. judicial members bring to bear their experience .....

Ramesh Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2645; 1992(1)WLC284

..... . 615/86) decided on 16-10-87 at jaipur bench, and (iii) the report was not delivered within 60 days thus it is violative of the provisions of section 24 of the insecticides act and the entire proceedings against the petitioners amount to abuse of the process of the court.4. mr. v.s. choudhary, learned public prosecutor has opposed these arguments and ..... reported to be misbranded. shri kundan singh gil, ex. district agriculture officer, hanumangarh after obtaining necessary sanction against the petitioners filed a complaint for the offence under section 29(1)(a) of the insecticide act on 25-9-82. the learned magistrate dismissed the complaint on 25-1-86. being aggrieved by the order, the state filed a revision which was allowed by .....

Dr. L.C. Rohella and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)133PLR195

..... sanction was required under the provisions of section 31 of the insecticide act, 1968 and the aforesaid provisions contained in section 31 were mandatory and no cognizance of the offences could have taken nor the trial in the case commenced. for the ..... it was found that there was variation in the active ingredients and, therefore, the aforesaid sample was declared as misbranded under the provisions of section 3(k)(i) of the insecticide act, 1968.3. sh. arun nehra, learned counsel for the petitioners has sought the quashing of the complaint on the ground that in fact prior ..... the complaint annexure p-4 pending in the court of chief judicial magistrate, jalandhar, which had been tiled under the provisions of section 33 of the insecticide act, 1968 read with rule 27(5) of insecticide rules, 1971. a copy of the aforesaid complaint has been attached as annexure p-4 with the present petition.2. petitioner no .....

Dr. B.S. Phogat S/O Shri Daulat Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... learned counsel would contend that unless the re-designation and merger of the posts is notified, the post of weed specialists not being created under insecticides act, 1968 and without amendment of the rules, the applicant, if transferred to hyderabad, would be highly prejudiced as he would not be considered as feeder ..... cbi & rc and cil located at hyderabad and others are in kanpur and chandigarh. nppti at hyderabad, which imparts training, is not formulated under insecticides act, 1968.3. in the wake of 5th central pay commissions recommendations contained in para 56.21, ministry of agriculture by an order dated 28.5.2003 ..... scientific officer (bioassay) through union public service commission and was later on re-designated as deputy director in the bioassay division of cil, faridabad under the insecticides act, 1968.the recruitment rules for sr. scientific officer (sso bio) prescribed qualification of msc (agriculture) in agronomy (herbicides) with minimum five years research experience. .....