Initiate - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: initiate Page 1 of about 72 results (0.034 seconds)Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. Vs. Siracusano
Court: US Supreme Court
Remedy accounted for approximately 70 percent of Matrixxs sales. Respondents initiated this securities fraud class action against Matrixx on behalf of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwift Initiative Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dilip Chhabria Design Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
the Franchisor 3 (three) months before the expiration of the Initial Term of 5 (five) years. ARTICLE 3 GRANT 3.1 Franchisee
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“initially the Investigation the Case Was Carried out by S.i. Hukam ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
only be quashed in rarest of rare case at the initial stage as per the following conditions:- (i) Where the allegations
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTInitiating Officer, Acit Benami Prohibition vs.appellate Tribunal Unde ...
Court: Delhi
Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against proceedings initiated under the PMLA Act.7. The present show-cause notice dated 21st
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrabha Misra Initially Dixit (Smt.) Vs. District Judge
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: (2005)1UPLBEC645
benefit was given since the petitioner in that case was initially appointed on 12.7.1989.8. Learned Counsel for the respondent, however, submitted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“24. Initiating the Argument Shri N.K. Tanwar Vs. M/S Goodyear India ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
policy dated 03.04.1978; however, it deposited only 25% of the initial demand raised and failed to pay the balance amount, which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinitiating Explosives Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Reported in: (2008)9STR509
sales and marketing agents for IES in respect of our Initiating Explosives products. For this purpose, ICI had outsourced and procured
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLawyers Initiative Through Its Member Veena Kumari Vs. State of Punjab ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15133-1996 Date of decision:-04.02.2014 Lawyers Initiative through its member Veena Kumari, Advocate and member Lawyers Initiative
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinitiative for Transportation and Development Pro Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
versus GOVT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents W.P. (C) 8580/2009 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinitiative for Transportation and Development Prog Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
AND ORS. ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 8580/2009, C.M. APPL.5656/2009 & 8503/2012 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>