Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: information technology amendment act 2008 section 46 amendment of section 87 Court: karnataka Page 20 of about 1,501 results (0.149 seconds)

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Galactus Funware Technology Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnatka

Court : Karnataka

..... communication device, electronic application, software, online gaming and computer resource as defined in information technology act, 2000 (central act 21 of 2000) or under this act. table-2 (amendment to substantive provisions namely sections78 79, 80, 87, 114, 128a &176) pre-amendment post amendment (6) section 78 (1)(a)(vi): section 78 (1)(a)(vi)(vii): ..... , communication device . computer network , computer resource , computer system , cyber caf and electronic record used in this act shall have the respective meaning assigned to them in the information technology act, 2000 (central act 21 of 2000). (4) clause 12a of section 2: online gaming means and includes games as defined in clause ..... any transaction or internet or any scheme of wagering or communication device as betting in which the defined in the information receipt or distribution of technology act, 2000 winnings or prizes in (central act 21 of 2000)]. money or otherwise is opens, keeps or uses the made to depend on same for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... communication device, electronic application, software, online gaming and computer resource as defined in information technology act, 2000 (central act 21 of 2000) or under this act. table-2 (amendment to substantive provisions namely sections78 79, 80, 87, 114, 128a &176) pre-amendment post amendment (6) section 78 (1)(a)(vi): section 78 (1)(a)(vi)(vii): ..... , communication device . computer network , computer resource , computer system , cyber caf and electronic record used in this act shall have the respective meaning assigned to them in the information technology act, 2000 (central act 21 of 2000). (4) clause 12a of section 2: online gaming means and includes games as defined in clause ..... any transaction or internet or any scheme of wagering or communication device as betting in which the defined in the information receipt or distribution of technology act, 2000 winnings or prizes in (central act 21 of 2000)]. money or otherwise is opens, keeps or uses the made to depend on same for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2021 (HC)

Ani Technologies Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... provision of law underwent an amendment by 7 the amending act 65 of 1984, the maximum offence punishable was changed from one year to three years. it is germane to notice the objects and reasons for bringing out said amendment. piracy has become a global problem due to the rapid advances in technology. it has assumed alarming proportions ..... .2021, coming on for pronouncement this day, the court made the following:- 3 order the 1st petitioner/ani technologies private limited and its directors are before this court calling in question registration of fir in crime no.191 of 2017 and all further proceedings taken thereto.2. brief facts leading to the filing ..... hearing)) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india read with sectopm482f code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quash the registration of fir vide annexure-a by the r-1 jeevanbhimanagar police in cr no.191/2017 its investigation and all its consequential proceedings vide annexure-h1 pending on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2018 (HC)

Transvahan Technologies India pvt.ltd. Vs. Sepson India Pvt Ltd

Court : Karnataka

..... in c.a. no.4690/2018 reported in 2018 scc online sc487 wherein it is stated that section 8 of the act was amended by amendment act no.3/2016 w.e.f. 23.10.2015 amending section 8(1) of the act on the basis of the recommendations made by the law commission of india in view of dictum of the hon ble ..... counsel for the respondents would further contend that the judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners in the case of ananthesh bhakta was under the un-amended old act. therefore, the same is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case. he would further contend that the trial court is justified in relying upon ..... court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the1t day of august, 2018 before the hon' ble mr. justice b. veerappa writ petition no.48325/2017(gm-cpc) between:1. transvahan technologies india pvt.ltd. registered office at:202. kt-35, 89/1, 6th main, 16th cross, malleswaram, bengaluru-560003. represented by its managing director, s.r.venkatesan2 s. r. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2022 (HC)

Mpp Technologies Pvt Ltd Vs. Rupa Banerji

Court : Karnataka

..... summoned will in all likelihood be convicted?. 6.5. (v) does the power under section 319 crpc extend to persons not named in the fir or named in the fir but not charged or who have been discharged?.7. in this reference what we are primarily concerned with, is the stage at which such powers ..... .4810 of2022criminal petition no.4811 of2022criminal petition no.4812 of2022criminal petition no.4813 of2022criminal petition no.4814 of2022criminal petition no.4815 of20222 in criminal petition no.4600 of2022between: mpp technologies pvt. ltd., no.487/c, 14th cross, 14th phase, peenya industrial area bengaluru - 560 058 represented by mr.l.g.satish marketing manager. ... petitioner ..... all these cases invoked section 200 of the crpc and registered private complaints for offences punishable under sections 138 and 141 of the negotiable 33 instruments act 1881 ( the act for short). cognizance was taken on the offences and the matter was set for trial. it is what happens during the trial that concerns these .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2022 (HC)

Mpp Technologies Pvt Ltd Vs. P K Majumdar

Court : Karnataka

..... summoned will in all likelihood be convicted?. 6.5. (v) does the power under section 319 crpc extend to persons not named in the fir or named in the fir but not charged or who have been discharged?.7. in this reference what we are primarily concerned with, is the stage at which such powers ..... .4810 of2022criminal petition no.4811 of2022criminal petition no.4812 of2022criminal petition no.4813 of2022criminal petition no.4814 of2022criminal petition no.4815 of20222 in criminal petition no.4600 of2022between: mpp technologies pvt. ltd., no.487/c, 14th cross, 14th phase, peenya industrial area bengaluru - 560 058 represented by mr.l.g.satish marketing manager. ... petitioner ..... all these cases invoked section 200 of the crpc and registered private complaints for offences punishable under sections 138 and 141 of the negotiable 33 instruments act 1881 ( the act for short). cognizance was taken on the offences and the matter was set for trial. it is what happens during the trial that concerns these .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2022 (HC)

Mpp Technologies Pvt Ltd Vs. Sri P K Majumdar

Court : Karnataka

..... summoned will in all likelihood be convicted?. 6.5. (v) does the power under section 319 crpc extend to persons not named in the fir or named in the fir but not charged or who have been discharged?.7. in this reference what we are primarily concerned with, is the stage at which such powers ..... .4810 of2022criminal petition no.4811 of2022criminal petition no.4812 of2022criminal petition no.4813 of2022criminal petition no.4814 of2022criminal petition no.4815 of20222 in criminal petition no.4600 of2022between: mpp technologies pvt. ltd., no.487/c, 14th cross, 14th phase, peenya industrial area bengaluru - 560 058 represented by mr.l.g.satish marketing manager. ... petitioner ..... all these cases invoked section 200 of the crpc and registered private complaints for offences punishable under sections 138 and 141 of the negotiable 33 instruments act 1881 ( the act for short). cognizance was taken on the offences and the matter was set for trial. it is what happens during the trial that concerns these .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2015 (HC)

M/S Wipro Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Karnataka

..... a letter dated 04.03.2004 agreed for allocation of only a part of the expenditure related to salary, wages and allowances and directors fee at 20% to wipro technologies which is a 10a unit and which had generated 57% of the revenue of the assessee. assessing authority did not agree with assessee s submission and allocated expenses ..... (rs.) 3,16,74,625 corporate 259,73,500 82% name azim h. premji vivek paul 2,37,61,102 wipro technologies 1,9484,103 18% reduced from wipro technologies arun thyagarajan 52,33,294 wipro infotech wipro 4291301.08 82% p.s. pai 79,18,656 consumer 6493297.9 82% care - 103 - 81. aggrieved by the ..... of information, investigation of cases and recovery of income tax. with effect from 1.4.2004, clause (a)(ii) was substituted to provide for entering into an agreement for granting relief in respect of income tax chargeable under this act and under corresponding law in force in that country, to promote mutual economic relations, trade and investment. with this amendment the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2014 (HC)

Sri Sudhakar Hegde Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of the ktcp act. the same is said to have been kept on public display, inviting suggestions and objections, if any. 105 according to the petitioners, the bda is said to have appointed consultants for providing inputs in relation to the formation of the prr. they were, m/s indian resource information and management technologies ltd. (irimt ..... which alone the proceedings initiated thereunder shall lapse due to any default, the different circumstances and period of limitation envisaged under the central act, 1894, as amended by the amending act of 1984 for completing the proceedings on pain of letting them lapse forever, cannot be imported into consideration for purposes of b.d.a ..... high court in khoday distilleries ltd. case (supra) to exclude the applicability of sections 6 and 11-a as amended and inserted by the central amendment act of 1984 to proceedings under the b.d.a. act. the submissions to the contra on behalf of the appellant has no merit whatsoever and do not commend themselves for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2014 (HC)

High Court of Karnataka, Represented by the Registrar General and Othe ...

Court : Karnataka

..... thereof. (2) this section applies to- (a) any offence triable exclusively by the court of session or by the court of a special judge appointed under the criminal law amendment act, 1952 (46 of 1952 ); (b) any offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years or with a more severe sentence. (3) every magistrate who tenders ..... u/s 313. cr.p.c. this is the conduct of a.10, which is relevant in terms of section 8 of the indian evidence act. 319. pw1 lodged first information ex.p1, after the occurrence and cr.no.113/2000 came to be registered on the said basis. the place of occurrence is situated within jagajeevanram ..... number of persons who are charged and the provisions of law under which they are charged. the evidence of pw43 shows that, along with the request to accord sanction, fir, mahazars, fsl report and other connected records were sent to the sanctioning authority. his evidence further discloses that, after examination of the said records and application of mind .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //