Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: inevitable accident Court: andhra pradesh Page 11 of about 820 results (0.109 seconds)

Feb 08 1963 (HC)

State Bank of Hyderabad Vs. Joint Family of Mukundas Raja Bhagwandas a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1964AP236

..... but that is not to say that such a transfer is inevitable even though the board cannot take cognizance of the case for purposes of settlement of debts within the meaning of the act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 1955 (HC)

In Re: Yendrapragada Ramulu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1957CriLJ949

subba rao, c.j.1. this criminal revision petition was referred to a bench by satyanarayana raju, j., on the ground that the question raised is of some importance.2. the facts are simple. on 30th march, 1954, the municipal sanitary inspector, guntur, purchased 16 coffee tablets from the accused and sent a sample to the chemical analyst, madras, for analysis. the chemical analyst, in his report, stated that the sample contained not more than 45 per cent, of coffee and at least 55 per cent, of foreign adulterant. thereafter, the municipal health officer, guntur, filed a charge-sheet against the accused under rule 37-a read with rule 38 of the rules framed under section 20 of the madras prevention of adulteration act (hereinafter referred to as the act) alleging that, on 30th march, 1954, the accused sold a mixture of coffee powder adulterated with 50 per cent, of foreign adulterant as mohini tablets.the accused not only denied the commission of the offence but also pleaded that he did not commit the offence as he satisfied the conditions laid down in section 6(2) of the act. the stationary sub-magistrate held, on the evidence, that the accused sold mohini tablets as coffee-powder with 60 per cent, of foreign adulterant. he did not accept the plea of the accused that he complied with the provisions of section 6(2) of the act and, therefore, he was not liable for the offence. in the result, he convicted him under rule 37-a of the rules framed under section 20 of the act and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 1993 (HC)

T.L. Prakash Rama Rao Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1993(3)ALT149

..... stretching the definition of land to any extent, what is inevitable is the acquisition of land that should be a dominant purpose and consequentially the things attached to the said land, be it buildings, trees, crops or wells, can also be part of acquisition. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2001 (HC)

Bathula Venkatamma Vs. Voggu Mahendra Gupta and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALT693

..... 1756 of 1999 i had already expressed my opinion that normally in matters of this nature, the matter should be decided only on merits unless it is inevitable and the conduct of the party is so blameworthy. in e.i. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1995 (HC)

Andhra Bank and anr. Vs. Station House Officer, Pattabhipuram Crime Po ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(2)ALT587; 1995(2)ALT(Cri)587; 1996CriLJ277

..... it must inevitably follow, on this view, that since the offence charged against the respondent was one alleged to have been committed by him before he became a party to the proceeding in matter no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 1960 (HC)

J and J Dechane Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1960)ILLJ765AP

..... in evaluating such elusive factors and forming their own conception of what is reasonable, in all the circumstances of a given case, it is inevitable that the social philosophy and the scale of values of the judges participating in the decision should play an important part, and the limit to their interference with legislative judgment in such cases can only be dictated by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 2008 (HC)

Land Acquisition Officer (Sdc) Vs. Y. Vijaya Kumar and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2010(1)ALT371

..... despite the exercise to the maximum restraint, the inevitable conclusion is that the conduct of the presiding officer, who passed the order under revision, is despicable and outrageous. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 1986 (HC)

Shairkhan Mohammed Abdullah Vs. the District Collector, Kurnool and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1987AP199

..... . 5814/c1/77-3, dated 29th september 1977, that 'the lands belonging to poor persons with meagre land holdings (not more than 2 to 2 1/2 acres) should not be acquired unless otherwise inevitable for the purpose of maintaining proximity and vicinity to the main village and contiguity of the lands' would invalidate the acquisition proceedings ..... . 5814/c1/77-3, dated 29th september, 1977, that 'the lands belonging to poor persons with meagre land holdings (not more than 2 to 2 1/2 acres) should not be acquired unless otherwise inevitable for the purposes of maintaining proximity and vicinity to the main village and contiguity of the lands' ..... . 7342/c1/76-4, dated 27th december, 1976, the state government directed the collectors 'to ensure that the lands belonging to harijans are not acquired for the purpose of providing house-sites, except where it becomes otherwise inevitable' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 1977 (HC)

Bharat Hybrid Seeds and Agro Enterprises and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1978CriLJ61

ordersambasiva rao, j.1. this petition for quashing the entire proceedings in c. c. no. 17 of 1977 on the file of the special judicial second class magistrate, kurnool, is filed under section 482 cr.pc the petitioner, a firm end its managing partner, were charged with the offence under section 7 read with section 19(a), seeds act. the offence is alleged to have been committed on 7th sept. 1973. the complaint was lodged on 8th nov. 1976. the punishment that can be imposed for the alleged offence, even if it is proved and a conviction is based thereon, is only a fine; and, therefore, as prescribed by section 468 (2) (a), the period of limitation for taking cognizance of such an offence is only six months. in this case, there is no doubt that the case has been filed long after the expiry of the period of six months which is the period of limitation. however, the court took cognisance of the case. the present petitioners, when they appeared as accused, filed crl. m. p. no. 66 of 1977 for throwing out the complaint as time-barred and to acquit them. the lower court refused to comply with this application and so the accused have filed the present application for quashing the entire proceedings.2. sri s. venkata reddy appearing for the petitioners, contends that, admittedly, the cognizance of the offence for which a period of six months is fixed as limitation, was taken long after the expiry of that period. the complainant did not give satisfactory explanation for the long delay .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2000 (HC)

Srinivasa Constructions Ltd., Hyd. Vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD236; 2000(4)ALT146

..... any defect in the execution of the work on the part of a contractor executing the basin levelling and filling work would inevitably and adversely affect the work executed by the petitioner and would render him liable qua the guarantee and warranty that the petitioner is obligated to provide. ..... it is not possible to orchestrate a common and inter-dependent schedule, if the two packages are awarded to two different agencies since any failure of a contractor awarded the basin levelling and filling work would inevitably upset the schedule as also adversely impact the economics of the petitioner's work. ..... a resolution of this contention inevitably, invites a reappraisal by this court, of the satisfaction arrived at by the bhel that the two works arc different and distinct and could be separately executed. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //