Court : Allahabad
Reported in : 2007(4)AWC4204
..... itbp-25) was sent for verification of character and antecedents of the petitioner by the respondents after selection/appointment of the petitioner as a constable in indo tibetan border police force. in the said report of the district magistrate, ghazipur it has been clearly stated that 'gorakhnath putra sri raj narain kc viruddha nyayalaya me ..... record reveals that the petitioner was selected for the post of constable in indo tibetan border police force in 1995 after going through several physical tests and other formalities. after selection the petitioner was directed by the head constable to fill up ..... record.2. the petitioner has filed this petition against his termination from service vide impugned order dated 28.10.1996 passed by the commandant, first battalion indo tibetan border police force (respondent no. 2) and for a direction to the respondents to allow him to participate in commando training.3. a perusal of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
..... central government under section 47 of the pwd act, exempting all categories of posts of 'combatant personnel' only of the central para military forces (cpmfs) namely central reserve police force (crpf), border security force (bsf), indo tibetan border police (itbt), central industrial security force (cisf) and assam rifles, from the provision of said section, the said provisions cannot be invoked or utilized by the petitioner for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1930All136
Mukerji, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant in this Court. His suit was, in its form, one for redemption of a mortgage which his father, defendant 13 and one Raghunandan, who died as a member of the joint family with the two other persons mentioned, purported to mortgage certain occupancy lands on Asarh Sudi 6, 1293-F., corresponding to sometime in July 1886 for a sum of Rs. 299-15.-0. The plaintiff offered to redeem on payment of the aforesaid sum. The defence was that the plaintiff never made an offer to redeem, that there were two bonds by which certain moneys were tacked on the mortgage of 1886 and that to redeem the property the plaintiff was bound to pay not only the sum of Rs. 299-15-0 but also two additional sums amounting to Rs. 1,156-4-0. One of these bonds is dated 27th July 1893 and is for Rs. 170-0-0, carrying interest at 15 per cent per annum and the other was a bond dated 22nd July 1898 for Rs. 85-0-0 carrying interest at the same rate.2. The rejoinder of the plaintiff ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1954All393
..... royalty. this, according to the petitioner, was an act unauthorised by law, there being no provision under the terms of the licence for such attachment. on 6-3-1951 the police seized the stock of gypsum which the petitioner had in his possession and the petitioner's allegation is that this was done by the ..... police under the orders of the district magistrate who ordered the prosecution of the petitioner under section 379, i. p c. for the offence of theft of gypsum from village sehra. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1959All440
..... the transaction; and the fact that the mask is legally perfect in itself will not save it from being torn off and discarded. the border line between motive and intention may be thin and hard to distinguish -- every border, is troublesome for those who have to guard it -- but the question whether a particular transaction is genuine or 'sham' is one of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1960All660; 1960CriLJ1390
Mootham, C.J.1. This is a difficult case. The Bar Council Tribunal has found the charge of professional misconduct which it framed against the Advocate of inordinate delay in the presentation of a petition, not to be proved, but the correctness of that finding has been challenged before us. In considering this matter I think that in the first place it is convenient to state shortly the facts which are not in dispute.2. The complainant had been a lower division clerk in the Central Excise Department, but his services were terminated by a notice which expired on 30-6-1956. He was then residing in Rampur, and on the 4th July he came to Allahabad to instruct an Advocate of this Court to file a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for the purpose of having notice terminating his services quashed. The Advocate's services were engaged and he prepared the requisite petition and affidavit. The affidavit was sworn by the complainant at 6.30 p.m. on Friday, the 13th July, and the compla...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1962All315
Desai, C.J.1. I would answer the question in the negative; I regret I cannot agree with the view expressed by my learned brothers to the effect that Nyaya Panchayats are as courts subordinate to this Court within the meaning of Section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act. They may be 'courts' but I am not persuaded to hold them to be subordinate to this Court. in the case of Sukhdeo Baiswar v. Brij Bhusan, : AIR1951All667 referred to by them. I did hold that they are subordinate to this Court but I revised the view in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Ratan Shukla : AIR1956All258 and Bishun Kant v. Vijai Bahadur Singh, Cr. Misc. Contempt Case No. 6 of 1959, D/- 25-11-1959 (All).2. Neither (the Contempt of Courts Act nor the Constitution, ,nor any other enactment explains which Courts are subordinate to this Court. The Government of India Act and the Constitution have used different phrases to describe how other Courts stand in relation to the High Court of the territory they being 'inferior co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : (1880)ILR2All1
..... war, the maharajah received a sanad, dated 22nd september 1847, recognizing him as entitled to continue in possession of his ancient hereditary estates with all government rights thereto belonging of police jurisdiction and collection of revenue free from any demand of tribute or revenue on the part of the british government; and it was declared that his chaharumains, feudatories, adherents and ..... ,103 souls. no tribute is paid to the british government. the nawab maintains a force of 315 artillery with 28 guns, 505 cavalry, and 977 infantry. he has also a police force of 1,023 men, and regularly constituted courts for the administration of justice.30. the facts to which we have adverted show that the ancestors of the nawab of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : (1887)ILR9All253
Mahmood, J.1. The dispute which has given rise to this litigation has two main branches: one relating to the validity of an alleged adoption of the plaintiff Lekhraj by Chandan Singh, zamindar of the Gabhana estate, and the other relating to an alleged adoption of the defendant Ganga Sahai by Musammat Khushal Kuar, one of the widows of Hira Singh, who was the zamindar of Birpura, another estate of considerable extent. Both these branches of the litigation raise important questions of fact and difficult questions of law which require disposal. But, independently of these questions, some further complication has been introduced by the course which the proceedings in this case took in the Court below. It will be convenient to dispose of the last mentioned matters before going into the merits of the litigation itself, for these matters are of a preliminary nature, and formed the subject of the first part of the argument addressed to us by the learned Pandit who has appeared on behalf of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1990All143; (1990)1UPLBEC542
ORDERV. N. Khare, J.1. Since common questions of fact and law in this writ petition and in the connected writ petitions are involved, we propose to decide these writ petitions by a common judgment.2. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 4215 of 1990 is an Advocate and was appointed as a District Government Counsel (Civil), Basti on 7-4-1983 for a period of one year. His appointment as District Government Counsel (Civil) Basti is alleged to have been extended from time to time, the last extension being for a period from 1-7-1989 to 30-6-1992.3. Petitioner No. 1 in Writ Petition No. 4392 of 1990 is an Association duly registered with the Registrar of Societies, Chits and Firms, U.P. Lucknow-W, known as U.P. Government Counsel (Criminal) Welfare Association, Meerut Branch, District Courts, Meerut (hereinafter referred to as an 'Association'). The Association is said to be a State Level Organisation of Public Prosecutors and Additional Public Prosecutors ap-pointed under Section 24 of the C...
Tag this Judgment!