Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: inevitable accident Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 1 of about 27 results (0.015 seconds)

Feb 28 2012 (TRI)

Mahender Singh and Others Vs. Mcd and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... have not been able to establish that they were appointed directly to the post of assistant malaria inspector as they did not have requisite qualification as contemplated under the recruitment rules and consequently, the inevitable inference that they were promoted from the post of seasonal malaria beldar to the post of assistant malaria inspector and on account of getting one promotion in 1977-78, they are only entitled for ..... . honble high court of delhi had clearly given a finding that since the applicants therein did not possess the educational qualification as per the rrs in vogue at that time the inevitable inference was that they were promoted from the post of seasonal malaria beldar to the post of assistant malaria inspector and since they had got one promotion in year 1977-78, they ..... . in any case since honble high court has already concluded that in the absence of having requisite qualification at the time of appointment, the inevitable inference that be drawn is that applicants were promoted from the post of seasonal malaria beldar to the post of assistant malaria inspector, the present case is fully covered by the above judgment of ..... able to establish that they were appointed to the post of assistant malaria inspectors as they did not have the requisite qualification as contemplated under the recruitment rules and consequently, the inevitable inference is that they were promoted from the post of seasonal malaria beldar to the post of assistant malaria inspector. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2013 (TRI)

Constable Brijbeer Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through Its Chief S ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... we agree with the respondents that having spent few hours with the accused at the time of accident and taking the injured constable to the hospital, the applicant should have been able to identify the accused. ..... the nature of these questions leaves us with no doubt that they cannot be termed as clarifications being sought by the eo leading to the inevitable conclusion that eo has himself cross examined the witnesses. ..... on 11.5.98 therein you, got written that when after committing the accident driver sikh of maruti van ran towards vijay chowk, ct. ..... the respondents, on the other hand, argued that the applicant was a material witness of the accident in which one constable of the force lost his life. ..... dl-6cd-3224 from which accident happened was produced by ct. ..... on 10.5.98 therein you got written that accident happened in front of your eye during your duty and driver of maruti van was driving the maruti van fast, carelessly and negligence due to which accident occurred. ..... he saw the accident and stopped the said maruti van and took the injured constable to r.m.l. ..... what did you do on 10.5.98 after accident? ..... being a member of the police force, it was his duty to assist in prosecution of the accused of the said accident. ..... the applicant (brijbeer singh) was a material witness of the accident. ..... charanjeet singh, who was allegedly driving the vehicle involved in the accident. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2007 (TRI)

Mahabir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... the facts as stated are that applicant, chief goods clerk, northern railway station, tuglakabad while performing his duties met with an accident on 16.1.1997 and sustained injury to both lower limbs resulting in traumatic amputation of left leg below knee and deglowing injury of right foot along with loss of all toes of right foot. ..... the facts noticed hereinabove would lead to inevitable conclusion that there had been delay in taking decision by respondents at two stages, viz. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2007 (TRI)

Ravinder Singh S/O Sh. Shripal Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... taking the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case into consideration, we come to the inevitable conclusion that the applicants have not been able to establish their claim for the relief sought. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

Y.S. Chaudhary and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

shailendra pandey, member (a): by this common order, we propose to dispose of the oa 280/2008 and oa 2661/2010, as they involve identical issues of facts and law. the issue involved in the above oas is whether the delay in convening meeting of the dpcs by the respondents (railway board) in the case of the applicants was due to reasons beyond control or because of administrative delay/inefficiency and what would be the consequence if the delay on the part of the respondents is not found to be explained/justified. for the sake of convenience, it would be necessary to briefly record the facts of the case in writ petition (c) no.2020/2011 [arising out of oa no.280/2008 filed by shri y.s.chaudhary and others]. in this oa the applicant and four others were group `b officers and had been substantively appointed in group `a/junior scale of the irse with effect from 14.1.2005 vide ministry of railways notification dated 23.03.2005 and their revised inter se seniority in irse on their promotion to group a from group b was circulated vide ministry of railways notification dated 18.5.2006. they were aggrieved by the delayed induction from group b to group a. being dissatisfied, they approached the tribunal in oa no. 280/2008 for setting aside the notification dated 18.5.2006 issued by the respondent inducting the applicants in group a junior scale of irse with effect from 14.1.2005, instead of from 2002-03 when the vacancies arose and further to direct the respondents to give them the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1998 (TRI)

All India Income Tax Scheduled Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... , though general candidate is more meritorious in order of merit prepared by the public service commission or the selection committee, when the appointments are made and the vacancies are filled up according to the roster, necessarily and inevitably the reserved candidates though less meritorious in the order of merit maintained by the public service commission would occupy the respective places assigned in the roster. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2007 (TRI)

M.K. Bansal S/O Shri T.R. Bansal Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... the inevitable conclusion that emerges from all the evidence on record is that the charged officer has secured undue advantage in the matter of his candidature in the said examination by adopting clearly unfair means so as to get his name .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2006 (TRI)

Shri Arvind Kumar Section Officer Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (Through th ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... substantial reduction in the number of pay scales must inevitably lead to clubbing of posts and grades which were earlier different and unequal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2006 (TRI)

Smt. Renu Venkaik W/O Shri R.K. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... substantial reduction in the number of pay scales must inevitably lead to clubbing of posts and grades which were earlier different and unequal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2007 (TRI)

J.T. Sulaxan Rao and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)(1)SLJ1CAT

..... that is, however, the indirect, though necessary and inevitable, result of the mandate. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //