Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT272
..... the investigating officer because t.i. shri samadhiya was senior officer to him and he was in charge of the work of investigation in the present crime. police officer shri gaur would have taken care of collecting some material with him for the purpose of justifying the apprehension of ashish batham because ashish batham was ..... . he could find ashish batham and, therefore, he apprehended him and brought him to shajapur. when a person is brought for the purpose of investigation, a police officer cannot immediately arrest him without getting himself satisfied about his participation in the crime as an accused. shri gaur was justified in not arresting him there at ..... collector, who collected the tickets from ashish batham when they alighted at dahod (gujarat). shri gupta, then blamed the prosecution for not examining shri gaud, the police officer, who apprehended ashish batham at bhopal and had seized a diary from him.18. shri gupta submitted that the spot from which the blue jeans pant and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 1997(2)MPLJ376
ORDERA.K. Mathur, C.J.1. Petitioner has by this writ petition challenged Notification No. 7-B-1-38-91-CTD-V dated 27th March, 1995 issued by the respondent No. 1 State (Annexure-B) as being ultra vires Articles 14, 301, 302 and 304(a) of the Constitution of India.2. Brief facts giving rise to this writ petition are that the petitioner is a Company having its distillery and bottling unit at village Rojrachakra, District Raisen. The petitioner is manufacturing beer at its Indian Made Foreign Liquor Unit and has entered into an agreement with Jagajit Industries taking franchise of their products for being manufactured at the bottling unit of the petitioner. It is alleged that some more groups are having manufacturing facilities in the State of M.P., namely, U. B. Group, Shaw Wallace, B. D. A Limited; Jagajit Industries and Tilak Nagar Industries. It is alleged that the State of M.P. in exercise of its powers conferred under clauses (g) and (h) of Sub-section (2) of Section 62 of the Madhy...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : AIR2004MP82
Dipak Misra, J.1. In this batch of appeals preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, the appellants have called in question the defensibility and the legal propriety of the composite order passed by the learned single Judge in a bunch of writ petitions as well as the sustainability of a Singular order passed separately. It is apropos to state here the learned single Judge disposed of eight writ petitions by a common order on the base that common questions of law with slight variation of facts arose for determination and hence, they deserved to be dealt with by a common order. As in another writ petition, the factual matrix was depicted in a different manner he passed a separate order. We may state at the outset that all the writ petitioners have not preferred appeals but only present appellants have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court taking recourse to intra-Court appeal.2. In different appeals facts have been adumbrated in different manners but essentially the facts which h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 1996CriLJ3191; II(1996)DMC640
..... committed suicide by hanging herself. the accused/appellant had called his landlord ramprasad prajapati (pw 1) immediately after the incident, who lodged the report (ex.p-7) of the incident. police came to the spot and got opened the door of the room in which the deceased had committed suicide. the dead body was sent for post-mortem examination. dr. d ..... that the deceased hemlata had closed herself in a room and that her feets are visible from outside. thereafter, they went to the house of the accused/appellant, where the police had already arrived and it was discovered that the deceased hemlata was dead and hanging by the rope from the roof. though in the earlier part of his statement babulal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2001ACJ648; 2000(3)MPLJ561
..... crossing from bus stand on 18.2.86, truck no. cpd 8250 driven by dev kumar rashly and negligently hit him resulting in his death. the matter was reported at police station, hanumanganj and case under section 304a of the indian penal code filed in the court after investigation. autopsy of the dead body of mahmood-ul-hassan was conducted on .....
Tag this Judgment!