Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2002(1)ALD423; 2002(2)ALT77
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. These writ petitions involving common questions of fact and law were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The controversy centres round the validity of the notification issued in G.O.Ms.No. 3, SocialWelfare (TW.EDN. II) Department dated 10-1-2000.Facts in Brief :2. The fact as stated in Writ Petition No. 19392 of 2000 are being considered for the purpose of deciding the questions involved.3. The writ petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 19-9-2000 passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 2138 of 2000 whereby and whereunder the learned Tribunal allowed the OA., field by the respondents 1 to 5 herein and quashed G.O.Ms.No. 3, dated 10-1-2000, wherein it was directed that the posts of teachers in the Schools in the Scheduled Areas in State shall be filled in by the local Scheduled Tribe candidates only out of whom 33 1/3% shall be women.4. The writ petitioners challenged the impugned order of the learned Tribu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : II(2004)ACC591; 2004ACJ529; 2004(1)ALD449; 2004(1)ALT100
..... by order or on behalf of the government or to any goods which a soldier, sailor, airman or any other officer of the armed forces of the union or a police officer or a member of the territorial army or of the national cadet corps may take with him on a railway in the course of his employment or duty as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2005(6)ALD582; 2005(6)ALT364
..... or religion but on the ground the persons belonging to harizan and muslim communities were found not to have been guilty of the conducting necessitating additional police force. repelling the contention, the supreme court did not accept and came to the conclusion that in the absence of any material that other class ..... said provision, the government of rajashtan declared twenty-four villages as disturbed areas for a period of six months and permitted the inspector general of police to deploy additional police force at the cost of the inhabitants while exempting harizan and muslim inhabitants from bearing the costs. this notification of the government was successfully ..... 102 5 0.000134 0.0000715(other than dros)addl. dist. magistrates 47 2 0.000062 0.000028mandal executive 1126 89 0.0015 0.0013magistratesub-divl. police 146 9 0.00019 0.00013officers168. table 11.2 shows number of persons and state/muslim average in government employment. while interpreting the statistical figures, one should .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2004(2)ALD1; 2004(1)ALT659
..... of the panchayat secretary are very wide, categorized into different heads such as those relating to panchayat administration, general administrative functions, help to concerned departments, police functions, community welfare and development, maintenance of various records and co-ordinating functions.section 33 provides emergency powers to the sarpanch, in consultation with the ..... such concerns. on account of its size, resources and national perspective, the federal government is able to deal with certain problems that extend across the borders of individual states. the state governments can focus on the unique impact that a problem may have in a particular geographical or economic area, are ..... jagannathan : [1986]2scr17 ) and also on julius v. lord bishop (1880) 5 ac 214 (hl) which case was followed by this court in commr. of police v. gordhandas bhanji : [1952]1scr135 . we are unable to agree with the above contention. as pointed out earlier, the constitution bench of this court in c.a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2001(6)ALD582; 2001(6)ALT433
..... father and son, the claimants in the earlier proceedings before the motor accidents claims tribunal suffered injuries while operating their tractor, and to that effect they gave statement before the police. immediately, the insurance company made enquiries and moved the tribunal under sections 151, 152 and 153 cpc praying to recall the awards passed by the tribunal. the petition was dismissed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2006(2)ALD585; 2006(2)ALT289; [2006(110)FLR282]; (2006)IIILLJ570AP
..... court is not concerned with the substance or the merit of a decision is the leading expression. lord brightman spelt out the principle in chief constable of the north wales police v. evans (1982)1 wlr 1155. judicial review is concerned, not with the decision, but with the decision making process--judicial review, as the words imply, is not an appeal ..... was ultra vires were to have any less consequence in law than to render the instrument incapable of ever having had any legal effect.... again in boddington v. british transport police(1999) 2 ac 143 lord chancellor irvine reiterated this principle by stating that when an act or regulation has been pronounced by the court to be unlawful, it is then .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2000(1)ALD76; 1999(6)ALT608; II(2000)DMC470
ORDERN.Y . Hanumanthappa, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order and decree passed by the learned Judge of Family Court, Visakhapatnam in OP No.84 of 1995 (Old OP No.288 of 1994), dated 22-5-1997, filed by the husband under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act against the wife Radhika for a decree of divorce and for custody of the child Kum. Vijeta.2. The rank of the parties is mentioned as before the Court below.3. A few facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are as follows: The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was performed on 25-8-1988 at Visakhapatnam. After the marriage, the respondent joined the petitioner at Visakhapatnam. The marriage proposal was made by one Pentakota Apparao, a friend of respondent's parents. At the time of marriage proposal, the petitioner and his parents were not willing for alliance as the respondent was a student in Medical College at Guntur and she may not be a good housewife. But the petitioner and his pare...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2006(6)ALT523; 2007(1)CTC97; AIR2007AP57; 2007(2)AIRKarR382(FB)
..... are not in pari materia legislations. the former is a fiscal enactment referable to the taxing powers of the state whereas the latter is a regulatory enactment in exercise of police powers of the state. even while interpreting the provisions of the registration act, this distinction cannot be ignored. registration act is a pre constitution enactment made by british parliament and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2002(4)ALD389; 2002(4)ALT9
..... no and there cannot be any unreviewable decision, be it the exercise of sovereign power, be it the exercise of prerogative power, be it the exercise of legislative powers or police powers or powers of taxation. all decisions are susceptible for judicial review subject to limitations. in the indian context, having regard to the unique role assigned to the judiciary, and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... ". that is the mandate of article 300a of the constitution. if the power of eminent domain is to be exercised or the enjoyment of land is regulated by use of police powers coupled with eminent domain, the state cannot ignore the constitutional mandate because every prerogative power of the sovereign is subject to the constitutional provisions intended to ensure rule of ..... opinion was so strong that the government of andhra pradesh issued g.o.ms.no.240, dated 28.09.2006 conveying their consent under section 6 of the delhi special police establishment act, 1946 (delhi act) to entrust the matter to central bureau of investigation (cbi). the head office of cbi issued directions to its hyderabad office. in obedience thereto, five .....
Tag this Judgment!